bretti_kivi

Joined: 13th May 2009

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

bretti_kivi
it doesn't need anything else

If you have questions, ask, as I also use it, along with UFRaw.

Bret

Comment by bretti_kivi posted on FREE photoshop called Gimp at 09/05/2011 - 08:30

bretti_kivi
post ain't an issue, as I get boxes sent over regularly

I'll contact him and see what happens. Thanks!

Bret

Comment by bretti_kivi posted on smc-m out at infinity? at 06/05/2011 - 19:58

bretti_kivi
Okie dokie... recommendations for a place to get it sorted? Asking for a quote isn't going to break the bank

Bret

Comment by bretti_kivi posted on smc-m out at infinity? at 06/05/2011 - 13:29

bretti_kivi
I also tried a "ray of light" shot last night from the balcony at 1/1250. With my 135/3.5, the aerials on the roofs over the other side of the road are sharp and delineated - with the 28 they aren't. They should be as was f8 on both lenses and around 50m. No settings were changed.

The 28 also has very slowly reacting aperture blades. Could this have something to do with it? I'm coming to terms with the fact that this is an economic loss, but I will probably ask someone to take a look at the lens anyway.

I'm used to using LV for correcting video focus and confirming absolute focus on many different objects and agree it's rather useful.

Bret

Comment by bretti_kivi posted on smc-m out at infinity? at 06/05/2011 - 12:05

bretti_kivi
oookay, looking at it yesterday;
- it's the same on both bodies
- it's only infinity that's out
- the minimum distance is about the same as a sheet of A4 from the object to the back of the camera....

Bret

Comment by bretti_kivi posted on smc-m out at infinity? at 05/05/2011 - 11:23

bretti_kivi
like the set, though the notice on the church door irritates.....

Bret

Comment by bretti_kivi posted on Costwold Bank Holiday Walk at 05/05/2011 - 06:33

bretti_kivi
very nice set, not at all what I was expecting with the thread title

Bret

Comment by bretti_kivi posted on Day Out in Liverpool at 04/05/2011 - 21:56

bretti_kivi
grahamwalton wrote:
Are you using the cameras in manual mode with the custom function for aperture set for aperture ring use. Otherwise you will only shoot at f2.8 and have a shallow depth of field.

I assume from what you say, that you set to the infinity symbol on the lens and the pictures taken at this setting are blurred. If this is the case then you would have the same result on a manual film camera. Or are you focusing the lens by viewing through the viewfinder.

If it is not a depth of field problem, then suspect a lens assembly fault (as John suggests), or a displaced mirror in your camera.

I once dropped a SLR and my next films were all blurred. The mirror had come loose from its seating.
I haven't *proven* that there's a problem on both bodies. I set the focus at infinity and have assumed that (considering that hyperfocal appears to work very nicely) everything else was good. It's a 28/3.5 and the hyperfocal is right at the right-hand side of the infinity symbol at the moment, for f8. Which, thinking about it, is a bad thing - as that implies the focus point is over 3m and it should be 2.6.

I think I'll take a look at minimum focussing distances next and work from there. At a risk of sounding stupid, how do I take the name ring off?

thanks for the help so far!

Bret

Comment by bretti_kivi posted on smc-m out at infinity? at 04/05/2011 - 11:10

bretti_kivi
hmm. Not good. Samples, all uncropped:

this was on the K10d:
Comment Image


this is from the K5:

Comment Image


this, too:
Comment Image


100% crop:

Comment Image


thoughts?

Bret

Comment by bretti_kivi posted on smc-m out at infinity? at 04/05/2011 - 08:35

bretti_kivi
I tried to calibrate my D-FA50 last night.

Tungsten light. Aimed at a paper on the floor, no 45 degrees, just simple test.

And it went wrong. Pretty much every time I suggested something to the system, changed it, figured I'd improved it - no, it was wrong. Every time. No logic to it. 2s shutter release, SR off, tripod used, simple wrong focus.

I will try it again on the balcony this evening (it's light until well past 10 anyway).

Bret

Comment by bretti_kivi posted on K-5 AF under tungsten light issue .... at 04/05/2011 - 06:43

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo