gartmore

Joined: 3rd March 2006

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

gartmore
Quote:
pschlute wrote:
Can anyone recommend a uk processing company for B+W film/prints.

Also what are your experiences having the film scanned onto cd for further digital manipulation yourself.
I have always thought that b&w printing should be done by the photographer.

However, HCB got somebody to do his for him, so who am I to argue?

G
I've always processed my films and printed myself until I befriended a brilliant B+ W printer (Paris Match, French Vogue, GQ etc.), he is better and faster than me and doesn't waste so much paper!

Comment by gartmore posted on B+W processing at 28/03/2008 - 22:31

gartmore
I cant see anything amiss either

ken

Comment by gartmore posted on Can any one explain..... at 03/06/2007 - 23:25

gartmore
Best bag I've ever owned, you wont be disappointed. The pull on waterproof cover is really useful if you have to work on a beach just to keep the sand out.

Comment by gartmore posted on Is Lowepro Slingshot really that good? at 05/06/2007 - 16:56

gartmore
what sort of batteries are you using?

Comment by gartmore posted on Pentax Optio E10 at 02/06/2007 - 09:49

gartmore
John, we tried them, by them I mean the curly sort I think Interfit and others do, on a shoot as practicals and found the output wasn't sufficient, less than old style photofloods. From this less than scientific appraisal I formed the opinion that in any sort of studio situation you might really be struggling and by that I mean shooting wide open at 1/30 or something. I have to confess that I do seem to be rather spoiled in the lighting area using several 10K lamps at once regularly. On the other hand we often work at very low light levels with the luxury of T* f1.2 Distagons wide open at 1/50th (not on a Pentax unfortunately). So, in conclusion, the lamps you mention will have their uses undoubtedly but I prefer my little budget flash heads for still studio work.

Ken

Comment by gartmore posted on Studio flash and high speed sync at 06/07/2007 - 21:18

gartmore
Quote:
gartmore wrote:


There is an even better range of lighting which I use quite a lot called Kino-Flo Diva Lites (www.kinoflo.com).
They look very much like powerful fluorescent lights to me. Are they not?

G
The tubes come in Tugsten and Dalylight balance and are flicker free, they are also dimmable. I find that using all daylight tubes is too cold and all tungsten too warm so I tend to use three daylight and one tungsten or vice versa. They also have barn doors. They come in a wide range of sizes from 6 inches (ideal for use in cars and indeed they can run off the car cigarette lighter) up to banks of 18 6ft tubes. There is also a white nylon diffuser which gives a really great quality of light.

However, getting back to McBrian's OP, no use at all for stopping motion!

Ken

Comment by gartmore posted on Studio flash and high speed sync at 06/07/2007 - 19:40

gartmore
doh!!! I'm obviously having a Homer moment, thanks Daniel

Comment by gartmore posted on Studio flash and high speed sync at 06/07/2007 - 13:06

gartmore
Quote:
There is an alternative to tungsten. Very powerful fluorescent bulbs are now available, colour-balanced to daylight. Unlike tungsten, they run cool(ish), and don't draw much power. They have an American ES fitting. I'm planning to try a couple.
There is an even better range of lighting which I use quite a lot called Kino-Flo Diva Lites (www.kinoflo.com). Whilst on the subject of lighting, I recently bought a really good book called 'The Complete Guide to Light and Lighting in Digital Photography' by Michael Freeman and published by Ilex and £19.99 from Waterstones. It covers every aspect and almost every piece of kit I've ever come across; I cant recommend it highly enough.

Ken

PS
When quoting on this forum is there a way to include 'Gartmore wrote:' or do you just type it in?

Comment by gartmore posted on Studio flash and high speed sync at 06/07/2007 - 12:53

gartmore
Brian, why do you want to sync higher than 180 in a studio? Depending on the flash head in use your effective exposure could well be 1/20000 of a second at f*. Outdoors, of course, is another matter and that's why Pentax have made leaf shutter lenses for the 645 and 67, probably aimed at wedding photographers primarily.

Ken

Comment by gartmore posted on Studio flash and high speed sync at 06/07/2007 - 09:03

gartmore
In this month's PhotoIcon there is a whole page devoted to the K10D and the 70mm pancake and very positive it is too. There is also an article on Eve Arnold with a snap of her taking those very famous pics of Marylin Monroe - and what does Ms Arnold have around her neck? Why a Pentax of course!

Ken

Comment by gartmore posted on K10D review at 22/05/2007 - 19:19

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo