JAK

Joined: 29th January 2010

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

JAK
Hi, and welcome to the forum. I'm not an expert on cameras from the 1950's other than perhaps personal use of a Box Brownie, however a Google search brought up this site that actually covers that serial number pertaining to..., as you believe, an Asahi Pentax S. There's quite a bit of history about them including an estimate of production numbers.
Hope that helps.

Comment by JAK posted on Asahi Pentax Black Body 'S'? at 28/08/2017 - 23:03

JAK
Someone on here may be able to help.

Comment by JAK posted on Milky way tonight? at 28/08/2017 - 12:43

JAK
walkeja wrote:
AlJones2402 wrote:
JAK wrote:
I do like it and agree the fence helps with foreground interest. Maybe if the gate was open it would invite you onto the moor?
That's just what I was thinking!
Still a very nice image.
You should NEVER break the Countryside Code to take photographs!
Pardon?

Comment by JAK posted on Mono Landscape nr Wheal Betsy last weekend at 26/08/2017 - 11:01

JAK
I do like it and agree the fence helps with foreground interest. Maybe if the gate was open it would invite you onto the moor?

Comment by JAK posted on Mono Landscape nr Wheal Betsy last weekend at 25/08/2017 - 14:48

JAK
There's a K-01 for sale on the forum here:
https://www.pentaxuser.com/forum/topic/f-s--pentax-cameras-and-lenses--mz-s--fa-...
That camera is also listed on Ebay at a higher price where it is cunningly disguised as an M42 standard lens. Just goes to show how scarce they are that sellers have to disguise them!

Comment by JAK posted on Looking to buy Pentax k01 in Uk at 25/08/2017 - 00:20

JAK
K-01's are scarce because they were only available for around 12 months from Feb 2012 to Feb 2013.
Quote:
Is it because the camera not good or popular???
As you are asking about is it any good or popular I'm wondering what you know about it. It isn't a DSLR so those who like a proper viewfinder aren't catered for. Some didn't like the 'brick' design of it and control layout making it uncomfortable to use. But it shares the sensor and general workings of the K-5 so it produces fine images.
It was a controversial camera which some liked and some hated. I guess it didn't sell well, stocks were sold off at half price and then it was discontinued which has made it something of a collector's item.
I'd read some reviews to see if it is a camera you'd love or camera you'd hate. I can't answer that for you!

Comment by JAK posted on Looking to buy Pentax k01 in Uk at 24/08/2017 - 23:29

JAK
Take a photograph and look them up when back indoors!. Anyhow, I mentioned a couple of books, albeit long out of print!

Comment by JAK posted on A selection of Butterflies at 24/08/2017 - 15:46

JAK
Why not just look them up on the web on a site such as https://www.britishbutterflies.co.uk/identification.asp ?

As to books, I've got the Observer's Book of Butterflies, and there's the I-Spy book too.
Comment Image

Comment by JAK posted on A selection of Butterflies at 24/08/2017 - 14:33

JAK
Jonathan-Mac wrote:
The Sigma 17-50mm is reputed to be very good. If you're not getting sharp results (you said they're no better, but not why, so I'm guessing) then it may be that you need to fine-tune the focusing. The other possibility is that you have a faulty copy of the Sigma.
Is fine tuning an option with non Pentax lenses? I understand that all Sigma lenses are recorded as 'Sigma Lens' so altering it for one lens would affect any other Sigma lenses. The global re-tune would put all the other lenses out.
And yes, it could be a poor copy of the lens so if you like it in principle, but not the results you're seeing, see if you can try another one. I've got a Sigma 24-60 f2.8, an earlier incarnation of that lens and it is really very good but again designed for full frame. It is pretty well inevitable that full frame f2.8 lenses are going to be heavier than similar lenses designed for APS-C wih a more modest aperture. I'm with you that sometimes the lighter combination means you take the camera with you rather than not bother due to its weight, hence I take out an MX-1 or K-S1 with 16-85. It really isn't always worth lugging heavy gear round on a visit to the supermarket!

Comment by JAK posted on Not sure if I'm happy at 24/08/2017 - 11:45

JAK
johnriley wrote:
The news has only just hit, but £2149 isn't expensive compared to the standard edition. I don't see the K-1 as expensive either, it's still at its intro price and compares well with the prices of other marques.
I paid the intro price on day 1 which was £1599. Present SRS price is £1999 so it has gone up £400. Best ever price was £1499.

Comment by JAK posted on whos going for it at 24/08/2017 - 10:02

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo