George Lazarette

Joined: 14th January 2004

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

George Lazarette
Quote:
.......... I have a polarizer (52 mm, not fitting on the newer lenses).
Don't forget the crop factor. You can use a step-down filter from a 55mm- and perhaps even a 58mm-filter lens and not get vignetting.

My 49mm-filter ring flash works fine using a step-down ring on my 58mm-filter macro lens.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on Long exposure using crossed polarizers [img] at 06/08/2007 - 23:48

George Lazarette
Quote:
McBrian wrote:
we are fortunate to own our own building (an old cottage) which has a fully equiped studio (and dark room), club members can rent it for their own use at the princely sum of £7.00/session (no time limit)
You are so fortunate!!!!

No such luck in the small French town where I live. That's why I had almost stopped doing photography in the last 5 years.

Ah! I'm so happy with the K10D, I can photograph again!

Still wish there was a studio and darkroom though...
Nowadays we have a computer and a darkened room.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on A reply (sort of) to G's ICBM at 07/08/2007 - 10:16

George Lazarette
Quote:
McBrian wrote:
Since I got a bit of a doing from G (JR also to some extent on EP) on my portrait PP style, I would like to share this one with you all for critique, please bear in mind I still haven't finished G's mushroom yet
I don't seem to have been sent my code book yet. What is 'a bit of a doing'? Who (or what) is 'G', 'JR', 'EP' and 'PP'?
G See below.
JR John Riley
EP E-Photozine (I think)
PP is post-processing (in other words, mucking about with the image in PS (that's Photoshop) or some other similar IESW (image-editing software).

TTFN

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on A reply (sort of) to G's ICBM at 05/08/2007 - 22:43

George Lazarette
Quote:

It's ICBM that's got me stumped, unless George has access to some seriously wicked weaponry. I always that it meant Inter-Continental Ballistic Missile.
Your guess, I am sure, is correct. Brian is referring to my mild reproof for excessive PP-ing.

Technically, I think this is a far more restrained and (to me) acceptable piece of work than the earlier efforts.

Very good lighting, perfect exposure, delicate PP work. Very good.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on A reply (sort of) to G's ICBM at 05/08/2007 - 22:50

George Lazarette
Hazza,

You've got a good location, lovely light, effective use of depth of field. It's not bad at all, except that the buildings on the left look a bit odd, as though they were falling away down the hill.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on First K10D image? at 05/08/2007 - 22:55

George Lazarette
Quote:
421€ is 285£ in my currency converter. So it seems it's a bit cheaper in France.

Having lived in England for six years I doubt that you find many items to be cheaper there...
If any 16-45 owner buys the 16-50, he/she might well sell the 16-45.

So keep an eye on Ebay.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on 16-45mm & 16-50mm and their price at 05/08/2007 - 18:49

George Lazarette
Quote:
I know
I'm sort of trying the retro thing first ...
and the kit lens if I can stretch that far
finding the whole Pentax lens lineage thing most interesting !

Hows the weather on the IoM ?
can't be wetter than here
Pete
The predominant element in the Isle of Man is wind, lots of it. It's a wind-farmers delight. We do get rain, but so far we have escaped the deluges on the mainland.

Let me know if there are any retro lenses that you are interested in. I stll have a few that I need to sell.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on K100 soon ...should I go for an older 80-200mm 4.5 ? at 05/08/2007 - 08:53

George Lazarette
Quote:
Thanks for that Mate,
useful !
Yep i know the prime thing its just the way I wrote it ...
will attempt to be clearer

i meant a manual everything lens which is all i have used...
kind of strange to be changing aperture on the camera body
spose I can get used to it
cheers
Pete
You'll soon get used to it, and if you don't, you'll be cutting yourself off from more and more superb new lenses.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on K100 soon ...should I go for an older 80-200mm 4.5 ? at 04/08/2007 - 15:41

George Lazarette
Quote:
Hi Guys,
As I contemplate a K100D purchase on a budget
I have started to gather about me a nice old prime or two
I see the 80-200 4.5 has had a few good reviews...
But is it a good idea for the K100...
is the downside of no auto more trouble with zooms so I should get the DA 50-200 ?
use would include a motor cycle meet...auto focus might be the killer app there ?

cheers
for any thoughts
Pete
I think you need a terminology overhaul.

An 80-200 is a zoom lens - not a prime. Prime lenses have a fixed focal length; zooms can be set to any focal length within a range - in this case anywhere between 80mm and 200mm.

So do you mean a manual focus lens, or a manual aperture lens? The latter are less easy to use on modern Pentax cameras (which includes all the digitals), and the K10D's meter doesn't like them at all.

My view is that there are some old prime lenses from the manual era (focus and/or aperture) which are worth having. Very few old zooms are worth having, though the 75-150 and 70-210 are both good.

In particular, old macro lenses are a good buy. You really don't need automation with macro. And old long tele lenses are much cheaper than new ones, and often very good too.

By the way, I am only talking about SMC Pentax lenses here. There's a lot of inferior rubbish out there.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on K100 soon ...should I go for an older 80-200mm 4.5 ? at 04/08/2007 - 08:57

George Lazarette
Quote:
sold for 400GBP!
Could you please let me have his address. I've got some stuff I need to sell.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on SOLD: Pentax K10d + Sandisk 2gb = 5 months old ± 900 shots at 18/08/2007 - 07:42

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo