All Forum Comments
Comment by Ashley posted on Unprocessed RAW v JPEG print test at 14/01/2009 - 21:56
Out of interest, does everyone here shoot raw or jpeg?
Comment by Ashley posted on Unprocessed RAW v JPEG print test at 14/01/2009 - 21:10
Comment by Ashley posted on Unprocessed RAW v JPEG print test at 14/01/2009 - 19:55
I'll have to try another program.
Comment by Ashley posted on Unprocessed RAW v JPEG print test at 14/01/2009 - 19:52
But.....I'm afraid the raw image was still sharper than the jpeg.
Comment by Ashley posted on Unprocessed RAW v JPEG print test at 14/01/2009 - 19:21
Jessops have the Tamron back in stock.
Comment by Ashley posted on Tamron 70-300 bargain..... almost! Jessops at 14/01/2009 - 17:54
I was always lead to believe at least in the magazine articles I saw on the subject some time ago that a raw image will look dull, flat and need some post processing before being useable.
The crops I printed out at 200% revealed the raw image to be the same in colour and contrast but sharper than the jpeg!
I opened the images in Photoshop Elements 6 and printed from there.
I've been using raw for a few months now but have never tried to print the unprocessed raw photo.
Has anyone else tried this?
Comment by Ashley posted on Unprocessed RAW v JPEG print test at 14/01/2009 - 17:40
Comment by Ashley posted on Tamron 70-300 bargain..... almost! Jessops at 12/01/2009 - 21:48
Thanks
Ashley
Comment by Ashley posted on Jessops 360AFD? at 04/01/2009 - 18:22
These were taken with K10D in AF.C mode.
Faster lens and loads of light were probably a big help though ...
Thanks for posting
Comment by Ashley posted on AF.C reliability on K10D at 29/12/2008 - 23:37

