All Forum Comments
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Repacement bayonet fitting! at 08/02/2011 - 14:10
See, for ages I've been interested in medium format film, and thinking about it I'd probably have a lot more fun with a completely different camera than I would with a simple upgrade from what I already have. Also, I should be able to find a Bronica ETRS with a few toys for about the same from a reputable dealer...
The ability to shoot 35mm, 120 and polaroid film on the same camera by swapping backs does appeal, in fact the dealer I looked at had a polaroid back as well as a body/75mm lens/metered viewfinder/speed grip/120 back kit. It'd end up costing me about £430 all in compared to £490 for a K-r (£369 for the kit and another £55 for the polaroid back).
I did originally consider that a bit steep but when you think that the £200 ebay specials don't usually have the grip, or the metered prism (which will rapidly mop up your £170 saving), plus if it comes from a dealer I can check it thoroughly before taking it home.
What do you lot think - is there logic here? I will still be playing with Pentax 35mm gear and my K-m, but fancy something completely different.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Another pointless thread at 08/02/2011 - 14:04
The ME F is a bit of an oddball. You can take the focusing screen out from the front by undoing a couple of tiny screws where the prism protrudes down into the mirror box, just like the MG. I really wish they'd made all the M series that way as I've got a couple with appalling dust or marks on the screen, but can't get the part off for cleaning or replacement with a good spare.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on me thinks this is a hybrid MEF at 08/02/2011 - 13:54
I've got one, I quite like it (barrel distortion aside, and that only shows in subjects with long straight lines). I wouldn't have paid more than the £20 it cost me though.
Over time this will push prices higher. People now think this is what they're worth and will push auction final bids up to similar levels because that's how much it now costs to get hold of the widget in question. It's like one seller and their ridiculous prices for things like lens caps (which they've removed from lenses they sell and replaced with cheap generic ones - if you want the complete lens with all the original trimmings you pay even more!) Now everyone thinks that those are the correct prices and sets theirs accordingly.
My last bargain was a minty black ME with original case, strap, manual, and a perfect 50mm f1.7 with original cap for £20 a couple of weeks ago.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Are Pentax getting too popular? at 08/02/2011 - 08:08
no, more like a 911 GT2. Expensive, yes, Temperamental, yes, but a pussycat when required and difficult and costly to get the best out of.
It's not a Hasselblad or Phase One, so there are lots of other options out there - this is actually reasonably priced for teh level of performance on offer (hence the Porsche simile...).
Bret
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Lot of money at 07/02/2011 - 23:09
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Program-A at 07/02/2011 - 22:51
It's a tool of the trade for professionals really. £9k is steep but as a business expense for something which will probably repay its purchase price long before it wears out it makes sense.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Lot of money at 07/02/2011 - 16:15
Try using Av mode with manual ISO. Set ISO to 800 or 1600 as a starting point and the largest aperture (smallest number) the lens will support, and see what shutter speed you get. With a 200mm lens you really need to get it up around the 1/250 mark to avoid shake and freeze action fairly well.
The K-x does suffer a bit from only having one control wheel, which makes it a bit of a handful in M (to the extent that I only use M on my similar K-m for flash photography). Av gives you control over aperture, ISO and white balance, which are the main things affecting how your photos turn out.
In general higher ISOs will produce more noise in images - the K-x was a big step forward here but it's still a case of the lower the better.
The selected aperture not only controls how much light reaches the sensor, but also the depth of field - how much closer to you or further away from you than the subject remains in focus. Try finding a brick wall, tiles, or anything else with a repeating pattern and taking photos of it at various apertures. You should be able to pick this up pretty rapidly with a bit of experimentation.
Most importantly have a play. It costs nothing to try and see what works with digital. Look for photos online of Speedway racing and see if they have Exif data (which shows what settings the photographer used), most photo sharing sites include this.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Advice please at 07/02/2011 - 16:07
There are a few particularly nice lenses from the K, M, and A series, just don't be dragged into paying stupid money for them.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Program-A at 07/02/2011 - 14:15
My advice for film would be to have a look at the Ilford website. They offer a variety of B&W films, one of which can be processed using the same chemicals and techniques as colour negative film so you can safely take it to your local Boots if specialist processing is unavailable. Talking of Boots, they still sell process paid colour slide film which is good for a bit of nostalgia.
If you want to shoot landscapes with it I'd recommend looking for a wider angle lens. Try the Pentax-M 28mm f3.5 (better than the f2.8 version) if you can find one, the Program A will work with this in Av or M modes and it will also fit your K-x. A series lenses like your 50mm will tend to cost more as they're easier to use on DSLRs, but the Program A has no trouble using any lens. Just stick to lenses which have SMC Pentax on, as they have made cheaper lenses with lesser coatings which aren't as nice (and given they seem to fetch similar prices it's not worth buying the non-SMC stuff).
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Program-A at 07/02/2011 - 12:59

