All Forum Comments
Comment by chaude posted on Balkans in 2 weeks time, excited! at 16/05/2011 - 18:22
The trip's likely to involve a fair amount of time in the mountains, but also some evenings out! Can't be more excited about it though it's my first long solo journey. Even the fact of 7 exams in the way can't stop the excitment!
I'll probably be taking the K5, 10-17mm fisheye, 31mm and the 18-250mm, a mz-5 body and a olympus XA (point and shoot in the pocket!)
So has anyone done a similar trip, and would know what to expect, or else, what would they bring if they were me, and had the choice of the equipment mentioned above, plus: smcM 28mm f3.5, vivitar 55mm macro 1:1, adaptall 70-210 f3.5, and some macro tubes?
Comment by chaude posted on Balkans in 2 weeks time, excited! at 16/05/2011 - 01:56
I'll wait for Gartmore for now since he offered first as I quite fancy the sound of having a Pentax made filter (well, they're probably both made by hoya)
I'll get back to you if Gartmore's doesn't fit me but thanks for the offer
Comment by chaude posted on Wanted: 58mm UV filter at 09/05/2011 - 19:52
Comment by chaude posted on Wanted: 58mm UV filter at 09/05/2011 - 18:44
Would like one of a decent quality (e.g. Hoya Pro 1D?) but I'd see if anyone has a spare or unwanted one happy to part with before I venture onto the well known auction site! (Hopefully cheap-ish too )
Thank you!
Comment by chaude posted on Wanted: 58mm UV filter at 09/05/2011 - 11:52
Or if I walk, it'd be a late night
Comment by chaude posted on Honest comments wanted! at 08/05/2011 - 18:44
The other lenses mentioned like the 17-50 or even 16-45 or 17-70 aren't any smaller than the kit lens, won't have WR. If it ain't broke, why fix it when you're happy with it. For me, to keep it small I just got a M28mm prime, which is about half the size of the 18-55 kit lens, and it performs well enough and I only lose AF, not too important for landscapes and it's cheap as we all know. Mine was under £20.
If you really want to go down in size the limiteds seem to be the only thing that really offer a significant enough reduction in size.
Saw your thread in the classfields, have you thought about using a raynox-250 clip on converter? Keeps the size similar, and it's compatible with more than one lens. No real need to trade off the 40mm for a 35mm macro then.
Comment by chaude posted on Most used lens for landscapes / architechture at 08/05/2011 - 17:15
But now I'm using the "wide" end less and less and tend to use a M28mm f3.5 or the FA31mm for landscapes. If the view is very wide and open, a longer focal length would still be able to show the vast space but enables me to find a focus better.
Ocassionally I use the 10-17mm fisheye but often find it a bit too wide. It's better for creative and architectural shots for me.
Although, on a big field I wouldn't hesitate using the fisheye, and on the mountains I'd opt for a prime.
Comment by chaude posted on Most used lens for landscapes / architechture at 08/05/2011 - 16:55
Not sure I'll take the picture from across the road as I wouldn't want to get ran over But certainly a person in the photo would have made it a lot better. I tried it with a car but it more or less spoiled the whole thing.
And yes, Smeggy, that is the spot. well done
Comment by chaude posted on Honest comments wanted! at 07/05/2011 - 23:07
Really asking for ideas and C&C
Thanks

Comment by chaude posted on Honest comments wanted! at 07/05/2011 - 21:47


Last time when I went on a long trip to Morocco with the Km and W60, the W60 took a mere 2 pictures for the whole trip, the XA is, despite limited, a very good thing to play with and as its a fixed focal length, I will know when I can use it, and the K5 itself is versatile enough with the 18-250mm.
Promise that I'll share some pictures, but no garuntee of quality though