George Lazarette

Joined: 14th January 2004

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

George Lazarette
Quote:

blende8
Lens-Buying-Enabler, retired
Admission executive of the "Kate IS/WAS/AND CONTINUES TO BE WONDERFUL" Nutters Club

Kate Adie/Middleton/Moss/Rusby/Kiss me/the Great/Winslet/Nelligan/Hoey/Beckinsale?

My guess is Hoey.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on Question for Matt on M/K lens metering at 03/04/2007 - 16:29

George Lazarette
Yes, given that it works OK with all lenses when set to A, that suggests it is not a focussing screen problem but a software problem.

But it's very strange, because the light that the camera is measuring is the same light that will be used to take the picture. There is no need to adjust for the working aperture, as there is when metering wide-open.

It's as though the camera is making an adjustment when none is needed.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on Question for Matt on M/K lens metering at 03/04/2007 - 14:27

George Lazarette
Thanks, Matt,

If it's down to the screen, surely that would affect all lenses, not just pre-A lenses.

My guess is that this is an algorithm issue, and if the algorithm processing is done in firmware, then it should be fixable.

Come on, Pentax.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on Question for Matt on M/K lens metering at 03/04/2007 - 13:45

George Lazarette
Having been playing around with a number of my older lenses recently, prior to selling some of them, I have to agree with Chris A and all the others - something isn't working with the metering when the lens is not set to A on the aperture ring.

Apologies to Chris, incidentally, for suggesting he was doing something wrong.

My question is, is this something that is likely to be controlled by firmware, and therefore fixable, or is it controlled by a lower level of software which can't be updated?

I don't imagine it is a mechanical problem.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on Question for Matt on M/K lens metering at 02/04/2007 - 16:18

George Lazarette
Welcome to the club, Lilly.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on Ohmigawd! at 01/04/2007 - 18:16

George Lazarette
Quote:
You're just to smart George
Good try, though, Rodger.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on The dangers of digital photography at 01/04/2007 - 10:21

George Lazarette
Apparently these worrying phenomena vary with the time of year. April 1st is a particularly bad time, it seems.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on The dangers of digital photography at 01/04/2007 - 10:12

George Lazarette
Quote:
Nicolay wrote:
I have done a couple of tests comparing in-camera sharpening versus sharpening in PS (I have Pentax DL).

The result is that I have difficulty detecting much difference, in fact the photos taken with in-camera sharpening set to +2 look as good as the ones I sharpen during post-processing. Sharpening in PS does not result in less noise as far as I can ascertain.

As this seems to contradict the theory, can anybody explain what is happening? Has anybody done more systematic tests ?
I would never sharpen in Camera. If you do so you are stuck with the settings and it cannot be undone in PP. I would also suggest that your in camera colour space be Adobe and sRGB. It has a wider colour Gamut.
You may regret your doing in camera sharpening when one day you decide to print a large poster size image for example.
Adobe and SRGB?

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on Question re. in-camera versus Photoshop sharpening at 06/04/2007 - 18:04

George Lazarette
Bear in mind, Thomas, that if you buy a good lens second-hand on Ebay, you are likely to be able to sell it again later for much the same money.

So the fact that it costs a bit more isn't really a major consideration. Most people can beg or borrow the £350 -£400 that a second-hand 77mm will cost, and you'll also have the satisfaction of owning one of the world's best lenses.

That's what I would do (if I didn't already have a second-hand 77mm bought on Ebay!).

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on affordable fast 85mm? at 01/04/2007 - 18:48

George Lazarette
Quote:
85mm f1.4 - as rare as rocking horse poo and expensive new and second hand..

I managed to get a hook on one several years ago, gorgeous, gorgeous lens..

If you can't find one at the moment, what about a 1.4 teleconverter or the Pentax 1.7 adapter? Might not be ideal and as the lens you already have is an M-series, you won't lose out on facilities.......
That's not a bad idea. Get a 1:1.2 50mm, marry it up to the 1.7 convertor, and for under £250 you'll have a dream 50mm plus a 1:2 85mm with AF.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on affordable fast 85mm? at 01/04/2007 - 10:19

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo