All Forum Comments
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on Just a pictutre or two at 23/11/2006 - 14:39
The Uniloc is no lighter than the 055 (at least it doesn't seem to be, might just be because it's bulkier), so as an all-rounder, the Manfrotto is probably a better bet, certainly with the height advantage. I don't know how high the 190 goes, but it's definitely lighter. Best thing is to get yourself into a shop somewhere and try some out!
Cheers,
Dan
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on Just a pictutre or two at 01/11/2006 - 12:19
Just a point - one has to be a linear polariser. The other can be circ or linear.
Will try it out though, see what happens.
Cheers,
Dan
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on Just a pictutre or two at 30/10/2006 - 13:58
re polarizers, I'd been wanting to try that "infinitely adjustible" ND filter trick, using two stacked, so i was thinking of the cost of one and doubling it, for every lens I own...duh
You wouldn't be able to mount two Cokin type polarisers in a holder - they use a special slot that's wider than the others, so you might still have to get a screw in one for the front of the lens, then fit the cokin holder to that. I've got a 52mm one around somewhere, might have to give it a try...
Cheers,
Dan
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on Just a pictutre or two at 30/10/2006 - 11:43
I have used a Uniloc tripod for about 5 years, and have found it superb for macro work - basically the same design as the Benbo, but to me it was more solid than the Benbo at the same price point. However, a few weeks back, on my first day on holiday in Cornwall, having lugged the thing from the top of a cliff to the rocky cove at the bottom, the 'bent bolt' decided to lose it's thread when I tightened the handle, and I couldn't lock it in place.
Uniloc were very good at getting a new bolt to me, arrived next day, but the handle wouldn't screw onto that properly (seems like a slightly different pitch to the thread), so I was forced to find myself a replacement, although I'll still get the Uniloc sorted.
I considered the Manfrotto 190ProB, but really wanted something that would extend to around head-height without using the centre column (I'm 6'2", hence I went for the 055 (with a head and camera on top, it's nearly up to eye level).
Took a bit of getting used to after the Uniloc, and I still find it slower to get low down, but it is nice and solid, just not as flexible. No doubt though it would have been better than the Uniloc when I was balanced on the roof of a Landrover, trying to get the legs pointing in the right direction, whilst in a blustery snow shower, getting set up for a panoramic of the view from Fingringhoe Wick in Essex. The things we do for art (or cash ).
Dan
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on Just a pictutre or two at 30/10/2006 - 11:36
...might take your advice and pauper myself for a polariser for it.
What tripod are you using for the macros btw?
I use a Manfrotto 488RC2 ball and socket head, which has two knobs - one that loosens the b&s and allows full movement, and another that just loosens the head and allows it to rotate. Very handy for small adjustments, and also for doing the panoramic shots - you just level the tripod (using the built in spirit level), then level the camera (using a hotshoe mounted spirit level), and then rotate the head. Matching up images is easy then.
Mac, I'll sort some out!
Dan
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on Just a pictutre or two at 18/10/2006 - 16:41
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on Just a pictutre or two at 17/10/2006 - 22:24
Hmm, never thought to try a polariser filter on a macro lens. 'scuse me while i go and give it a try!
I have to say I use a polariser around 90% of the time.
Thanks again
Dan
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on Just a pictutre or two at 17/10/2006 - 22:00
Brian, you're not a teacher are you? Sounded like a school report.
These are just the sort of shots I love to take, and I think there are few places I like to be than in a damp woodland with a camera.
I think one of my most useful accessories I have is an old pair of camo trousers - I really don't mind getting the knees wet and muddy!
But the polariser makes such a difference, wouldn't be without it.
Dan
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on Just a pictutre or two at 16/10/2006 - 23:18
Yes, it does make your eyes go funny - I'm assuming that's a filter you've done in photoshop, not a bad advert for the 550's lens!
I went up to Edinburgh to visit a friend, who lives in a small village a stones throw from the Firth of Forth, so I had the intention of taking shots of more rural areas, in fact the nearest I got to the city was Cramond. A few shots below, which in no way enforce the stereotype of the Scottish weather...

Toadstools, istD, Sigma 105mm macro, Polariser, tripod, flash with diffuser.

Dew-laden grass, istD, Sigma 105mm macro, Polariser, tripod.

Beecraig Country Park, istD, 16-45mm, Polariser, tripod.

Beecraig Country Park, istD, 50mm, Polariser, tripod (six images stitched in PS - original dimensions 9183x 2971).

Toadstool, istD, Sigma 105mm macro, Polariser, tripod.
Had a great time in just a few days - must go back for longer. It's not an area I've visited before, just passed through on the way to the Highlands.
Cheers,
Dan
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on Just a pictutre or two at 15/10/2006 - 20:07


istD, 105mm Macro, f/6.7, reflector, manfrotto 055ProB tripod.
istD, 105mm Macro, f/8, manfrotto 055ProB tripod.
istD, 16-45mm, f/8, reflector, impending rain, manfrotto 055ProB tripod.
Absolutely tipped it down after the third image. Sat to wait it out, but the light was getting worse, and no sign of rain abating.
Still, had a good time while it lasted.
Dan
EDIT: Should have added 'Polariser' to each of the captions!