M50f1.7 problem
To be honest it is hard to see any difference in lens curvature looking at a side view of that lens.
Me super, MX, LX, K5,DA 18-55WR, DA 17-70, DA 55-300, DA40 Ltd, FA50 1.4, Samsung D-Xenon 12-24,Samsung 100mm macro M50 1.7(x3), M28 3.5, M35 2.8, M100macro f4, M135 3.5(+others)
Four elements in three groups.
Front group is two elements together - convex face to the front.
Center group - concave face to the rear.
Rear group - convex face to the rear.
The first quick check is whether it will focus to infinity - and with infinity somewhere near the index mark on the barrel.
Hope this helps
Geoff
X-5
istDS
K2000
P50.
Lenses Digital: 50-200, 18-55 KAF: 28-80.
Lenses KA & K: SMC-KA f2.0, SMC-K f1.4, SMC-K f1.7 Tokina KA 28-70 , SMC Pentax 70-210 F4, Sigma KA 75-300 , Hanimex 500mm Mirror, and the Tamron Adaptall-2 stuff.
and then there's all the M42 kit, and the accessories ...
It's probably the middle (single) lens. Flip that over and give it another try. Don't ask me how I know......
To be honest it is hard to see any difference in lens curvature looking at a side view of that lens.
I'll give it a go Ta.
Stu - K10D | DFA 100/2.8 Macro | DA 55-300 | AF-360FGZ |
So much to learn... So little time !
It's probably the middle (single) lens. Flip that over and give it another try. Don't ask me how I know......
To be honest it is hard to see any difference in lens curvature looking at a side view of that lens.
The third one maybe?

If Stefan's cross-section is the right one (and my recollection is just plain wrong ) then it looks like most of the bits are of different diameters.
It is hard to see how the lens would assemble (and still feel right) unless it's the double element (fourth group).
Lets check - what do you mean by "won't focus properly"?
- when looking through the eyepiece across the whole range of adjustment?
- marks on the lens barrel don't line up the way that they should?
That's two different problems.
Geoff
X-5
istDS
K2000
P50.
Lenses Digital: 50-200, 18-55 KAF: 28-80.
Lenses KA & K: SMC-KA f2.0, SMC-K f1.4, SMC-K f1.7 Tokina KA 28-70 , SMC Pentax 70-210 F4, Sigma KA 75-300 , Hanimex 500mm Mirror, and the Tamron Adaptall-2 stuff.
and then there's all the M42 kit, and the accessories ...
Geoff it's 6 elements in 5 groups, still good try I would not even start to guest out of my head. link
It's probably the middle (single) lens. Flip that over and give it another try. Don't ask me how I know......
To be honest it is hard to see any difference in lens curvature looking at a side view of that lens.
The third one maybe?

It seemed to focus ok, but when I viewed the images later I noticed I hadn't got centre AND egde in focus at the same time !?
The only two that will reverse (for mechanical reasons) are the front and rear. Tried reversing each of those, maybe I should do both !?
Will try tomorrow, too dark to do infinity shots now
Ta
Stu - K10D | DFA 100/2.8 Macro | DA 55-300 | AF-360FGZ |
So much to learn... So little time !
Guess my memory isn't what it used to be. Oldtimers disease......
Same symptoms, centre sharp edges way out.
Me super, MX, LX, K5,DA 18-55WR, DA 17-70, DA 55-300, DA40 Ltd, FA50 1.4, Samsung D-Xenon 12-24,Samsung 100mm macro M50 1.7(x3), M28 3.5, M35 2.8, M100macro f4, M135 3.5(+others)
In particular, optical glass is very soft, so if you over-tighten the elements then you can actually distort the shape and ruin the quality of the lens. Also, how can you be sure the element is centred correctly?
If anyone told me they had dismantled and cleaned a lens, I certainly wouldn't buy it.
However as this was only a fiver I figured it was worth the risk. I did put witness marks on all the threads before I started disassembly though.
I'm glad to say it came out very well, ( at the second attempt!)
In fact I can't tell it apart from my other two 1.7's, beginners luck no doubt.
Thankfully the 50mm primes are a fairly simple design. Wouldn't want to try a zoom
Me super, MX, LX, K5,DA 18-55WR, DA 17-70, DA 55-300, DA40 Ltd, FA50 1.4, Samsung D-Xenon 12-24,Samsung 100mm macro M50 1.7(x3), M28 3.5, M35 2.8, M100macro f4, M135 3.5(+others)
I really wouldn't fiddle with a zoom, all I did with the 50s was to unscrew the front element group and clean the mould off the elements with a cotton bud dipped in vinegar.
Shooting the Welsh Wilderness with K-m, KX, MX, ME Super and assorted lenses.
Shooting the Welsh Wilderness with K-m, KX, MX, ME Super and assorted lenses.
Lenses are precision made, so taking them apart is potentially full of woes.
In particular, optical glass is very soft, so if you over-tighten the elements then you can actually distort the shape and ruin the quality of the lens. Also, how can you be sure the element is centred correctly?
If anyone told me they had dismantled and cleaned a lens, I certainly wouldn't buy it.
The lens was full of fungus and cost me a fiver, so nothing lost, I am however surprised at your comments, I assumed the lens would reseat itself naturally when replaced. Obviously not, maybe that's the problem, I'll have a look
Stu - K10D | DFA 100/2.8 Macro | DA 55-300 | AF-360FGZ |
So much to learn... So little time !
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



385 posts
16 years
UK
Can anyone help ? maybe an exploded view showing element curvatures !? Please
.
Stu - K10D | DFA 100/2.8 Macro | DA 55-300 | AF-360FGZ |
So much to learn... So little time !