All Forum Comments
Comment by ChrisA posted on Colour banding shooting into the sun at 05/10/2007 - 13:31
It has to do with clipping due to an overexposed area of sky.
As it happens, I was shooting RAW+ for much of the trip, so I have the PEF for this shot. I'll see what I can do with it.
Comment by ChrisA posted on Colour banding shooting into the sun at 05/10/2007 - 13:27
I'm still interested, though, in why the transition from dark to overexposed seems to go in bands of colour.
Here's another example. It's the Rialto Tower in Melbourne, and the sun is quite low and behind the building, hence the way the blue sky is washed out towards the bottom.
However, between the blue of the sky at the top and the white at the bottom, there's what looks to me like a turquoise band (as in the earlier shot), which makes the otherwise relatively inoffensive transition from blue to white quite unattractive.
Any ideas as to the cause specifically of the unnatural transition?

Comment by ChrisA posted on Colour banding shooting into the sun at 05/10/2007 - 12:51
However, what I'm interested in is the colour banding at the top right. The actual colour of the sky was blue - it was a clear sunny day with excellent visibility.
K10D, DA 18-55 @ 18mm, F5.6 and 1/125.
Any ideas what causes it?

Comment by ChrisA posted on Colour banding shooting into the sun at 03/10/2007 - 13:02
Much more fun taking the photos in the air than on the ground and the best lens is in the 35-85mm bracket.
Even more so in single-pilot ops with no autopilot
Comment by ChrisA posted on Sigma Lenses at 18/10/2007 - 10:40
It's the non-HSM version - I knew that before I ordered it
Comment by ChrisA posted on Sigma Lenses at 16/10/2007 - 17:51
stevejcoe,
Many thanks for that. Just got off the phone from Microglobe and I should have the lens tomorrow
If it's for real, then this really is excellent news. At risk of stating the obvious, it means Sigma believe that there's money in it for them.
We can expect a swift review, then ?
Edit: Hmm. Pentax is in the list of mounts for it on the Sigma website., but it does say there that:
"(the HSM is only available for AF Canon, Nikon, Four Thirds and Sigma Mounts)."
So either the website is out of date, or it might be worth calling Microglobe back to confirm what you're getting.
Comment by ChrisA posted on Sigma Lenses at 16/10/2007 - 17:29
Maybe Sigma are adapting the 50-500mm to use SDM
http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/104834-post6.html
No idea as to the truth of the claim though.
Comment by ChrisA posted on Sigma Lenses at 15/10/2007 - 13:25
If you are interested drop me a line - and I can send you some images from the 250-300 mm range. Just to let you kniw how it preforms.
So if Ziggles (or anyone else for that matter) is interested, feel free to PM me.
Comment by ChrisA posted on Pentax 75-300mm F4.5-5.8 J P-FA SMC AL Silver Lens at 02/10/2007 - 08:29
For more magnification try a wide angle lens reversed, such as a 28mm. The magnification is startling.
Reversed on to extension tubes it's even more amazing, and not all that difficult to do.
x1.9 just with the lens reversed, and up to x4 reversed on to a set of extension tubes.
Comment by ChrisA posted on Macro Bellows with K10D? at 06/10/2007 - 07:31


Silkypix can deal with the situation - if you ETTR and use the exposure compensation to bring the main part of the image back in line, the dynamic range adjustment can tweak how the resultant clips are handled (but it can't recover what's been lost at the capture stage).
Hope that helps a touch!
Thanks again guys.