All Forum Comments
Comment by Don posted on Video Section at 06/06/2010 - 12:10
Don I'm just trying out what can be done, don't you never experiment?
And to be honest what if you want to have your model brighter then the ambient light on a clear sunny day, you would need a lot of flash power
and yes, studio strobes have the power....
I wasn't putting you down, was just wondering why and what you were trying to achieve.......
Comment by Don posted on Faster syncspeed? at 20/05/2010 - 01:59
sunny sixteen rule:
iso 100, 1/125 sec shutter, and f16 aperture....
any flash can be used outdoors for fill... to get a wider aperture and faster shutter combo, use a reflector in stead of flash...
so I've never had to solve this "Problem" as it has never been a problem for me.....
Why go to so much trouble?
Comment by Don posted on Faster syncspeed? at 18/05/2010 - 20:20
my only other suggestions are:
try on camera p-ttl flash set to HS with off camera flash using a "Smart" optical slave that will ignore the pre-flash...
or use a second pentax p-ttl flash set to HS.....
Comment by Don posted on Faster syncspeed? at 18/05/2010 - 19:27
shoot a white wall in the dark, with your flash... starting at the current synch speed and f8 and moving up in increments from there until you get a solid black frame....
now look at each frame to see how much black you got in each frame... the black is not gonna have any flash lighting anything...
if (let us just pretend for example) 1/400 of a second gets you a half white half black frame then you know how to frame your outdoor shot.... the part of the frame that is lit by your flash is where your subject you are trying to light should be.... hold your camera vertically or upside down for example so the flash lights your subject and the part of the frame you know your flash isn't going to light is say blue sky, for one example...
does that make any sense to you?
Comment by Don posted on Faster syncspeed? at 18/05/2010 - 18:37
Comment by Don posted on Reflector for wedding at 12/05/2010 - 13:01
Comment by Don posted on rumor of Pentax K5 ??? at 07/05/2010 - 17:47
If I was buying one of these evil cameras, my priority would be value. It should be cheaper than a true DSLR. Second in my mind would be IQ which should be the best available for the price. Third would be lens choice. Size would be my last consideration - as long as it was more compact than the smallest true DSLR.
So retaining the K-mount and apsc sensor would be a good thing in my book, at least compensating for the less compact size, providing the savings from not including a mirror were passed on in the price. As Don says, the Samsung NX camera is hardly smaller than the K-x anyway.
Doing it that way would give users the comfort of knowing they can upgrade to a mirror DSLR if they want in the future and retain their lenses.
Comment by Don posted on Pentax won't rule out mirrorless cameras. at 07/05/2010 - 16:52
Comment by Don posted on Pentax won't rule out mirrorless cameras. at 07/05/2010 - 14:38

