All Forum Comments
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Used/refurb *istD vs K100D/K10D? at 13/06/2007 - 16:27
In your shoes, I would consider the Pentax-FAJ 18-35. It's not a bad lens for the money.
G
carl
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Which lenses for K100D? at 13/06/2007 - 20:13
If you don't need AF, and can live without zooms, stick with what you have. The only problem is that you lack a wide-angle (the 28 is equivalent to 42 on digital).
G
cheers Lee
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Which lenses for K100D? at 13/06/2007 - 14:47
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Which lenses for K100D? at 13/06/2007 - 12:05
I ate the sushi
"I ave a uge eadache!!!"
Actually, in correct English, we do pronounce aitches like the French, though gradually the aitch sound is creeping in where once it was silent. I still say 'otel, but I confess to pronouncing the aitch in History, unlike Churchill.
But you should get with modern usage, and say Haitch. (I 'eard it on the BBC, guv, hhhonest.)
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Update on New 16-50mm Pentax Lens at 13/06/2007 - 07:50
hope they keep to their word
If you want a more reliable answer, cast a few runes, or disembowel a chicken.
If you go the runic route, I commend using the Anglo-Saxon Futhorc. It's especially good at divining lens availability, which is, of course, essential for successful gear freaks.
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Update on New 16-50mm Pentax Lens at 12/06/2007 - 19:10
Hi I have jsut received an email from Penatx UK and have been told the new lenses will be out This summer for sure (2007) that is
We will just have to wait with as much patience as we can muster.
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Update on New 16-50mm Pentax Lens at 12/06/2007 - 18:50
i bought this item but form there ebay shop so you don't get the option to pay the possible import tax and guess what...there was none! as it was valued at £141 s and the limit is £180 so i saved myself some cash there but if you plan on buying anything over say £220 i would advice the tax option
By not declaring the proper value of the goods, you have evaded VAT, which is a criminal offence.
If I were you I would adopt a slightly lower profile.
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Pentax AF-540 FGZ @ Digital Rev £248 inc DHL & Import Tax at 02/08/2007 - 17:24
it was not about "imitating"nikon lenses...it just happens that I have one left, and would have loved to use it...
and my guess is tha Pentax M 35 1.4 are not that common...
But your Nikon should be worth a bit. Enough, perhaps, to get a second-hand Pentax 31mm Ltd. Then you'll have something quite superb (and I am not knocking the Nikkor, which is a great lens).
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Nikon lens on K10D at 11/06/2007 - 08:31
First, even if you can find an adapter, it will not be possible to place the the lens close enough to the sensor to obtain focus on distant objects (with a wide-angle that's anything over about twenty feet).
Second, you will lose all automation, including stopping the lens down when you press the shutter.
Old Pentax K mount 28mm lenses can be found very cheaply on Ebay. Metering can be a problem with the K10D, but nothing that can't be overcome.
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Nikon lens on K10D at 11/06/2007 - 08:06


To whit:
Two wheel operation.
PC Sync.
Wireless flash.
More knobs (as opposed to menus).
Remote operation from PC.
And a number of others which I forget
The K100D has two advantages over the *ist D:
SR
Recording speed
If you tend not to shoot in lowish light (and hence have little need for SR), and have a rather deliberate style of shooting but nonetheless value a full set of features, then the *ist D would be a good choice.
I have never seen a shred of evidence that picture quality is better on later models.
And finally, as the owner of both a *ist D and a K10D, I have to say that whilst the K10D is a more "powerful" camera, the *istD is in many ways nicer to drive. This is especially the case if you value the traditional Pentax virtue of petiteness.
G