Photograph Mount Size..?
If we're talking aesthetics, then it's a matter of how it looks. We made a choice regarding exposure, composition, etc., so hopefully we're up to deciding what mount size will suit a particular image best.

I agree with you, large mount is not always best.
Best regards, John
David
PPG: http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/davidtrout
PPG: http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/davidtrout

Best regards, John
50 x 40 cm is in fact 19.7 inches x 15.75 inches, so is almost the same as the old 20 x 16 inch standard.
I visit lots of Photographic Societies. Very rarely do I come across any Photographic Society where the mount sizes are any different to 50 x 40 cm or 20 x 16 inches.
In my opinion, the standard mount size does give all prints an equal footing and concentrates the judge or viewer on the print image. It also helps with displaying prints on easels and print stands. Small mounts can also cause damage to prints on large mounts; when they rattle around the storage box.If there was no control over mount size, some photographers could submit prints that were much larger than their competitors.
Friendly Regards
Graham
There's no doubt what is needed for competitions - it's in the rules. What is best for a given print for display is something else, which i think may have been what the OP was getting at?
Best regards, John
Ken
“We must avoid however, snapping away, shooting quickly and without thought, overloading ourselves with unnecessary images that clutter our memory and diminish the clarity of the whole.” - Henri Cartier-Bresson -
There's no doubt what is needed for competitions - it's in the rules. What is best for a given print for display is something else, which i think may have been what the OP was getting at?
Yes John it was. Also, although I don't think it's in the rules but no doubt someone will correct me, some judges think all competition prints should be in a white (or nearly white) mount. For me, as with the mount size, I think the mount colour should compliment the picture.
I'm beginning to see now why I never win any print competitions....
Mind you, you can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear no matter what the mount..!!
6th Year Apprentice Pensioner




Cheers
Dave
Pictures always look better with a slightly deeper mount at the bottom.
+1
dangie
Member
Staffordshire, England
I like to match the mount size to the size of the picture. For example for a 10x8 picture I use a 12x10 mount, giving a 1" border all round. A 12x8 picture I use a 16x12 mount giving a 2" border.
However many people like to use a large mount no matter what the picture size is. It is quite common to see a small picture in a large mount. At our local photography club we had a talk given by a competition judge. He said that judges like to see pictures inside 20x16 mounts as they 'look better'.
Personally I don't think they do. A small picture in a large mount to me looks lost.
Also I think it's a waste of good mountboard.....
What are your views?
6th Year Apprentice Pensioner