Comments made by cabstar - Page 186

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

Write up says low light improvements, doesn't say in AF!

Comment by cabstar posted on DxOMark report on the K-5II. at 23/11/2012 - 22:51

Asda neg and scan to cd for around £2.99 was very happy with the scans too

Comment by cabstar posted on Film Recommendations at 22/11/2012 - 23:38

hmm interesting that they find the sensor performs better than the mki and that the buffer holds more, looks like there are more improvements than Pentax let on...

Comment by cabstar posted on DxOMark report on the K-5II. at 22/11/2012 - 16:39

As always ask them budget first, get them to show their hand, do you have to provide the print??

If it is only going to be hung on the wall in a pub then Alamy

calculator comes up with £190 for the licence per year plus the cost of making the poster / print

HTH

Comment by cabstar posted on How much is a shot worth? at 22/11/2012 - 16:34

I hope they don't redesign the body, I think the k-5 is ergonomically perfect as it is.

Comment by cabstar posted on K5 still on sale at 22/11/2012 - 11:17

Aldi would you beliee do Fuji film for around £1.50 a roll..

Comment by cabstar posted on Film Recommendations at 21/11/2012 - 22:20

If the magazine has a good sub editor they should make it more professional and fit in with their style.

When I first started writing I was given a list of the magazines writing style, a dos and donts.

Maybe they can help you with this.

Comment by cabstar posted on help me please at 20/11/2012 - 23:02

I am really liking the colours from it, I was a little concerned having read many negative reviews about this lens, but so far I am really pleased with e images I am getting from it.

Comment by cabstar posted on Finally got to play properly with my DA* 16-50mm 2.8 YAY!! at 20/11/2012 - 18:07

screwdriver wrote:

cabstar wrote:
This possibly due to light transmission through the different lenses rather than any body or sensor issues...

Good point, but if I put my K to Q adapter on the Q and use the same lens on both cameras I get exactly the same result, pretty sure it's differences in the sensors, it's the only thing I can think of.

But then the lens has a different field of view which could also possibly alter aperture and shutter and ISO settings...

Comment by cabstar posted on How sensitive is your camera? at 20/11/2012 - 15:07

This possibly due to light transmission through the different lenses rather than any body or sensor issues...

Comment by cabstar posted on How sensitive is your camera? at 20/11/2012 - 12:35

Proudly supporting Pentax User

cabstar

All Forum Comments

All Forum Comments

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Proudly supporting Pentax User