Glowingblue

Joined: 1st May 2013

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

Glowingblue
Take no notice, these are an improvement, the last one in particular, my fave of this set would benefit from a vignette, this would direct eyes towards your daughters face and her beautiful eyes

Comment by Glowingblue posted on Portrait lighting 2nd attempt at 17/11/2013 - 10:39

Glowingblue
In that case I apologise
Blythman wrote:
Glowingblue wrote:
Why post over processed and HDR type images, I thought the idea was to let other viewers see the IQ of K3, or have I got this wrong?
If so, I apologise
Sorry Karl. I don't recall stating what my purpose was, so maybe you have

Comment by Glowingblue posted on More K-3 Photos at 16/11/2013 - 18:23

Glowingblue
You are asking me and you don't seem to know yourself lol
davidstorm wrote:
Glowingblue wrote:
I never said they where, I said 'HDR type'
What does 'HDR Type' mean Karl? It's either HDR or it's not HDR isn't it?

The ones above are single exposure images, not multiple exposures blended to HDR.

Regards
David

Comment by Glowingblue posted on More K-3 Photos at 16/11/2013 - 18:12

Glowingblue
I never said they where, I said 'HDR type'
davidstorm wrote:
Glowingblue wrote:
Why post over processed and HDR type images, I thought the idea was to let other viewers see the IQ of K3, or have I got this wrong?
If so, I apologise
These are not HDR images Karl, Alan did mention this above.

Regards
David

Comment by Glowingblue posted on More K-3 Photos at 16/11/2013 - 18:05

Glowingblue
Why post over processed and HDR type images, I thought the idea was to let other viewers see the IQ of K3, or have I got this wrong?
If so, I apologise

Comment by Glowingblue posted on More K-3 Photos at 16/11/2013 - 17:52

Glowingblue
Number two works well, you might try and light up the head and hat on this shot next time, give a bit more depth to image.

Comment by Glowingblue posted on first lighting attempt at 15/11/2013 - 09:59

Glowingblue
Hear Hear!
Gwyn wrote:
Are you looking at the same photo as me????

The space suggest the isolation of the woman working in a man's world. Her face shows so much emotion, exhaustion, pride. I love the fact that it reminds one of a Victorian portrait, whilst showing a very 21st century woman.

1stEverPentax wrote:
It's ok but nothing special. reminds me of the pictures that get taken in those passport booths...


You must have a better class of passport photo than most people.

Comment by Glowingblue posted on Help! Is this portrait that good? at 14/11/2013 - 21:49

Glowingblue
I like it, I don't like the dead space above her head. I like the 'EASY' on the collar, ironic really, seeing as how being a jockey is probably not!

Comment by Glowingblue posted on Help! Is this portrait that good? at 14/11/2013 - 16:58

Glowingblue
Two very nice Nikons, enjoy

Comment by Glowingblue posted on Farewell folks at 09/11/2013 - 18:25

Glowingblue
Not sure what the problem is, if there is a problem?
I have exactly the same issues with my 16-45.
I find, on occasion, I have to focus on an area with more contrast then it locks on focus. BTW, mine is the Samsung branded 16-45. I'm in love with the results this lense gives and so forget the occasional focus moods
Marky wrote:
I've had my da16-45 for a while now and for the last 2 years I've had some issues where you half press the shutter button and nothing happens apart from a strange noise for a fraction of a second. Sometimes if you point the lens at an object further away the lens will autofocus.

I thought this was my k20 at first but its doing this on my k5ii as well, although the lens was fine on my k100.

The focus ring moves nice and smoothly.

So is this a problem with the lens, do people think it is fixable and how much am I looking at?

Comment by Glowingblue posted on da16-45 autofocus focus issues at 08/11/2013 - 02:48

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo