All Forum Comments
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Pictures of Tucuman, Argentina mountains… at 14/07/2007 - 22:55
Naciste en Argentina o solo trabajas ahí?
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Pictures of Tucuman, Argentina mountains… at 14/07/2007 - 22:22
George, read my post again....
Sorry, Takumar is the name given by Asahi to their screw-mount lenses. A few bayonet lenses were also produced under the Takumar name but they lack SMC coating, and are best avoided.
Your lens is actually described as "Takumar (bayonet)" on the lens barrel, and this description prevents confusion.
It won't meter properly on the K10D.
G
Was my main portrait lens, used less because it was too 'long' and something to do with my later acquisition - FA* 85mm 1.4
I believe it's a perfectly adequate lens most of the time, but obviously not so good with the light in front of you.
The exposure issue with the K10D gets progressively worse as you stop down. If you were mainly doing portraits at wide apertures, you may never have experienced a problem.
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Lens help needed..... at 15/07/2007 - 22:34
George, read my post again....
My Tak K is a bayonet lens....
P
Your lens is actually described as "Takumar (bayonet)" on the lens barrel, and this description prevents confusion.
It won't meter properly on the K10D.
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Lens help needed..... at 15/07/2007 - 12:55
George, read my post again....
My Tak K is a bayonet lens....
P
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Lens help needed..... at 15/07/2007 - 12:52
I have K10D and one of the first lenses I used was my old Takumar K 135 mm f2.5 lens...
Result = fantastic photo.
So, is it a K10D problem? My experience says no.
There is no reason why you cannot get excellent pictures with any lens provided you expose correctly.
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Lens help needed..... at 14/07/2007 - 19:16
....My advice would be to avoid SMC Pentax-M series and older lenses unless they fulfill a specific need that newer series lenses can't offer. These lenses have an undesireable exposure problem when used with a K10D. This issue is not yet fixed, but we here hope it will be, and soon.
Here is a link to one of many discussions on Pentax lens fit rae000.
https://www.pentaxuser.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=4359&highlight=pentax+lens+...
Hope that helps.
Regards
Drew
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Lens help needed..... at 14/07/2007 - 15:50
Could be. But the signal should be in binary. Whether the signal is weak or diffused, on is on, and off is off. Sending analog pulses would of course be too prone to errors caused by distance and all sorts of other factors.
As least logically it makes sense to me that way. So I'm not sure how the brolly would make a difference.
I do not actually know the exact encoding scheme -- but it would be cool to have a way to record whats happening and decipher what is being sent/received.
Of course, as in your case, bright light can mask/overpower the signal altogether and cause the signal to not be seen in one direction or the other, or both.
Brollies often have bits of silvery metal on them, and it is not impossible that reflections could add to the signal. You know: "Send reinforcements, we're going to advance" becomes "Send three and fourpence, we're going to a dance".
I'm sure your problem is of this nature.
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Thoroughly confused about PTTL & wireless at 14/07/2007 - 18:48
Well, you can either pay out for a P-TTL one (like the current Pentax ones, or the Samsung or Sigma equivalents), or get yourself a cheap manual one to get yourself started.
I use one of these and it does me fine, even when the in trickier situations - it only takes a couple of test shots to sort your exposure and then you're off!
Only takes 2 seconds to recharge to full power too, which is nice.
Dan
If buying manual, try to get one with several manual settings - eg: full power, 1/2, 1/4, 1/8.
Swivel and, especially, tilt, are useful, as they facilitiate bounce flash. A sensor is useful, too, as it enables the flash to cut off when it deems that the camera has had enough light for the set aperture.
If you see one on Ebay with a diffuser, and/or a slave trigger, the package will probably cost less than buying them separately.
I find a flash bracket to be very useful to move the flash a bit further away from the camera, and thereby reduce red-eye. I know you can get rid of red-eye, but it's best to avoid it altogether.
If you want to stick to Pentax, the AF240Z is usually pretty cheap, but it only has one manual setting. The AF200T has lots of manual settings, but the head is fixed.
I would suggest getting the Samsung equivalent of the AF360FGZ if the budget will stretch. It'll have all the manual control you could wish for, and you'll never have to upgrade, even when you buy a wireless flash body, like the K10D.
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Pentax Bounce Flash AF22OT TTL 645+AF at 14/07/2007 - 07:53
Will this flash work with my K110D ?
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Pentax Bounce Flash AF22OT TTL 645+AF at 13/07/2007 - 22:30


Google Dirks' surname. Interesting first hit! http://trotteyn.com/
G