All Forum Comments
Tap those fingers pussy cat
Comment by ISO posted on FS: FA 28 mm f2.8 at 14/10/2010 - 14:53
I have searched the Forum for this topic. Suprised couldn't find it. On my SFXn I used my 50mm 1.4 but obviously digital pushes that. I have seen comments about this ranging from 28mm to 77mm - What are peoples views please.
Comment by ISO posted on Best Focal Length for Portraits? at 14/10/2010 - 11:05
see here
Comment by ISO posted on Somerset KX new user. at 13/10/2010 - 21:40
flossie wrote:
Hello and welcome. I'm sure you'll find this a friendly and helpful place - and please remember, there are no stupid questions as a beginner!
Surely there are no stupid questions FULL STOPHello and welcome. I'm sure you'll find this a friendly and helpful place - and please remember, there are no stupid questions as a beginner!
Comment by ISO posted on Somerset KX new user. at 13/10/2010 - 21:04
No clear winner yet then
Comment by ISO posted on DAL 35mm available at 13/10/2010 - 10:52
Yet another good reason for a pdf guide to the site
Comment by ISO posted on For Sale: Tamron SP 300mm f 5.6 Adaptall 2 lens with K mount at 13/10/2010 - 10:48
My Epson Printer has software included to do that as an option for any given number of pics in a given file - check your printer it may have the same??
Comment by ISO posted on Software to produce a 'Contact Sheet' style picture? at 13/10/2010 - 10:44
Mowog – I empathise – it’s funny that in different threads on different topics there have been many many comments by Members, to the effect that Lenses, not bodies, are the important thing: And given the undoubted quality of most Pentax Lenses, this is truer than for most Brands. I for one would not go for FF, just the sheer size of the beasts, but your point about lense value is spot on.
Comment by ISO posted on No more Pentax for me!... at 12/10/2010 - 15:44
MrCynical wrote:
Allow me to explain - I don't have any issue with the technical quality of the sample shots. In fact they are all great. My problem is that I'm perfectly happy with the subject isolation/bokeh of the third photo (the portrait of the younger bloke)... and that was taken at f4. So in other words it isn't a shot that I (had I the same amount of talent as the person who took the sample shots, which is unlikely ) could not have taken with the Macro.
!
So thinking Portraits hands up everybody which is best. Asssume price is not the issue. (Trouble is I quite like the Quick Shift & MFD of the 2.8 MacAllow me to explain - I don't have any issue with the technical quality of the sample shots. In fact they are all great. My problem is that I'm perfectly happy with the subject isolation/bokeh of the third photo (the portrait of the younger bloke)... and that was taken at f4. So in other words it isn't a shot that I (had I the same amount of talent as the person who took the sample shots, which is unlikely ) could not have taken with the Macro.
!
Comment by ISO posted on DAL 35mm available at 12/10/2010 - 15:13
