All Forum Comments
Comment by George Lazarette posted on SMC A 50mm f1.2 at 17/07/2007 - 17:20
One reason to hang onto the K, instead of buying an A, is that it will last longer. The A on the aperture ring introduces additional complexity in the form of springs and ball bearings, and these items can, and do, fail. The A 50mm 1:1.7 is especially prone to such problems.
Also, if it does go, in the manner you describe, are they repairable?
I've had my A 50mm 1:1.7 since my very first camera (a Super A), so I'm quite attached to it.
So, if you keep the aperture ring on A at all times, you should never have a problem. I hope.
My original 1.7, bought new with a Super A in 1984, is still fine, but another one I bought over Ebay developed the problem I have described.
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on SMC A 50mm f1.2 at 17/07/2007 - 09:52
I reckon longevity will go like this:
From best to worst:
K
M
FA Limited
A*
F*
FA*
DA Limited
A
F
Expensive FA (eg: 100mm 1:2.8 macro)
D FA
DA
FAJ
Cheap FA (consumer zooms)
G (not part of the list, but probably in the right place)
Comment by George Lazarette posted on SMC A 50mm f1.2 at 16/07/2007 - 23:15
George,
..........I have only two pre-A series primes, the K 50mm 1:1.2 & M 400mm 1:5.6
(Well, only two that I plan to keep.)
and I don't really want to change them.
I just hope that Pentax gets enough flack about this issue that they do something about it and fix it soon.
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on SMC A 50mm f1.2 at 16/07/2007 - 23:03
I think the thing about the A50f1.2 isn't the extra half stop but the incredible softness wide open and shallow DoF. It is quite dreamy and creamy overall.
Plus its compatibility with the K10D over the K version.
It's heavy as hell because it is almost all glass, and the build quality of course is almost on a par with a Limited lens. It's a delight just to hold and behold.
Mine is the K version, but it's fine on the K10D because I almost always use it wide-open. Why have it otherwise?
It does indeed have a dreamy, creamy, quality that no other lens can match.
In short, it's one of those lenses that you really can't manage to be without, even if you don't use it very often. I'd have to be very broke to sell mine.
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on SMC A 50mm f1.2 at 16/07/2007 - 22:28
Be aware that you are likely to get a bill for tax from HM Customs, along with the lens!
Thanks
Kevin
Lens: $560
Shipping 40
Subtotal 600
Duty 29
Subtotal 629
VAT 110
Subtotal 739
Agent 30
Total 769
Sterling 380
SRS 349
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on SMC A 50mm f1.2 at 16/07/2007 - 20:59
I wish we could get some more - we had the last 6 left in Europe, but we sold out about 4 months ago. I think most of them went to people on here!
I get them very occasionally second hand - I sold one about a week ago which was in Mint condition and it went for £349.
I keep a list of wants - if you are looking for anything second hand give me a shout and I'll add you to the book.
Chris
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on SMC A 50mm f1.2 at 13/07/2007 - 19:33
I've read a few times recently that this lens is still available new in Japan. Does anyone know where, or is this an internet myth?
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on SMC A 50mm f1.2 at 13/07/2007 - 13:21
Huh?
I have a friend who has a whole pile of Canon gear...
Matt
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on weird but true... at 13/07/2007 - 13:26
Ok
I have just done a few PEF test shots and they will only open in the pentax software I have. Which I have to be honest I dont like.
They wont open in CS3 or Silkypix 3 so what software will they work with
Pete
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on The RAW vs JPEG Debate at 12/07/2007 - 18:25


I notice that although the iris of the 28mm appears nicely slick and neat, that of the 50 gives uncertain aperture shape when the lever is moved by finger,...now a perfect hexagon,...now a slightly distorted one, indicating play in the iris mechanism. obviously this has no effect on exposure since the actual area stays constant enough, however in view of your points about the f1.7 do you think this is ok?....not sign of something about to give up? Do i need to get invasive about this or ignore?
If I were you, I would do nothing, other than to give the lens lots of use. You might then find it gets better with exercise. However, if the blades are sticky, this could cause the iris to close too slowly, resulting in over-exposed pictures.
Suck it and see. If it doesn't cure itself, get a quote for a service. Once serviced you will know it works, whilst buying another on Ebay might mean you end up with two problem lenses.
G