All Forum Comments
Comment by Dangermouse posted on M50f1.7 problem at 17/12/2009 - 19:53
Anyone see the news item a day or two ago about a terrorist suspect who'd been filming things with his mobile phone and commenting on them as potential targets? Did it seem like a carefully managed slap down against the photographers rights campaign to anyone else?
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Another Arrest at 17/12/2009 - 11:29
Welcome to the MX owners club.
I take it you've read all the threads on this body and how awful it is to use, how it doesn't feel right in the hand and how the size gets in the way....
.... only joking...
IMHO the best 'M' body ever made.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Industar 50mm f3.5 "pancake" - anyone have one? at 17/12/2009 - 11:08
If I found a good one for £60 or less I would consider it, but I'm not paying the £100-£150 I've seen quoted. For similar money I could buy an M 50mm f1.4 which is a far better lens and would also work well with my newly acquired MX.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Industar 50mm f3.5 "pancake" - anyone have one? at 17/12/2009 - 00:47
Comment by Dangermouse posted on And all because I bought a K-x , more questions at 16/12/2009 - 15:53
I find it terribly sad that Jessops now only seem interested in selling memory cards, batteries, and paper to the point and shoot compact crowd. I instinctively looked at their site while finding the best price for a K-m, only to find no Pentax gear whatsoever and that they've completely dropped all used equipment. I guess they must have been hit badly by ebay, as people can cut out the middle man and get the full price for their unwanted kit rather than what a dealer offers (and then adds their mark-up to).
Comment by Dangermouse posted on A good laugh... at 16/12/2009 - 12:23
I'm also quite inclined to hunt out a 35mm lens (M or K series), as with the crop factor that would be very close to a 50mm on digital. They often seem to go for sensible money too.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Industar 50mm f3.5 "pancake" - anyone have one? at 15/12/2009 - 19:54
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Industar 50mm f3.5 "pancake" - anyone have one? at 15/12/2009 - 19:38
I realise that I'd need an M42 adapter, in fact I'd probably be looking at one of the 3rd party ones with a view to using it to convert the lens to a K mount. This trick would avoid the problems some have had with non-genuine adapters getting stuck on Pentax bodies, as I'd remove the clip from the adapter and use a spare lens mount to mark and drill a hole for the locking pin.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Industar 50mm f3.5 "pancake" - anyone have one? at 15/12/2009 - 19:25
Oddly, I'd rather buy an LX than a K7 at the moment. DSLRs will always go from being state of the art to last year's model, the LX is pretty much the ultimate film SLR.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on So what's a Pro Camera vs. an entry Level. at 15/12/2009 - 13:26


I really wouldn't fiddle with a zoom, all I did with the 50s was to unscrew the front element group and clean the mould off the elements with a cotton bud dipped in vinegar.