All Forum Comments
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Film developing by mail at 05/09/2010 - 17:19
The 2x TC I have is a lot more use as an extension tube with auto contacts however!
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Windolene at 05/09/2010 - 16:28
I use Ilford HP5 and Microphen developer along with their own fixer, which seems a pretty tolerant combination and works perfectly when I time the various stages using a standard wristwatch. It takes roughly 15mins to develop a film from loading it to hanging it up to dry. As you have to give the knob a half turn every two seconds to agitate the film you do not want to use anything requiring a long developing time - HP5 and Microphen works out at 6mins 30secs, then 5mins in the fixer. As it is I tend to get an annoying blister on my right thumb from turning the knob!
The Rondinax tanks are not hugely common. There are versions for 35mm and 120 film, and I know of two versions of the 35mm one. Mine is the earlier Bakelite one which could date from any time between the 1920s to the 1960s judging by the box design, the later one has a large white plastic knob in place of the black one on this example and I'm given to understand that it's made from a more modern plastic.
I tend to pre-warm mine to 20C by putting it in the airing cupboard for a while, then process the film.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Film developing by mail at 05/09/2010 - 00:40
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Windolene at 04/09/2010 - 21:13
See this photo to see what I mean - you need to make sure that the edges of the film curve downwards as it goes into the guide. There is enough leader to ensure this before you put the lid on and wind the rest of the film in.

Comment by Dangermouse posted on Film developing by mail at 04/09/2010 - 21:09
What I don't know is whether the flash's light sensor plays any role. I know with the original Auto flashes (AF160, AF200S) it did, as you were effectively handing over metering to the flashgun which would give the correct light output for a good exposure providing that you had set the camera as it expected.
I may have to put a finger over the sensor and see what effect it has!
Edit, tried that, it does seem to make a difference. The shot taken with a finger over the sensor was overexposed, which would suggest that it does vary the output.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Cobra 450af what will happen at 04/09/2010 - 15:40
I mention this as I've just found a couple of harmless-looking tiny flashes running from 2 AAs which have trigger voltages of over 200V! Needless to say neither will be going anywhere near my K-m. It appears that Pentax units are safe, although you should check. You can pick up a multimeter for £5 and it'll be handy for diagnosing faults in all sorts of things.
I suspect you're using the same mode as my K-m and AF240Z do - it seems as though Pentax included support for the old Program flash mode (from the pre-TTL era on things like the P30T) in their DSLRs. The camera takes account of the flash, sets the right aperture according to the ISO you set, and then sets a shutter speed according to its metering.
The modern digital bodies will even work with the early AF160 - I tried mine last night while bored and found that with camera in M mode with the shutter set to 1/180 and aperture set according to the table on the back of the unit I got both a "flash ready" indicator light and perfect exposures while using the Auto modes on the flash. I doubt I'll use this combination much (bought it as a pocket flash for my ME Super) but it was still nice to see technology from about thirty years apart working happily together!
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Cobra 450af what will happen at 04/09/2010 - 15:08
I had one lens that wouldn't clean up at all, there was some sort of grease on the front element which the lens pen would only make a pretty pattern in. I licked a finger and wiped it gently over the surface (as I was out with no access to the normal optical cleaning spray I use), then polished clean with a soft cloth and finished off with the lens pen. Perfect!
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Windolene at 04/09/2010 - 14:54
Buying professional gear used must be a bit of a minefield as you've no idea how intensively it was used by previous owners - something like an ME Super on the other hand is quite likely to have only come out of the wardrobe for the annual holiday and maybe the odd wedding.
There is an LX 2000 on ebay at the moment (listed in Japan) for £2500 or so.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Pentax LX 24K GOLD SPECIAL VERSION 50mm f/1.2 at 04/09/2010 - 13:27
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Dream collection at 03/09/2010 - 23:42


No complaints with HP5, great film for all round use. Not much grain and tolerates my home processing.