All Forum Comments
Comment by Frogfish posted on SOS Band @ Big Bamboo, Shanghai at 26/04/2012 - 19:31
Excellent set Kevin. That 77mm has done a good job in your hands
Comment by Frogfish posted on SOS Band @ Big Bamboo, Shanghai at 26/04/2012 - 19:29
Definitely need to shoot in landscape to appreciate the 'lights'.
Comment by Frogfish posted on Even more Northern Lights at 25/04/2012 - 19:36
Talk about an Ugly 'Ol Coot !
Comment by Frogfish posted on Funny looking youngsters at 25/04/2012 - 19:33
#1

#2

#3

#4

#5

#6

#7

#8

#9

#10

Comment by Frogfish posted on SOS Band @ Big Bamboo, Shanghai at 25/04/2012 - 19:12
Comment by Frogfish posted on Lens for documenting / portraits at a wedding at 25/04/2012 - 12:27
Comment by Frogfish posted on Dissapointing retailer at 24/04/2012 - 15:25
Frogfish-
You are absolutely right, if course. But a fast zoom such as you suggest doesn't really meet the needs mentioned of being lightweight and small profile.
I just think a prime would feel a bit more inconspicuous and having seen the difference from my 18-135 and 50mm 1.7, I am a prime convert.
To be brutally honest : it's your wedding and if your brother is taking the shots you want something that works for him, and not your personal preference. Hopefully you'll only have the one wedding and I'm sure your brother would be thrilled to use a K5/17-50 kit.
You can see the 17-50 is hardly huge (sitting to the right of the 77 Ltd here), or heavy, on a recent paid gig I had it tucked away neatly in a pocket on my togs' vest.
My honest opinion is that you should give zooms another thought, which lens is actually the best and easiest for your brother to use. Maybe ask him too ! I prefer primes (as you can see from my sig.), but for paid gigs it's zooms every day of the week and primes for specialist work (low DoF etc.).
Anyway hope it turns out to be a fantastic day whichever way you go lens-wise 1

Comment by Frogfish posted on Lens for documenting / portraits at a wedding at 24/04/2012 - 12:04
A wedding is a very stressful, fast and unforgiving job. Usinf unfamiliar equipment is IMO a huge mistake. If you are going to do it, then use your own Pentax gear, but perhaps hire a backup body from SRS to be safe. Another K-7 would be ideal.
You can shoot most if not all of the wedding using the Tamron 17-50mm and maybe the 30mm f1.4 for any low light stuff in the evening. You have longer lenses if you want them for tighter portraits earlier in the day.
Study a wedding photography book for posing ideas, make sure you are well practised with your camera and have an assistant with you to help organise people.
Forget the Canon, it won't help at all. I would go further and refuse the job if I couldn't use my own gear.
Hope that helps!
17-50 on the K5, 70-200 on the K7 and your other two lenses in your pockets.
Comment by Frogfish posted on Wedding dilemma... at 24/04/2012 - 06:12
IMO the Tamron 17-50/2.8 is the perfect lens for your brother to use, he can learn the zoom function in less than one minute and it introduces a convenience factor that a prime just doesn't possess. This is why 99% of wedding togs use zooms for most of their work !
The lens is really sharp and a great lens as many here can testify, it can be bought from Amazon : Price: £288.64 & this item Delivered FREE in the UK with Super Saver Delivery.
The f2.8 over the 35/2.4 is nothing. The versatility is priceless.
Comment by Frogfish posted on Lens for documenting / portraits at a wedding at 24/04/2012 - 05:46


good set 1, 2 & 4 are excellent