All Forum Comments
Comment by Anvh posted on DA*16-50 vs Sigma 17-50 at 30/05/2010 - 14:13
Oggy wrote:
Curious.
All my cards except one are Sandisk ExtremeIIIs. They are labelled Class 6 33Mb/s. If I look at their site They no longer show my cards but show ExtremeIIIs Class 6 20Mb/s and the Class 10 33Mb/s.
Methinks someone has been swapping the labels.
I'd still recommend them though.
From what I know the Class 10 isn't offical yet, maybe they are now and don't want to fall behind with the rest.Curious.
All my cards except one are Sandisk ExtremeIIIs. They are labelled Class 6 33Mb/s. If I look at their site They no longer show my cards but show ExtremeIIIs Class 6 20Mb/s and the Class 10 33Mb/s.
Methinks someone has been swapping the labels.
I'd still recommend them though.
Even the Extreme III class 6 20mb/s can be rated class 10
Comment by Anvh posted on Which memory card? at 30/05/2010 - 14:08
Thank you all I'll give them a try
Seems pixelmator is out of the picture then
I believe it was you who said that Adobe Photoshop didn't run so good on it so looking for alternative...
I don't know if Apple has something against installing a differnt OS an the Ipad, it should be able to run certain Linux versions.
We are however going very off topic here again.
Seems pixelmator is out of the picture then
thoughton wrote:
I said in the Adobe vs Apple topic that with the study I'm wanting to follow I'll be getting a macbook.Anvh wrote:
I've a special question for Mac users, have you ever tried pixelmator?
I have, but why do you care? Are you going to get a Mac now?I've a special question for Mac users, have you ever tried pixelmator?
I believe it was you who said that Adobe Photoshop didn't run so good on it so looking for alternative...
thoughton wrote:
There is a problem with how Apple (and others) provides the user agreament according to the Dutch (dont know about EU or UK) law they must be provided before you purchase the product so the user agreement you get during installation is therefore invallid. So you can for example install Mac onto a normall PC for the time being.techno-terminator wrote:
Tim
IIRC on a thread a while back - possibly re the iPad [ certainly it was a Mac v Windows thing ] Stefan said he was thinking of doing a 'Hackintosh ' system .
That is ethically and morally wrong, and probably illegal (although this has yet to be verified by an EU court). I'm sure Stefan wouldn't stoop to such vile deeds, especially given his righteous attitude to Apple's monopolistic practices. Tim
IIRC on a thread a while back - possibly re the iPad [ certainly it was a Mac v Windows thing ] Stefan said he was thinking of doing a 'Hackintosh ' system .
I don't know if Apple has something against installing a differnt OS an the Ipad, it should be able to run certain Linux versions.
We are however going very off topic here again.
Comment by Anvh posted on Photoshop alternatives at 30/05/2010 - 14:04
Sorry Tim but I read about it in 2007 from that Dutch website I linked you through, almost all of the links come from there. I wasn't so interested in it so no I didn't read more about it besides what I provided you. You as Apple user will certainly know more.
At the computerworld link it's suggest that that aplication wasn't the fault and th BOSD even happen when it wasn't installed. Of course it's all hear say.
Hehe from what I hear you say it seems you've tried out the software or not
It goes with the same line as register-cleaners and that sort of stuff you see for windows by the looks of it.
At the computerworld link it's suggest that that aplication wasn't the fault and th BOSD even happen when it wasn't installed. Of course it's all hear say.
Hehe from what I hear you say it seems you've tried out the software or not
It goes with the same line as register-cleaners and that sort of stuff you see for windows by the looks of it.
Comment by Anvh posted on Freedom of choice at 30/05/2010 - 13:49
johnriley wrote:
You can label it light sensative and it should be alright, you can ask UPS what they then do, probably they will do an hand inspection then.Quote:
So is air freight/post not scanned?
I would be very surprised if it wasn't, and with high power machines as well.So is air freight/post not scanned?
Comment by Anvh posted on X Rays at Airports at 30/05/2010 - 13:30
For any moderators, I'm going away for a long weekend Tim probably wants to reply and I would like him to have the opportunity to do that but be happy to close it afterwards since the usefulness (if there was any) is gone.
I was hoping to talk about what Measures Apple and Adobe might take to get their "right" and if we should worry about Adobes future on the Mac but that discussing never happened.
I was hoping to talk about what Measures Apple and Adobe might take to get their "right" and if we should worry about Adobes future on the Mac but that discussing never happened.
