Frogfish

Joined: 10th September 2010

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

Frogfish
cabstar wrote:
good set 1, 2 & 4 are excellent
Thank you Gary. That means a lot coming from you as shooting stage is your livelihood.

Comment by Frogfish posted on SOS Band @ Big Bamboo, Shanghai at 26/04/2012 - 19:31

Frogfish
Blythman wrote:
Excellent set Kevin. That 77mm has done a good job in your hands
Thanks Alan ! The 17-50 did a sterling job on the night too.

Comment by Frogfish posted on SOS Band @ Big Bamboo, Shanghai at 26/04/2012 - 19:29

Frogfish
I actually like the last shot best - even though there are less 'Northern Lights' in that one !

Definitely need to shoot in landscape to appreciate the 'lights'.

Comment by Frogfish posted on Even more Northern Lights at 25/04/2012 - 19:36

Frogfish
I just love those Grebe shots - those chicks are amazing.

Talk about an Ugly 'Ol Coot !

Comment by Frogfish posted on Funny looking youngsters at 25/04/2012 - 19:33

Frogfish
Busy busy month between running my company (just entering high season), birding, home being decorated from top to bottom and the odd paid shoot. This is from one of the later, hope you like them - they are an excellent band !

#1
Comment Image


#2
Comment Image


#3
Comment Image


#4
Comment Image


#5
Comment Image


#6
Comment Image


#7
Comment Image


#8
Comment Image


#9
Comment Image


#10
Comment Image

Comment by Frogfish posted on SOS Band @ Big Bamboo, Shanghai at 25/04/2012 - 19:12

Frogfish
As I've seen suggested elsewhere from time to time ... all of your guests are going to bring cameras (that's a cert) so ask all of them if they can send you 10 of the best shots from the wedding (hand out a leaflet with your email details on it) , for sure you'll get a bagful of shots that will capture the fun and flavour of the wedding.

Comment by Frogfish posted on Lens for documenting / portraits at a wedding at 25/04/2012 - 12:27

Frogfish
Excellent BM ! I've often wondered if directing the retailer to a thread like this would have a beneficial effect.

Comment by Frogfish posted on Dissapointing retailer at 24/04/2012 - 15:25

Frogfish
Evel79 wrote:
Frogfish-

You are absolutely right, if course. But a fast zoom such as you suggest doesn't really meet the needs mentioned of being lightweight and small profile.

I just think a prime would feel a bit more inconspicuous and having seen the difference from my 18-135 and 50mm 1.7, I am a prime convert.
When discussing conspicuousness you really have to take the whole package into consideration, my K5 with the 15 Ltd on it (gorgeous small lens - extreme left of this shot) or K5 with Tamron 17-50 will hardly make any difference whatsoever because it's the K5 that dominates not the lens (unless it's that Bigma) !

To be brutally honest : it's your wedding and if your brother is taking the shots you want something that works for him, and not your personal preference. Hopefully you'll only have the one wedding and I'm sure your brother would be thrilled to use a K5/17-50 kit.

You can see the 17-50 is hardly huge (sitting to the right of the 77 Ltd here), or heavy, on a recent paid gig I had it tucked away neatly in a pocket on my togs' vest.

My honest opinion is that you should give zooms another thought, which lens is actually the best and easiest for your brother to use. Maybe ask him too ! I prefer primes (as you can see from my sig.), but for paid gigs it's zooms every day of the week and primes for specialist work (low DoF etc.).

Anyway hope it turns out to be a fantastic day whichever way you go lens-wise 1

Comment Image

Comment by Frogfish posted on Lens for documenting / portraits at a wedding at 24/04/2012 - 12:04

Frogfish
johnriley wrote:
A wedding is a very stressful, fast and unforgiving job. Usinf unfamiliar equipment is IMO a huge mistake. If you are going to do it, then use your own Pentax gear, but perhaps hire a backup body from SRS to be safe. Another K-7 would be ideal.

You can shoot most if not all of the wedding using the Tamron 17-50mm and maybe the 30mm f1.4 for any low light stuff in the evening. You have longer lenses if you want them for tighter portraits earlier in the day.

Study a wedding photography book for posing ideas, make sure you are well practised with your camera and have an assistant with you to help organise people.

Forget the Canon, it won't help at all. I would go further and refuse the job if I couldn't use my own gear.

Hope that helps!
Agree with everything John said ..... except the bit about hiring another K7 being ideal. I had a K7 before buying the K5 and when switching to the K5 it was almost as if I was still using the K7 in terms of functionality, totally intuitive. The menu is a little different but you can learn that in an hour or less. I'd hire a K5 as your main camera and use the K7 as your back-up / 2nd camera.

17-50 on the K5, 70-200 on the K7 and your other two lenses in your pockets.

Comment by Frogfish posted on Wedding dilemma... at 24/04/2012 - 06:12

Frogfish
Why a prime ? Most non-DSLR users are well versed in zooms (and primes confuse them) and space is often at a premium at a wedding with lots of people around.

IMO the Tamron 17-50/2.8 is the perfect lens for your brother to use, he can learn the zoom function in less than one minute and it introduces a convenience factor that a prime just doesn't possess. This is why 99% of wedding togs use zooms for most of their work !

The lens is really sharp and a great lens as many here can testify, it can be bought from Amazon : Price: £288.64 & this item Delivered FREE in the UK with Super Saver Delivery.

The f2.8 over the 35/2.4 is nothing. The versatility is priceless.

Comment by Frogfish posted on Lens for documenting / portraits at a wedding at 24/04/2012 - 05:46

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo