All Forum Comments
Comment by George Lazarette posted on *istD and PC Synch socket at 28/06/2004 - 23:25
I personally never use the bundled software for downloading images. All you need is a little batch file like this:
move G:dcim100pentx*.* D:Newpics
This will move any file in G:dcim100pentx (which is the path to my images on the card) to my picture folder, D:Newpics.
All you have to do is change the paths to what works on your computer/camera combination and save the file as a text file called anyname.bat (it's the ".bat" that matters).
Then click on the icon for the file and watch your pics download. Much quicker than waiting for the Pentax download software to fire up.
Just one point. My Fuji camera has to reformat the card if I delete all the pictures on it in the computer (which is what happens when you use "Move"). So for the Fuji I use "Copy" instead of "Move", and delete in-camera. I don't know how the Pentax P&S digitals work, but "Move" is fine with the *ist D.
George
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Downloading pics from camera to computer at 21/06/2004 - 13:24
The 28-70 looks like my best bet.
Rather ominously, I can't find any reviews of your 28-90. I presume it doesn't come up to the standard of the other lens?
George
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Pentax-F 1:3.5-4.5 35070mm. Comments please. at 22/06/2004 - 00:07
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Pentax-F 1:3.5-4.5 35070mm. Comments please. at 21/06/2004 - 11:51
Oddly enough the lens was part of a job lot including an SFX, F 75-210, and the 400 flash. None of it appeared to have ever been used. Neither lens has a mark on it of any sort, and the other lens is a cracker. Perhaps the 35-70 has a manufacturing fault of some sort.
George
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Pentax-F 1:3.5-4.5 35070mm. Comments please. at 20/06/2004 - 22:04
I haven't bought anything very exotic, and have not paid very much. The average price has been under £40.00, for lenses in excellent condition.
Some have been replacements for lenses I used to own, like the lovely 75-150mm zoom (I left my first one in a taxi!), and almost all have been excellent.
The one exception has been the 35-70, which produces muddy, low contrast pictures. I believe this to be the same lens optically as the A version, which gets quite good marks on Stan's site.
If anybody else has this lens I would welcome their comments. It's a useful little zoom, and I'd like to know if mine is a dud, or if they are all like this.
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Pentax-F 1:3.5-4.5 35070mm. Comments please. at 20/06/2004 - 10:25
If you buy a card reader, you can download the images without upgrading your operating system.
I personally never use the bundled software for downloading images. All you need is a little batch file like this:
move G:dcim100pentx*.* D:Newpics
This will move any file in G:dcim100pentx (which is the path to my images on the card) to my picture folder, D:Newpics.
All you have to do is change the paths to what works on your computer/camera combination and save the file as a text file called anyname.bat (it's the ".bat" that matters).
Then click on the icon for the file and watch your pics download. Much quicker than waiting for the Pentax download software to fire up.
Just one point. My Fuji camera has to reformat the card if I delete all the pictures on it in the computer (which is what happens when you use "Move"). So for the Fuji I use "Copy" instead of "Move", and delete in-camera. I don't know how the Pentax P&S digitals work, but "Move" is fine with the *ist D.
Comment by George Lazarette posted on WIn98 drivers for a pentax optio 33LF at 20/06/2004 - 10:45
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Optio S4i: Pictures in nightshot-mode are blurry!!! at 13/06/2004 - 19:38
However, in the case of both a visitor and a regular contending to buy, there would be nothing to stop a seller from selling to the regular if he so wished.
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Should adverts be banned? at 13/06/2004 - 21:19
There have in fact been very few advertisements appearing here; although the one from Gordon did attract a number of responses.
The addition of a section within the forum specifically for ads would surely solve whatever problem there is, and in fact it would be an improvement on the existing classified ads section of the site because it would:
a) be more visible, with no need to visit the ad section to see if there was a new ad
b) allow sellers to post answers to questions
c) result (possibly) in more ads, which would generate more traffic to the forum.
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Should adverts be banned? at 12/06/2004 - 12:24

