All Forum Comments
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Camera Lens Mug at 07/07/2011 - 19:10
It'll probably be horrible, but I'll give it a try as I have the bits in the spares box.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Another pointless thread at 07/07/2011 - 17:26
There is a reason for this beyond shine - apparently Subaru paint is fairly thin so I reckon a good thick layer of polish should give it a fighting chance on our salty roads.
Now to wait for a dry, still, warm day to fit the window tint film. This is either going to be great or a complete disaster!
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Another pointless thread at 07/07/2011 - 16:20
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Camera Lens Mug at 07/07/2011 - 14:22
It being a Cannon, you'll get a lot of 'bang for your buck'.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Possibly going to switch brands at 07/07/2011 - 14:21
There do seem to be slight variations in what's on offer. The one I ordered has a top resembling a lens cap, but I've also seen tops which look like the front of the lens or indeed a lens hood. Some don't have the proper name on, presumably as they're worried about being sued.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Camera Lens Mug at 07/07/2011 - 12:05
Should be brilliant for winding up pros when you're shooting with a Pentax and apparently drinking from a Canon 70-200mm!
Edit, just ordered a 24-105mm replica for £6. It has a stainless steel liner so should be usable. I thought the taller versions might be a bit unstable when full!
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Camera Lens Mug at 07/07/2011 - 11:21
I paid £50 for mine a couple of years ago and it is pretty much mint, £30-£40 seems a more common price though. I've seen a few priced at £33 or so BIN.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on advice re lens values... at 07/07/2011 - 10:13
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Possibly going to switch brands at 07/07/2011 - 10:10
That's our ridiculous legal system for you. Even the unlucky people who paid for things in the last few days will only recover a few pennies on the pound. Seems a bit fraudulent if you ask me, the operators of Camerabox must have known they were about to go under yet they continued taking payments. How can it be legal to take those payments in the last few days, knowing you are about to go bust and won't be able to honour any deliveries, but then keep the money and use it to pay off other creditors?
Germany seems rather notorious for this - banks supporting firms no matter what, even when the losses are ongoing and the firm shows incredible arrogance in their refusal to address their management/manufacturing/marketing/pricing problems which are causing the losses.
Naturally we have no idea whether any of this applies to Camerabox. They could equally well have been the victims of a similar bank stunt to that pulled on someone I met a while ago whose accounts were frozen despite their having steady cashflow and a full order book. In their case, the bank wasn't happy with the way they were ploughing the profits back into growing the business rather than leaving them in the bank (not much money for a bank there...)
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Camerabox go under at 07/07/2011 - 10:09


Depending on how good it is I may well buy more of them. Looking forward to observing the reactions to a steaming lens of tea!