Don

Joined: 12th November 2005

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

Don
Pentaxophile wrote:
I dunno I'm quite fond of a 'Bombay Bad Boy' pot noodle when all other avenues for getting some sort of hot meal have been exhausted. Although it's only marginally ahead of getting a tramp to vomit.
Having grown up under very harsh circumstances....
but also having learned to find my way around a kitchen...

I had made dinner for fourteen last week for example, and had several "This is the best roast beef I ever had" compliments....
as well..
I take no shame in saying I've eaten out of garbage cans at one point in my life, I've eaten things that would make dog puke...

I can honestly say this.....
The food I've appreciated the most in this life were the things that tasted best and worst.
Everything in between is too easy to forget to be thankful for.

Comment by Don posted on SPAM is good for you! at 22/12/2010 - 18:09

Don
techno-terminator wrote:
Well those two links should cheer some folk up

Don - those spots shown on the Canon Site look very very familiar
also the customer service issue...
notice the first link to DePressing Review?
One guy get's told they have no knowledge of the problem by a rep, yet there it is on Canon's site for the"Pro" members?

Comment by Don posted on K5 Sensor Issues... at 22/12/2010 - 18:00

Don
Dangermouse wrote:
Most of the cases I've heard of here have either involved a PCSO or a rent-a-cop security guard, at least to begin with. When they encounter a photographer who responds by politely but firmly standing up for their rights they will run for a real cop, who then feels that they have to do something so as not to lose face in front of the pretend cop.

Not all PCSOs are bad (I know someone who used to be one). Problem is, the ones who are actually good at the job seem to leave pretty rapidly as the sheer idiotic bureaucracy and petty management drives them spare.
I feel there are two things that work against an honest cop:

one being the police work environment is taylor made from the ground up to encourage criminal activity...
Brotherhood mentality.
paramilitary styled structure.
Code of silence....
not much difference than the organized mafias and biker gangs in structure...

the other issue is this....
if it takes one good cop to arrest one bad cop, then the presence of a single bad cop is proof there isn't a single good cop in the entire detachment.

No sympathy from me, these people get paid to uphold the law, not only should they obey the law and serve the people who pay thier salaries, they should setting a higher example for conduct for others to follow.

Comment by Don posted on The real reason Police want to treat photographers like terrorists. at 22/12/2010 - 17:46

Don
here's one for you people that think Pentax is the only one having af issues:
canon af problems

Comment by Don posted on K5 Sensor Issues... at 22/12/2010 - 17:27

Don
Oggy wrote:
Don wrote:
...you are aware canon is having the same issues? completely different sensor, and they are getting oil fling off the mirror assembly onto the sensors...
Where did you hear that Don?
link
for one..
but officially:
canon uk
now don't those spots look familiar?

Comment by Don posted on K5 Sensor Issues... at 22/12/2010 - 17:13

Don
Pentaxophile wrote:
What I don't get is that police seem more concerned about DSLRs than the sort of gear these student protesters -and protesters in general these days - are using. i.e. cameraphones. So I don't think this is the 'real reason' police treat photographers like terrorists.
Knee jerk reactions often come from a place of fear and fear is seldom gonna cause a rational reaction. up until very recently, cell phone cameras always were inferior quality and carried with them deniability... as in "You can't prove WHO is in that video/photo" where as the bigger cameras could be enlarged and identifiable images made.
My boy with his cell phone can prove there was a cop beating on somebody.
My hd camcorder can likely prove the identities of the cop and the victim.
My d-slr can make a blow up of the cops badge number....
all from across the street...
I'm sure the logic involved goes like this... you arrest the guy with the big camera, and all the others put thiers away, or don't come forward fearing they'll be arrested too.

Comment by Don posted on The real reason Police want to treat photographers like terrorists. at 22/12/2010 - 16:40

Don
Dangermouse wrote:
The Police do have an alternate problem (which has been sighted at numerous riots here):

Self-styled activist throws self on floor kicking and screaming, while colleague films this. Later on they'll edit the tape to show as "police brutality". This technique has been seen multiple times during the same protest by the same actor. You also get the ones who will goad a cop for ages then cut the footage to make it look like an unprovoked shove.

Still not a reason for obstructing public photography, but I would like to see all Police carrying helmet cameras to protect themselves against these tactics. It'd keep both sides honest.
google "Officer Bubbles" in that instance it was the cop who harassed the protestor for a prolonged period of time before charging her with assault with a deadly bubble, and resisting arrest, yet if he had simply accepted the fact that it was a peaceful protester and moved on, there would have been no incident at all...

yes it is possible that people will manipulate, but unfortunately there is ample reason to believe that cameras on police may be the last and best line of defense against police abuses of power.

Whenever there is a situation where one person is in a position of power over another the tendency is for the powerful to be the abuser.
I like your position, because really, only a corrupt police officer should fear the public carrying cameras. It is a passive, non violent means to fight back against abuses.

Comment by Don posted on The real reason Police want to treat photographers like terrorists. at 22/12/2010 - 16:32

Don
Algernon wrote:
Don wrote:
xbow wrote:
Should be some good deals on "refurbished" K5's soon!
as I wait patiently.....
Could be false economy.... instead of 2-3year Warranty
you will only get 6-12 months
true for many people....
for me...
I find that every now and then I want to upgrade for business purposes.
if there is a factory defect it will be found and fixed within the first couple months... and if it is fixed, then I would expect the camera will be relatively problem free for the life of it.

Comment by Don posted on K5 Sensor Issues... at 22/12/2010 - 15:03

Don
xbow wrote:
Should be some good deals on "refurbished" K5's soon!
as I wait patiently.....

Comment by Don posted on K5 Sensor Issues... at 22/12/2010 - 14:43

Don
PHOTOWAM64 wrote:
mille19 wrote:
PHOTOWAM64 wrote:
I had almost made up my mind to replace my * ist DL2 with a K5 but it looks as if I may have to look elsewhere shame as I have been using pentax for over 20 years as I am now on a small pension and do not want to bye in to a load of sensor problems
Regards
Photowam
I wouldn't let the sensor problems put you off. I'm sure Pentax won't be put any more cameras out there with these problems, buy from SRS if you do have problems they'll sort it.
I've been using the K5 for a couple of weeks now and would thoroughly recommend it to anyone.
Thanks but what do pentax have to say about this
regards
Photowam :
Right now, Pentax USA rep Ned Bunnell says Pentax is investigating.
People with problems need to report it to where they purchased it. As people here are saying, reputable sources like SRS are being better than good to thier customers.

Comment by Don posted on K5 Sensor Issues... at 22/12/2010 - 14:43

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo