awaldram

Joined: 1st April 2007

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

awaldram
McBrian wrote:
Doesn't work with a battery loaded in the grip

but does work with one battery in body, as mentioned AF and Green are transposed, all other functions work and it look as though the base plate profile fit is identical to the K5 series.
At a guess you don't have the grip tight enough to the mount, or the mis-fit is holding some contacts off.

Both batteries register fine and switch over on grip depletion without issue on my k3_3rd party grip

Comment by awaldram posted on D.I.Y. K3 battery grip at 04/11/2013 - 09:08

awaldram
ChrisA wrote:
Gwyn wrote:
Blythman wrote:
A grip can be the deciding factor between buying a camera or not. There are plenty that say their hands are too big for a non gripped Pentax DSLR, and there are others who believe the grip improves the balance with longer lenses.
I've always wondered about this argument for grips. Have peoples hands grow so much that a modern DSLR is too small for them? How did anyone ever manage to hold a film SLR and take great photos with it?
I've often wondered this, too

The notion that a grip improves the 'balance' is another thing I don't get. A lens sticking out the front of a camera is intrinsically unbalanced - that's why big lenses have tripod mounts.

And since the CG of the grip is immediately below the CG of the body, I don't see how the grip affect the balance at all.

So what do people actually mean by 'balance' in this context?
Comment Image

Nothing's changed from film slr to digital so I don't understand the reference to film SLR's.
I've always used a grip don't like holding a camera with my pinky floating free
Increased battery power is another big plus , maybe some people just dont use there cameras enough

As to balance the extra weight countered the lens front weight so when your on a gimbal you can achieve balance without pulling the camera to far backwards.

In hand is the same your supporting the lens with your left hand the less weight your body has the further forward your left hand needs to be and the less control you have over movement.

Comment by awaldram posted on D.I.Y. K3 battery grip at 04/11/2013 - 09:01

awaldram
johnriley wrote:
You can change the look by adjusting the in-camera parameters and by using post processing.

I think the differences you are seeing are just down to gradual improvements in the sensors and the in-camera processing. Whilst I would use the K20D in preference in terms of handling, the K-5 is better in terms of results.
IMO
cmos did not overtake ccd for low iso shooting till kx/k5 so its no wonder people with k20d or k7's keep their k10d's .

up-to iso200 the k10d offers higher IQ than both those cameras.

Comment by awaldram posted on K10D decision at 22/07/2013 - 11:48

awaldram
Algernon wrote:
awaldram wrote:
.......................

Punch through brollies makes no odds whatsoever providing the beam hits the middle 1/3 , as you'll have the flash set to
Did you fall asleep before you finished that sentence?

'
Nope I wrote nearly a page but fro some unbeknown reason when posted was seriously truncated.
Having lost the will to live a couldn't face repeating all that typing, apology to all

It was only twaddle on proving it made no odds.

Comment by awaldram posted on Umbrella/Strobist advice at 19/07/2013 - 14:45

awaldram
chrissinkpen wrote:
Having the beam of light strike the centre of the brolly seems to be an important aspect of the strobist set-up. Having a brolly set up on a separate stand seems to be the way to go. This begs the question- why doesn't somebody design a bracket that would overcome this problem-there could well be a gap in the market!
Regards
Chris
If you assume that its totally irrelevant (within reason) where the beam strikes the brolly then your question is answered "why doesn't somebody design a bracket that would overcome this problem"

There is no problem to solve.

Punch through brollies makes no odds whatsoever providing the beam hits the middle 1/3 , as you'll have the flash set to

Comment by awaldram posted on Umbrella/Strobist advice at 11/07/2013 - 12:52

awaldram
quickest way is format card take one shot.
on pc rename to imgp0000.jpg (or any other number you want.

slip back in camera take one image, format card and voila your back at 0002

Comment by awaldram posted on Oh Bugger... at 01/02/2013 - 22:04

awaldram
Smeggypants wrote:
cabstar wrote:
The k-5 autofocus is not a patch on the mkii, in low light the mki will hunt, particularly with the tamron 17-50 attached.
This is the kind of honest, no agenda, feedback I trust. I can't justify the the expense of moving from two K-5I to two K-5II, and I am waiting to investing TWO K-3s, where I assume the developments in AF performance will carry through.

I will admit the AF performance of the K-5 ( especially in low light ) leaves a lot to be desired. A shame for an otherwise superb camera.
Doesn't help my resolve any though.

Comment by awaldram posted on How low is low light? at 01/02/2013 - 21:12

awaldram
Not sure where you see 'wanting a fight' in simple facts but as you say to each his own.

Ps you seem to be repeating yourself you may want to remove the 2nd copy, saying the same thing twice is a little confusing.

I think raw performance of Pentax cameras is unlikely to alter at the price points there at the k5/ii already performs at teh same level of it competitors.

But what is likely to happen they will join the kidology of multiple sensor rapidly hitting 50+ just to con the naive.

With funding Pentax will introduce higher level cameras these cameras will have superior AF and decent predictive tracking due to fast ASIC and more cpu horsepower.

But don;t expect any changes in the K5 or k30 price point any time soon.

Comment by awaldram posted on Why do Pentax lag with autofocus? at 01/02/2013 - 19:01

awaldram
dcweather wrote:
awaldram wrote:


Nope I think all manufacturers dumb down entry level cameras to hit a price point the k30 is no exception slow cpu with insufficient memory but passes the overriding criteria .....cheap.

.
--------------------------------------------
I'm not sure where you get the idea that the K-30 is some third rate entry level camera from. You would notice very little difference from your K-5. The "experts" and others on here spent a good deal of consideration as to what would be the better buy between the two when the K-30 came out and while the older K5 retained some advantages autofocus ability and image quality were not generally considered to be the main ones.
Dave
Ere ?? Strawman alert I said it was entry level not third rate.

You tell me which Pentax Dslr is marketed below the k30 and we'll raise the assessment, its entry level.

Where is the mic input hdmi , extended bracketing , fast shutter etc etc

If you really want to see the longevity of the k30 as a system camera then have a look ate accessories in your manual..!!

Though your right its IQ from the sensor is probably better than my K5 I don't see it as a pxssing contest , The K30 is a great camera but entry level and practically throw away it also is.

It built to a price and that price is low. Considerably lower than it's RRP today.

As to the general 'worth' of the two cameras Vs each other thats a tough one.
If you want a cheap camera that does the job have no expectation or need for anything more than the basic body and a few lens then the k30 probably ticks more boxes.
If your on a budget and want a camera that will grow with your needs then the k5 is a better option as the k30 has little growing room.

With their respective feature set they both very much sit in their respective classes , just as today the 10 year old 1d still shows itself a pro camera even if unable to match the worse Sony on sale today for IQ.

Comment by awaldram posted on Why do Pentax lag with autofocus? at 01/02/2013 - 18:16

awaldram
Mike-P wrote:


The D300 is over 5 years old and its AF system has been upgraded a few times since in newer Nikon cameras. Do you not think that the K30 (which is not an entry level camera) autofocus should at least be on par with a 5 year old (no longer manufactured) body?.
Nope I think all manufacturers dumb down entry level cameras to hit a price point the k30 is no exception slow cpu with insufficient memory but passes the overriding criteria .....cheap.

The idea that these days entry level is in any way pushing the envelope is astonishing.

Your buying a product at a price level it will perform in line with its competitors no more no less.

As to the k5 these cameras AF faster than the d7000 so undoubtedly out pace the d300 where the k5 fails is in tracking where it predictive AF is a little crude

The K5ii with its expanding AF may be better but built on that same ASIC is likely to be found wanting, but then again it is 3year old tech the k5ii is built on.

Comment by awaldram posted on Why do Pentax lag with autofocus? at 01/02/2013 - 12:44

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo