All Forum Comments
Comment by hkwiles posted on Just noticed at 10/09/2009 - 17:06
[quote:3496ace15f="Mike-P"]yet. I'll wait some more years until it does.
Long wait I think.
Comment by hkwiles posted on Who has, will have a K-7? at 10/09/2009 - 15:15
Howard
Comment by hkwiles posted on Just noticed at 10/09/2009 - 15:12
A member of this forum has threatened to take me to court for 'slander' now i would like to know what the forums views on that are as obviously if i am going to court for something posted on the forum, there would have to be representatives there along with of course, someone to explain why slander was actively allowed on the website
could anyone enlighten me?
Cheers
Fi x
If you will feel more confident with that camera I am sure you will want to persevere more with its mannerisms and foibles, in the end it is all down to a good composition and eye for a shot.
Good Luck in your endeavours
Howard
For me the 'Prestige' thing is totally irrelevant. I prefer to have the labels on the inside of my clothes and not splashed across the front. Badge engineering is a marketing device. :
" Beckham gets paid £7M for advertising thier stuff, how much are they paying you ?"
Comment by hkwiles posted on Just noticed at 09/09/2009 - 12:28
but it IS a more prestigiuos car .
I think I would see Pentax as the Skoda to Canon as the Audi.
Same if not better , but certainly better value.
Howard
I agree about the cameras and of course Skoda was taken from being an also ran in the car market to a contender. It'd be nice if Pentax could do the same thing but I doubt it.
Of course, my Samsung has much less 'prestige' than a Pentax but at £299 I can handle the shame
I tend to spend a long time perusing the market for whatever item it is, be it big boys toys, trainers , you name it and whenever possible look to a lesser know brand if it provides better value.
I keep looking at the Big 2 but am drawn back to the K7 and the encouraging reviews of late just enforce my decision to opt for the Pentax.
Of course the "bewildered herd" will opt for whichever camera Comet, Dixons ,Currys push in front of their noses.
Its forums like these that can help a newcomer to get a more reliable view before making a choice.
Howard
Comment by hkwiles posted on Just noticed at 09/09/2009 - 10:49
So do Ford ! but I aint swopping my BMW for one !.
Howard
I don't think Canon need your guess - they manage to grab 40% of the total market by themselves
So do Ford ! but I aint swopping my BMW for one !.
Howard
Also, Pentax's problem is that Canon and Nikon are seen as more prestigious in the market place. Through brilliant marketing, BMW, in reality yet another European mass car producer, is seen as more prestigious than many other makers.
How about giving up your Pentax for a Ford, then?
I think I would see Pentax as the Skoda to Canon as the Audi.
Same if not better , but certainly better value.
Howard
Comment by hkwiles posted on Just noticed at 09/09/2009 - 08:07
Pentax and Nikon cameras are designed by human being for human beings.
Canons, of course, are designed by robots. I wouldn't presume to hazard a guess at their target market.
Howard
Comment by hkwiles posted on Just noticed at 08/09/2009 - 19:40
Im talking about little things like position of ISO button , front and rear thumbwheel , AF switch.
Howard
Comment by hkwiles posted on Just noticed at 08/09/2009 - 11:40
comments ?
Comment by hkwiles posted on Just noticed at 08/09/2009 - 10:26


Howard