All Forum Comments
Comment by davidstorm posted on new k5 user at 06/06/2013 - 00:07
Regards
David
Comment by davidstorm posted on K5 - Exposure bracketing with contant aperture...again at 05/06/2013 - 23:41
I suppose we should have made a bigger deal about how the crap Pentax metering caused us to waste half our time.
Regards
David
Comment by davidstorm posted on My lens is better than yours :-) at 05/06/2013 - 21:11
Have you increased contrast and blacks David?
I prefer the tones in Johns first one (the 2nd has a magenta hint that doesn't look like it could come from the natural lighting), and I can see the extra sharpness in David's version. It might be helpful David to mention what process you used for that and if it was selectively or globally applied?
Regards
David
Comment by davidstorm posted on Another Landscape for critique at 05/06/2013 - 00:07

Best wishes
David
Comment by davidstorm posted on Another Landscape for critique at 04/06/2013 - 00:27
Regards
David
Comment by davidstorm posted on Another Landscape for critique at 03/06/2013 - 23:13
Hare today gone tomorrow!...... great captures.
'
Sorry about that, but it wasn't as bad as Algi's
Cheers
David
Comment by davidstorm posted on Hare at 03/06/2013 - 20:50
It might we worth checking the colour space settings on your camera and all your processing software, make sure it's 'SRGB' all the way through the chain.
I'm not sure what processing packages you have (except lightroom), but none of the ones I've used produce yellow colour casts. White balance on the camera would be the next thing to check, failing this, the only other thing I can think is that it has been warmed up deliberately? One thing I always try to do with landscapes is to ensure that the grass looks a natural green; this usually involves lowering the yellow saturation by anything between 10 and 20%. The image could also stand quite a large hike in the levels, I would guess the Histogram on this one is balanced to the left and even the sky's highlights are not close to the tipping point in terms of their brightest areas.
It be nice to know what camera settings were used, i.e. aperture and shutter speed. The image is a little 'soft' in the foreground, although the background detail looks sharper. I know you've asked about other lens alternatives for landscapes in the past and it may be worth having a go with a cheaper old manual focus lens, something like a Pentax-M 28mm F3.5 which should produce sharper images.
I hope you don't think I'm being over critical, I'm just trying to offer some useful suggestions. You clearly have an 'eye' for landscapes, but other elements are holding you back at present; once you find the 'right' way for you I think your images will fly.
Regards
David
Comment by davidstorm posted on Another Landscape for critique at 03/06/2013 - 20:44
Regards
David
Comment by davidstorm posted on Sweet spot ? at 02/06/2013 - 22:24
Regards
David
Comment by davidstorm posted on Comments Please at 02/06/2013 - 22:12


Regards
David