Comment by Anvh posted on Freedom of choice at 28/05/2010 - 08:32
chaude wrote:
a split screen might, but i don't get how it actually works, do i only get to see the middle circle bit, and the rest would be hazy/blurry?!?!
too new to this world so i know nothing, apart from my eyes feeling tired and strained after using a camera =P
This should be helpful, scroll down a bit. linka split screen might, but i don't get how it actually works, do i only get to see the middle circle bit, and the rest would be hazy/blurry?!?!
too new to this world so i know nothing, apart from my eyes feeling tired and strained after using a camera =P
The Katzeye screens are Nikon K3 screens.
Comment by Anvh posted on wearing glasses and shooting... at 28/05/2010 - 07:49
thoughton wrote:
Huh?Anvh wrote:
That's what I meant Tim, no program is without a bug and no program is perfect.
That may be what you meant, but it isn't what you said.That's what I meant Tim, no program is without a bug and no program is perfect.
Anvh wrote:
you're right but no program is without bugs sadly
Leopard wasn't a success story either
you're right but no program is without bugs sadly
Leopard wasn't a success story either
Quote:
Yeah same here, blue screen bug?Anvh wrote:
The blue screen problem of Leopard was sadly one of the biggest problems for Apple in recent years and therefore a good example.
Blue screen bug? Are you serious? Have you just suddenly learnt about this on Google? That problem hardly made a ripple after the Leopard launch! It was a tiny minority of users who had installed a system level hack suffered it. Not only was it a hack, it had a terrible reputation for causing crashes all the time. These people install something that patches their system software in an unapproved manner, and the system upgrade breaks. Is that really so surprising? (And Stefan, please please please tell me you already knew all of this before making your Leopard pronouncement.)The blue screen problem of Leopard was sadly one of the biggest problems for Apple in recent years and therefore a good example.
An Application Enhancer seemed to be the bad guy bad strangely enough that bad guy say it can not be their fault link
Also please stop with that google thing since non of the information I used came from google they all came from this site and here is your Apple BSOD link
You are talking about a hacker that caused the Blue screen on Apple and i couldn't found it on mine sites and since you're so against google I ain't going to use it too look it up since you would probably give some comment I can't used it probably so you give me the article that said that it was a hack that caused it.
Quote:
I believe you may have misunderstood Doug's post.
Than please tell me what he meant since English isn't my native language after all. Anvh wrote:
Btw why can Doug say that Windows is buggy as hell and when I say that no program is sadly without bugs and that leopard wasn't such a success story, I'm suddenly saying something completely ignorant and inflammatory?
Btw why can Doug say that Windows is buggy as hell and when I say that no program is sadly without bugs and that leopard wasn't such a success story, I'm suddenly saying something completely ignorant and inflammatory?
I believe you may have misunderstood Doug's post.
Quote:
It seems you've a problem with your memory and/or with reading, since it looks like it's quite selective. Now don't say it isn't since you could only read one sentence of a two sentence comment of mine Anvh wrote:
That you take it so wrongly isn't my fault
If you make these wildly inaccurate statements you're going to get reactions. Sorry, but that's just how it is. That you take it so wrongly isn't my fault
Comment by Anvh posted on Freedom of choice at 28/05/2010 - 07:40
I also wear glasses but I don't know if there is a special way to help you against that so I'm also interested to hear tips and suggestions.
Do you think that a focusing aid might help?
One is a split-screen, you can get them for cheap off ebay or from Focusingscreen.com or Katzeye.com
Another option might be a magnify ocular but I aint sure if that's so wise with glasses.
Do you think that a focusing aid might help?
One is a split-screen, you can get them for cheap off ebay or from Focusingscreen.com or Katzeye.com
Another option might be a magnify ocular but I aint sure if that's so wise with glasses.
Comment by Anvh posted on wearing glasses and shooting... at 28/05/2010 - 00:13
Talking about cars couldn't you fit a Porsche engine inside a VW Beetle?
ps. is there one topic here that didn't went off topic?
ps. is there one topic here that didn't went off topic?
Comment by Anvh posted on gx-20 .....how good ? as good as k20? at 28/05/2010 - 00:05
Was a slightly bit worried that during zooming the lens might suck up some water or get in in through the barrel but it seems okay.
Btw didn't thought I would love the 16mm end so much but 90% of the photos are made there
For me the only strange thing with 16-50 was that it extended towards the short end (where I used most).
at 16mm it's the smallest and at 50mm it's extended.