All Forum Comments
Comment by Anvh posted on FA v D-FA 100mm 1:2.8 Macro at 24/03/2010 - 14:17
Title: WOFF heap corruption due to integer overflow
Impact: Critical
Announced: March 22, 2010
Reporter: Evgeny Legerov
Products: Firefox 3.6
Fixed in: Firefox 3.6.2
Description
Security researcher Evgeny Legerov of Intevydis reported that the WOFF decoder contains an integer overflow in a font decompression routine. This flaw could result in too small a memory buffer being allocated to store a downloadable font. An attacker could use this vulnerability to crash a victim's browser and execute arbitrary code on his/her system.
Support for the WOFF downloadable font format is new in Firefox 3.6 (Gecko 1.9.2); this vulnerability does not affect products built on earlier versions of the Mozilla browser engine.
Comment by Anvh posted on Important Firefox update at 24/03/2010 - 00:01
The best might be a Tamron 70-300, DA 50-200 but above your price.
I think you should look for a prime, there are quite a lot of 135mm lenses I believe and they are sharp, fast and around the price you want.
Comment by Anvh posted on Sharpest, cheapest and fastest long zoom? at 23/03/2010 - 23:40
Comment by Anvh posted on Another pointless thread at 23/03/2010 - 23:30
When wheat flour began to come into common use for making cakes and puddings, cooks in the north of England devised a means of making use of the fat that dropped into the dripping pan to cook a batter pudding while the meat roasted. In 1737 a recipe for 'A dripping pudding' was published in "The Whole Duty of a Woman":
Make a good batter as for pancakes; put in a hot toss-pan over the fire with a bit of butter to fry the bottom a little then put the pan and butter under a shoulder of mutton, instead of a dripping pan, keeping frequently shaking it by the handle and it will be light and savoury, and fit to take up when your mutton is enough; then turn it in a dish and serve it hot.
Similar instructions were published in 1747 in ‘The Art of Cookery Made Plain and Simple’ by Hannah Glasse under the title of 'Yorkshire pudding'. It was she who re-invented and re-named the original version, called Dripping Pudding, which had been cooked in England for centuries, although these puddings were much flatter than the puffy versions known today.
Comment by Anvh posted on Another pointless thread at 23/03/2010 - 23:23
now the cat needs feeding.
Comment by Anvh posted on Another pointless thread at 23/03/2010 - 22:51
Here is the digital manual http://www.pentaximaging.com/images/temp/63391640861465894351294K100D_Super_e_we...
go to page 190 to get page 188 of the manual.
Comment by Anvh posted on K100D-Super Manual lens compatibility at 23/03/2010 - 22:04
As for the thought of FF having a security issue, I have to chuckle. As we all know, it's perfect and it's only IE that has security issues - we have been told that so many times it must be true - must it not? Of course not. The simple truth is that every hacker and his dog have a go at Microsoft stuff, and virtually no-one bothers with the others. As a result, IE is actually a great deal more secure than most others and if anyone had a decent go at the opposition, they would find it quite easy.
Comment by Anvh posted on Important Firefox update at 23/03/2010 - 21:36
At least that's how I do it and I ain't no expert
Comment by Anvh posted on flash gels at 23/03/2010 - 21:34
Not being into flash photography (yet) could someone explain to me why you would use gels rather than changing the colour temperature in your raw converter?
The problem is that if you're indoors under tungsten lighting (orange) and your flash is daylight (blue) then you've a problem because you've two different colours of light and you can't change the colour temperature of just one light in PP.
Now there are also creative options to think of.
Here, look at this http://lightingmods.blogspot.com/2007/12/flash-gels-for-correcting-color.html
Yep they are, got my copy on saturday morning with 3 gels, red orange and blue
Comment by Anvh posted on flash gels at 23/03/2010 - 20:57



FA
DFA
I believe John have said that both are the same as well but I could be mistaken.
The DFA indeed feels a bit flimsy that's why I took interests in the DFA WR lately, you pay a bit extra but you get the quality of the limited lenses for that, you do lose the aperture ring though.