All Forum Comments
Comment by Horst posted on Abot reviews at 29/06/2015 - 14:12
For an old 'cheapie' the results look OK to me - I have owned virtually every Pentax fit 50mm lens made at one point or another - and have to say that I have never found a truly dreadful one. You can pick them all up so cheaply - they are great fun to play with and compare to modern lenses
Actually I thought those lemons looked a slight bit to orange.
Regards, Horst
Comment by Horst posted on Abot reviews at 29/06/2015 - 11:18
To tell what they think of the quality.
Regards, Horst
Comment by Horst posted on Abot reviews at 28/06/2015 - 23:58
Regards, Horst
Comment by Horst posted on Kookaburra at 28/06/2015 - 11:14
If we started to use a Takumar instead, then the difference would be obvious immediately in many ways, including colour vibrance, sharpness and build quality.
How stupid of the reviewer to compare a seven element and a 3 element lens and then saying the Takumar is better.
How stupid to complain about having only an f-stop of 2.8 .
2.8 is even excessive for Cooke triplet. 3.5 or 4 would be better.
I recon, it would be more sensible for the reviewer of any lens, just to show a series of images , close medium distance and infinity distance with the various f-stops.
One could see, If one likes what the lens ( actually the objective) produces .
All the charts on lines p/mm and similar technicalities are really irrelevant if you like or don't like the images the objective produces.
Regards, Horst
Comment by Horst posted on Abot reviews at 28/06/2015 - 11:11
I thought before I use it, I have a look at some reviews.
After I read a few, I was just about ready to commit suicide or send the lens to my worst enemy.
Some of the idiotic comments in various reviews:
It is not as good as my Takumar 50mm f1.4 What do they expect from a 3 element Cooke style triplet
it is slower than normal 50mm lenses. What do they expect from a 3 element Cooke style triplet
It is soft wide open. What do they expect from a 3 element Cooke style triplet.
The edge sharpness is not perfect. Who gives a s...
So Before I Jumped down some bridge, I went in to my backyard and took a few pictures with my K5 and this lens fitted.
I can't really find anything wrong with this lens. Maybe it is not quite as sharp as the latest 25 element
aspherical rare earth glass f0.5 25kg 50mm lens ,
I would say, this lens does take some very nice images.
This people who write some of the reviews must be photographing brick walls only.
The above applies to other lenses too. The 2 most idiotic comment reappear all the time
1. It is softer wide open . What else do they expect?
2. The lens is prone to flare especially wide open when taking pictures in to the sun.
This improves when fitting a lens hood. How stupid can you get, to mention the obvious ? Why would you even think of not using a lens hood?
Regards, Horst




Comment by Horst posted on Abot reviews at 28/06/2015 - 03:41
I don't care about my address , they are company addresses anyway.
Regards, Horst
Comment by Horst posted on User feedback on K-S2 at 18/06/2015 - 15:20


The lenses I talked about where just an example .
I bought the following : the FA77, the Fa43 and the FA 31 . All from the same shop.
I sold the 31 again, because I didn't like it very much.
I attached the receipts for the 43 and 77 so you can see they came from Kennedy's
I had them send to my work addresses.
At the moment I can buy a Canon EOS1000 with Kit lens for $699.- and a Canon EOS700D with 2 lenses for $999.- ,a NikonD5200 wit kit lens for $ 599.- and I originally bought my Pentax X-5 for $199.- including memory card and Bag from the local Post Office for $199.-
So far you haven't given me not 1 example of any Photographic lens or camera which is cheaper anywhere else than Australia
Regards, Horst

Comment by Horst posted on User feedback on K-S2 at 18/06/2015 - 14:10
Where else are you able to buy a new 2 year guarantee FA77 limited for $AU799.- and a DA43mm for $AU749.- ?
Not in the US , Japan and definitely not in England.
Anything with a lower cost , was second hand.
At least that what I have seen.
Regards, Horst
Comment by Horst posted on User feedback on K-S2 at 18/06/2015 - 10:14
I'm looking more to the USA for products now,
But have a look at this link: link
The seller is DCxpert and he is located in Melbourne.
All his items are new.
I bought a FA77 f1.8 limited for $Au799.- His has Sigma and Pentax items. When you buy from him, you pay him and then CR Kennedy sends the items directly to you, with full guarantee.
CR Kennedy are the sole Australian Agents for Pentax (Rico now) and Sigma.
The Australian Camera gear prices are the cheapest in the world.
Regards, Horst
Comment by Horst posted on User feedback on K-S2 at 17/06/2015 - 14:52


The distinctive circular shape in the Trioplan bokeh derives from the number of aperture blades. The Trioplan f2.8/100 is made of fifteen steel aperture blades whereas modern lenses often have only six plastic blades. This results in a circular aperture rather than the more common hexagon. The more blades, the more circular the aperture is.
Any lens, fully open, has a completely round aperture. therefore, any lens wide open should also have this effect. What crap. I have some old Kodak , Ilex, Agfa and lenses with 13 an 15 blades. None of them give this effect. I also don't think this totally exaggerated effect looks very good.
Regards, Horst