All Forum Comments
Comment by JAK posted on Asahi Pentax Black Body 'S'? at 28/08/2017 - 23:03
Comment by JAK posted on Milky way tonight? at 28/08/2017 - 12:43
I do like it and agree the fence helps with foreground interest. Maybe if the gate was open it would invite you onto the moor?
Still a very nice image.
Comment by JAK posted on Mono Landscape nr Wheal Betsy last weekend at 26/08/2017 - 11:01
Comment by JAK posted on Mono Landscape nr Wheal Betsy last weekend at 25/08/2017 - 14:48
https://www.pentaxuser.com/forum/topic/f-s--pentax-cameras-and-lenses--mz-s--fa-...
That camera is also listed on Ebay at a higher price where it is cunningly disguised as an M42 standard lens. Just goes to show how scarce they are that sellers have to disguise them!
Comment by JAK posted on Looking to buy Pentax k01 in Uk at 25/08/2017 - 00:20
Is it because the camera not good or popular???
It was a controversial camera which some liked and some hated. I guess it didn't sell well, stocks were sold off at half price and then it was discontinued which has made it something of a collector's item.
I'd read some reviews to see if it is a camera you'd love or camera you'd hate. I can't answer that for you!
Comment by JAK posted on Looking to buy Pentax k01 in Uk at 24/08/2017 - 23:29
Comment by JAK posted on A selection of Butterflies at 24/08/2017 - 15:46
As to books, I've got the Observer's Book of Butterflies, and there's the I-Spy book too.
Comment by JAK posted on A selection of Butterflies at 24/08/2017 - 14:33
The Sigma 17-50mm is reputed to be very good. If you're not getting sharp results (you said they're no better, but not why, so I'm guessing) then it may be that you need to fine-tune the focusing. The other possibility is that you have a faulty copy of the Sigma.
And yes, it could be a poor copy of the lens so if you like it in principle, but not the results you're seeing, see if you can try another one. I've got a Sigma 24-60 f2.8, an earlier incarnation of that lens and it is really very good but again designed for full frame. It is pretty well inevitable that full frame f2.8 lenses are going to be heavier than similar lenses designed for APS-C wih a more modest aperture. I'm with you that sometimes the lighter combination means you take the camera with you rather than not bother due to its weight, hence I take out an MX-1 or K-S1 with 16-85. It really isn't always worth lugging heavy gear round on a visit to the supermarket!
Comment by JAK posted on Not sure if I'm happy at 24/08/2017 - 11:45
The news has only just hit, but £2149 isn't expensive compared to the standard edition. I don't see the K-1 as expensive either, it's still at its intro price and compares well with the prices of other marques.
Comment by JAK posted on whos going for it at 24/08/2017 - 10:02


Hope that helps.