All Forum Comments
Comment by bretti_kivi posted on Doubts about the K-5 ?? at 27/10/2010 - 07:12
I've just checked and my account is associated with my PP, but money is *never* taken from there, only deposited.
hypothesis: Paypal want the DD because it's more secure for them than a CC payment. CCs are subject to lots of fraud, so the CC companies will refund first, charge PP back and then they have difficulties proving that things went wrong. DD is directly with a customer, who is far less likely to argue successfully that PP are at fault. Make sense?
Bret
Comment by bretti_kivi posted on PayPal - be very careful of how you deal with them! at 26/10/2010 - 22:18
PP in Luxembourg is under the supervision of the CSSF...
http://www.cssf.lu/index.php?id=1&L=1
PP is listed under "Banks": http://www.cssf.lu/fileadmin/files/Listes/Entites_surveillees/liste_banques_1310...
Wikipedia also confirms that PP is regulated by the CSSF http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PayPal
from http://baseswiki.org/en/Banking_Ombudsman,_Luxembourg
Under Article 58 of the law of 5 April 1993 on the financial sector as amended, the CSSF in entitled to oversee any unresolved disputes between financial professionals subject to its supervision and their customers.
Hope this helps.
Bret
Comment by bretti_kivi posted on PayPal - be very careful of how you deal with them! at 26/10/2010 - 21:50
I have heard of many people who have had their fingers burned with PP, so I'd remove the DD, set up another card with, say, £50 on it, and that's ONLY for PP.
Since my Credit card got cloned in March I've used PP a lot more and it seems to work this way quite nicely. Money moves around within a couple of days and I have *some* form of comeback - also against PP via the credit card company. Even if that does take weeks...
I would also not do anything like this on the phone. Everything in writing. Takes a second longer and it's a lot cheaper to send an email or even a registered letter.
Moving funds around the €-using EU is really easy and quick with an IBAN and BIC, it's just moving them out of the UK is stupidly expensive and PP offers a cheap, quick and easy way to do this.
Just because PP is registered in Luxembourg... hmm, I suspect you can complain against them in Luxembourg, in English, too.
Bret
Comment by bretti_kivi posted on PayPal - be very careful of how you deal with them! at 26/10/2010 - 21:37
Anyone used this boom and has comments? I know I need a sandbag. I'll probably also get an adapter so I can mike it up for video.....
thanks!
Bret
Comment by bretti_kivi posted on Any experiences with a 'frotto 420? at 26/10/2010 - 19:13
7 fps jpg full quality is approx 30 images, RAW is approx 8 images.
1.6 fps jpg full quality is to "card full", RAW is approx 10 images.
Bret
It is the stated buffer capacity.
- as an after thought, now that some forum members have the K5, maybe they could put it to the test?
Best regards
The spec apparently says (for a K10D) 4 RAWs. I get 8 with an Ultra III.
If the system is designed to output just as fast as it can, then the limit is more the card and then the output speed, along with the size of the pics / datavolume.
I don't know and I doubt that Pentax will ever publish how they get the numbers they put in the paperwork; I know we don't.
The other thing: different pics have different sizes in RAW. I've seen 9MB, I've seen 16MB. Comparing apples with oranges or making things look good? Depends on your viewpoint, methinks.
Bret
Comment by bretti_kivi posted on K5 Arrived! at 26/10/2010 - 10:26
7 fps jpg full quality is approx 30 images, RAW is approx 8 images.
1.6 fps jpg full quality is to "card full", RAW is approx 10 images.
Bret
Comment by bretti_kivi posted on K5 Arrived! at 26/10/2010 - 08:13
But isn't it more important now to find out how many want to have such a section rather then already have all kinds of rules for it?
And since it's a democracy, who have made up those rules that ISO talks about?
Someone, somewhere, gets to make a decision. That decision becomes a starting point for discussion. I've seen it again and again - until someone says "this is happening like this" or tables a concrete idea, NOTHING HAPPENS. I have sooo many people here who are interested in doing something but only if it's offered to them on a plate. They won't phone, they won't ask friends, they'll wait until it happens. And then they're enthusiastic.
Start somewhere, with some ideas. They don't even have to be usable or enforceable, but without initial ideas, no-one will think about them and then someone will start whining immediately afterwards because it "doesn't wooooorkk. muuuuuuuuum!". Then it's already too late.
Hit the newbies. Why? because otherwise you get a load of newbs selling stuff or trying to advertise dodgy links and the mods have too much work. Make it easy on them if you're going to give them more work.
Quote:
Why's it unfair to paying advertisers
I think that should be obvious.
If you see paying advertiser's adverts, then fair enough. I don't.
I don't want them, I don't need them, they waste my bandwidth.
Anyone who advertises anything anywhere MUST be prepared to have their prices taken apart with the internet. If someone's offering a crappy service for a crappy price... then that's their problem. I don't see what's unfair about showing other offers on the net. It's no more than is done on a dozen different websites across the globe. The point here is you also get an opportunity to share a cool find with others who may be more interested / able to partake than you. I think that's a very positive thing.
It's also then more organised that the present where it's obvious no-one knows where to put curry's offers. IMO: If you want your users to categorise properly, give them the correct categories for what *they* are looking for and make it easy.
Bret
Comment by bretti_kivi posted on Vote on having a new ‘Leads to Deals’ Section at 25/10/2010 - 20:16
Despite the fact I like a bargain as much as anyone, I voted no.
I feel it would be unfair to paying advertisers and especially to SRS the forum sponsor.
Such a section on the forum could quickly get out of hand with spammers advertising everything under the sun, and all at someone else's expense.
Why's it unfair to paying advertisers? Because their deals have to stand up to the scrutiny of the internetz?
Anyway, decent forum software also allows the option of pre-moderation, i.e. the threads are only published after someone gives their OK.
Bret
Comment by bretti_kivi posted on Vote on having a new ‘Leads to Deals’ Section at 25/10/2010 - 19:38
Maybe but it wasn't the mods idea or the site idea to make such a thread so is it fair to make it their responsibility?
Also since when can we (members) make forum rules?
I voted no now because off the rules you know.
The last two rules are actually already in the terms of use and what's that about the first rule, why can't a newbie post a bargain?
Besides, the rules (is it rules or disclaimer?) state
3d. Links to commercial website in which the member has no interest ... are allowed
It's "merely" another forum and I think it's reasonable to ask a Mod to do their job, even if they do do it on a voluntary basis. They might well also get something out of it....
As far as the newbies are concerned... too many people register to forums to spam. For Sale sections on most forums are not open to the public, some I know you can't even see until you've got 100 (non-spam) posts.
Bret
Comment by bretti_kivi posted on Vote on having a new ‘Leads to Deals’ Section at 25/10/2010 - 19:37


Bret