All Forum Comments
Comment by ChrisA posted on Morning stroll with a bigma at 16/12/2007 - 18:36
How clever of Pentax to sell a camera with a minimum ISO of 200 and give the guide number at ISO 100 and not tell you a conversion factor is needed. I'm going to bin the manual or rip it up and put the pages on a nail in the outside loo.
Imperfect though they may be, I think to rant thus at the Pentax manuals is a little unreasonable.
Comment by ChrisA posted on Problems with built in flash at 16/12/2007 - 22:50
I have read the manual as I stated and it clearly states that P-TTL is only available with the 360 & 540 flash units and I am talking about the internal flash. How am I supposed to know the pre flash happens with this too when the manual written by Pentax for a Pentax camera does not state this.
It is a bit obscure. What they mean is that you can't get P-TTL with any other external guns other than the two Pentax P-TTL compatible guns. Even that's no longer true, of course, since there are now at least three Sigma P-TTL guns, two Samsung ones, and a Metz, that are all compatible with P-TTL, apart from the AF360 and AF540 FGZs. And there's the baby Pentax P-TTL gun too (AF200? 220?)
I guess I was just lucky - I saw the flash in the viewfinder, thought "huh?", just as you did, then I took a picture looking at the flash unit and saw both flashes. Which made me do a bit more reading.
It's a lot clearer from the flash gun manuals, but I do agree that the K10/100D manuals don't exactly explain what P-TTL really is.
Comment by ChrisA posted on Problems with built in flash at 15/12/2007 - 23:57
To be honest, the manual can be a bit vague from time to time.
But you see P-TTL in the manuals, all over the forums, etc...
.. and it never occurs to you to wonder what 'P' stands for?
Comment by ChrisA posted on Problems with built in flash at 15/12/2007 - 22:25
Nevertheless, the great spirits on high have come to me in a vision, and declared in other-worldly tones, that I, humble and undeserving though I be, may reveal it to you now.
It is as follows:
Pick up the inspired word, that is the book called "Operating Manual".
Open its hallowed pages (take care lest the light therefrom blind you with its purging brightness).
Read therein and marvel at the wisdom contained. Absorb its great knowledge, hitherto unimagined.
Few have the courage to venture between those covers, yet great enlightenment may come, to those who dare.
Comment by ChrisA posted on Problems with built in flash at 15/12/2007 - 20:47
Comment by ChrisA posted on Help K10D Needs Repairing (Fixed) at 15/12/2007 - 17:29
actually I thought the K10D held its price quite well, it didn't really budge from the £600 I paid for mine for several months. Granted it has now tumbled somewhat, but in these days of electronics which are out of date before they hit the shops, it did pretty well.
It's under £500 now.
I think, if the new one comes out in Jan 2008, I might stick with the K10D for a while at least for nine months or so. Once I've got a couple more lenses, I might feel different!!
Wait and see what DPR says about it, though, eh, George?
I think for me, the next £1k of my photographic budget (which is currently zero ) will be for glass, not a body.


I think I'm seeing some kind of CA in some of these (though could easily be me shaking too much - see the second Robin)
I've seen something very similar to this before, also on twigs. This was taken with the Pentax SMC-A 400mm:
http://i162.photobucket.com/albums/t244/chris5gd/Public/IMGP4972-2-1000sh.jpg
Note the similar strange blue on the twigs below the bird.
Can't account for it, though. I wondered if it was reflections from the rather blue bird on wet twigs, but if so it seems very bright.
Can anyone else shed any light?