All Forum Comments
Comment by Anvh posted on In your hands the K-7 vs K10D at 24/05/2009 - 18:31
My batteries are still good but if I've a weak one I'll surely try that and see if I can switch them for higher capacity batteries.
Maybe the same is true for the K-7 batteries aswell.
Comment by Anvh posted on In your hands the K-7 vs K10D at 24/05/2009 - 18:21
About my image, it was all done in lightroom 2.3 you have the same options as Adobe Raw converter 5.3 if you don't know lightroom.
I didn't had the option to tonemap so couldn't do that, all was done within a raw converter so I can putt the settings back as the original and get the same image back.
I simply wanted to go full out here with the possibilities off RAW and that was what I did.
I would have wanted to pull the blue back a bit but I already posted it.
Comment by Anvh posted on RAW challenge #3 at 24/05/2009 - 17:23
Comment by Anvh posted on 100d or 20d at 24/05/2009 - 16:53
Comment by Anvh posted on In your hands the K-7 vs K10D at 24/05/2009 - 16:42
Comment by Anvh posted on In your hands the K-7 vs K10D at 24/05/2009 - 16:39
The Tamron 28-75mm F2.8 might not be trully it, I think you're still to short if they are figthing on the other side of the ring so maybe the DA*50-135 f/2.8 or Tamron/Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 would be more useful.
They are a bit more expensive though those lenses but they are very fine to have.
I've the DA*50-135 and it's my most used lens now, it a great range when doing portrait.
Comment by Anvh posted on Photographer Noob at 24/05/2009 - 16:33
the Tamron is a lot cheaper and just as sharp as the Pentax one but you have the purple fringing problem.
That's an example of that.
It's quite easy to fix but you need to do that with almost every foto so if you want good photos straight out of the camera it wouldn't be the lens for you probable.
Comment by Anvh posted on Photographer Noob at 24/05/2009 - 16:26
Hopefully I didn't make to many mistakes in it
So Peter are you tempted to buy one?
I don't have a grip with the K10D but I think I'll get one for the K-7, depending on how big the grip is. Most of the time the camera lens on my wrist while I hold the lens and I prefer that to be under an angle.
oh btw, the battery is differend from shape but the contacts are the same so you can use the charger from the K10D and the K20D. The K-7 battry is really square while the K20D batteries have to clinderical shapes, so if the size is the same you might be able to fit the K20D batteries inside the K-7.
Comment by Anvh posted on In your hands the K-7 vs K10D at 24/05/2009 - 16:19
okay first of all the spirit level indicator is only an indicator so far as they could tell (at least with that demo model it was) it didn't straighten your photo automatically (most likely).
Okay I can't talk much about the software since that wasn't working and wasn't even finished so going to talk about how the camera is in your hands.
The camera had the DA*50-135 on it and the viewfinder was good not noticeable much better then that from the K10D but what I liked was that the information bar was better readable for me as a four eye (spectacles).
The K-7 doesn't appear to be a lot smaller and also isn't that in your hands and also the weight is the same. You do feel that the camera isn't that heigh because my pinky had more room to move but the grip was a bit better then the K10D and the controlls were all good rachable and I didn't miss the buttons and the grip on the left side.
The two buttons on the camera (iso & EV balance) are good reachable and not a problem at all. The AF button was for some a concern and also for me but since all the other buttons are quite flushed the AF button appears quite thick but when the camera is in your hands it wasn't a probelm at all. The AF button is almost in the same place as on the K10D so didn't need to search for that one and was good usable and I don't expect it to be a problem for anyone.
The top of the grip were the scroll wheel is does apear to be long certainly when you have it in your hands but still the scroll wheel is no problem to reach.
The need of pressing the button to rotate the mode-dial was not anoying for me, you could do it with one hand so it's something to get used too.
Also the magnesium body didn't feel a lot more durable then the K10D so that says alot about the high quality plastic that they used on the K10D.
There is only one point that might be a problem in use and that's the "rubber" cover of where the HDMI connection and some others are.
It's easy to make it loose but to get the rubber back in place might be a bit of an hassle. It's probable better and cheaper solution to make a weather prove cover and you don't use that very often so I don't see it as a problem really but something that might could have be done better.
So all in all I find the K-7 better in my hands as the K10D it didn't feel smaller so for all that worried about that it really isn't something to worry about. You might think it feel a bit slimmer but not smaller and I've long fingers so once again don't worry.
Also all the controlls were good at hand, just need to see how the FN buttons and the AF selection combo works.
Anymore questions?
Comment by Anvh posted on In your hands the K-7 vs K10D at 24/05/2009 - 15:50


Pity... Hight is the only dimension I wished the k10D would gain, so I could fit my fingers better... I think I'd be worse with the K-7.
Good news about the VF though, being a 4 eyed person myself, it isn't easy to use it very.
I also like the fact that the BG is fatter, grest improvement (plus the AA use).
I don't believe the grip would be bigger then the bg-2 grip it's of course shorter so it might look more bulky.
Thanks for posting this - the new small size was the one thing I was concerned about.
To be honest when you look at the camera it doesn't look a lot smaller and it doesn't feel small but if you set it beside the K20D you see the difference though. I didn't had it beside the K-M but it looked almost to be the same size.
So the K-M and then with the K20D grip, weight and quality that's how I would describe it.