All Forum Comments
Comment by grahamwalton posted on Thank you both, to Tracey and Rick. at 28/05/2026 - 11:35
Comment by grahamwalton posted on Which Monitor at 22/07/2025 - 19:16
You've lightened the day.
Best wishes with your treatment.
Graham
Comment by grahamwalton posted on ELTON JOHN is alive and well in BRENTWOOD England ! at 04/04/2020 - 18:48
Lets hope that this situation clears sufficiently for them to re-open in the autumn.
Graham
Comment by grahamwalton posted on Camera Clubs and Coronavirus at 18/03/2020 - 14:08
What resolution have you scanned this at and what file format have you saved in?
This will be a very large file size. Can your computer, version of elements or printer, cope with this size of file.
You will need a printer with an extended print length capability, to cover 1 meter in length. My A2 Epson would not do that.
Comment by grahamwalton posted on Printing at 05/04/2013 - 23:34
Comment by grahamwalton posted on If you could have been the photographer... at 25/03/2013 - 19:32
Comment by grahamwalton posted on Ink Jet flow systems at 18/03/2013 - 20:35
I have always found that the Perntax 18-55 is a good performer and certainly ok for up to A3 prints.
A good alround replacement for the kit lens is the Sigma 17-70. This lens performs well and will close focus.
For real close up work you need a proper macro lens. To work at a reasonable distance from the subject a lens in the 90 to 105 mm focal length is a good choice. An old Tamron Adaptall 90 mm manual Macro Lens is a good starter choice. There are 2nd hand 2X Macro Converters available, which coupled with a 50mm manual lens, make an effective 100mm macro set up.
Comment by grahamwalton posted on Lens Suggestions at 16/03/2013 - 10:49
I visit many Camera Clubs and Exhibitions. The winners of the competitions and exhibitions are nearly always Old Fred's who are also good with Photoshop. Years ago the Old Freds fiddled and diddled in the darkroom to produce winning pictures. Now the same Old Fred's have a digital SLR and Photoshop. Old Fred and Billy Whizz are the same person. Rarely ever does a young Billy Whizz get the winner. Don't write off old Fred, he's smarter than you think.
Some people say that Photoshop users are lazy. In my opinion the people whose only part in making the print, is to press the shutter button, are the lazy ones. Press the shutter button and hand it over to Snappy Prints, to do the rest.
Comment by grahamwalton posted on Is photoshop ruining photography at 13/03/2013 - 20:12
50 x 40 cm is in fact 19.7 inches x 15.75 inches, so is almost the same as the old 20 x 16 inch standard.
I visit lots of Photographic Societies. Very rarely do I come across any Photographic Society where the mount sizes are any different to 50 x 40 cm or 20 x 16 inches.
In my opinion, the standard mount size does give all prints an equal footing and concentrates the judge or viewer on the print image. It also helps with displaying prints on easels and print stands. Small mounts can also cause damage to prints on large mounts; when they rattle around the storage box.If there was no control over mount size, some photographers could submit prints that were much larger than their competitors.
Comment by grahamwalton posted on Photograph Mount Size..? at 24/01/2013 - 11:19


Not many camera club photographers seemed to join, which was a pity.