All Forum Comments
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Which Spotmatic to go for? at 15/11/2010 - 19:12
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Another pointless thread at 15/11/2010 - 17:57
[IMG]http://i183.photobucket.com/albums/x21/Kingofthemountains/IMGP4398.jpg[/IMG]
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Which Spotmatic to go for? at 15/11/2010 - 17:54
SMC Pentax 28mm f3.5 (also the Pentax-M 28mm f3.5, which is slightly smaller and later)
SMC Pentax 120mm f2.8 (very tricky to find - I've never seen another in the year or so since I bought mine. The Pentax-M 135mm f3.5 could take its place despite being a little slower).
Going on to cheap-but-decent AF glass, the Pentax-F 80-200mm f4.7-5.6 is a pretty handy performer. It feels a bit plastic but takes sharp enough photos and doesn't take up much space in the bag. The matching 35-80mm is terrible IMO, if you want a small walkabout lens then try the Pentax-F 35-70mm or save a bit more and look at the new DA 35mm f2.4.
The obvious addition to your existing kit would be the DA or DA-L 55-300mm zoom. This has excellent reviews and would compliment the kit lens well for extra range, the DA-L version has a plastic lens mount, no quick shift focusing, and no lens hood but is optically identical to the DA version.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Wanted - selection of lenses (along with some help choosing!) at 15/11/2010 - 15:58
Remenber - you have nothing to fear except fear itself...............
Tony
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Another pointless thread at 15/11/2010 - 15:19
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Does Rain Stop Play? at 15/11/2010 - 15:18
I have a spare original metal cap on hand which will be going onto the 55/1.8, giving me the classic set of three primes to transfer between the SV and Spotmatic depending on which I feel like using.
Interesting comment about different lens behaviour on film and digital, I just got a couple of rolls of slide film back during which I used the M 40-80mm amongst other lenses. The barrel distortion of this lens doesn't seem to show up on digital, but on film I've got at least one wall which is noticably bowed in the centre!
Comment by Dangermouse posted on 1959 Pentax Auto-Takumar 55mm f/2 -v- Pentax 'A' 50mm f/1.7 at 15/11/2010 - 12:13
A 55mm f/1.8 Super-Takumar tested at the same time was very
poor
They are superbly made - mine has a slight wobble in the focus mechanism which hopefully won't show up in the test photos.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on 1959 Pentax Auto-Takumar 55mm f/2 -v- Pentax 'A' 50mm f/1.7 at 15/11/2010 - 11:27
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Wanted - selection of lenses (along with some help choosing!) at 15/11/2010 - 08:03
I'm back from Top Gear Live, was a bit difficult for photos due to lighting and sheer mass of people. On the plus side when I checked ebay this afternoon I found (and won) a Super Takumar 55/1.8 for £24 including post. Just hope it's in as good condition as the seller claims, it is in a (non-original) hard case which I usually see as a promising sign...
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Another pointless thread at 14/11/2010 - 19:27

