Yes you're right about that, it's also just a small part of the total study but I'm happy to see they are experimenting with the potential of it.
Wouldn't you smack yourself on the head if it's getting normal in the industry over 3 years to also film with your DSLR and that you know nothing about it when you graduate

Also with the amount of smartphones on the market, e-paper and the iPad things might change, instead of a photos you can have a 5 second video for example, DSLR would be perfect to produce such short clips I think but who knows what the future might bring.

Which photoshop do you've?

Do you think Pentax would sell enough 135 format cameras to clear the cost?
Even Sony is struggling in the 135 format market

What Pentax will do with the 645D is different because lets face it, the model hasn't changed much from the prototype 5 years or so ago and the hardware is almost precisely the same as the K7 so they wouldn't have had much development cost with the 645D.
It also seems they have looked at the users that still use the Pentax 645 today and that's why it's aimed at landscape photography primarily and they are offering different then others.

I think Pentax has more potential at making the 645D an success story then a 135 format.
To be honest I'm actually hoping pentax would make a camera that could compete against the Canon 7D, that model seems to work out very well for Canon.

Yes that's right, one reason they asked someone who had experience with video to judge the work.

But I also believe that video with a DSLR is very different then with a videocamera.
It's interesting to see how the new medium will involve in... maybe close to something like a moving photo?

And telescopes

Yes you're right about that but I think it would be great if the forum would accept the actual player on the site or use a player on them own.

Here this the spectrum of a "white" led
450 is blue
500 is green
600 is red (roughly)

Algi I don't question that, I only said they weren't for me.

The modifiers I use eat a stop of light so the AF200 would be an effective 10GN flash so I would need two of those mounted side by side to get more power but the YN460-II is then just as powerful and cheaper so it simply isn't interesting.

For macro the AF200 is surely enough but not for strobist work

Any progress on this?

It's been said quite some many times now that it's not fully a photography forum but a Pentax forum. Pentax now has video so it's only logical to have a video section right.

I know it's on old topic but I went to an open day of a photography school which i'm applying to for a full study and we are getting a minor in video.
Someone even did his end exam by present a video instead of a photo, it seems times are changing.
Good, bad... I don't know but now that it's here it isn't going away so lets try to master it.

Has any one have some good movies?

Don't need any flashgun as a trigger because I've the cactus v4.

If I would use the AF200T or AF240T I would need at least two to get the power output that I want, I also want zoom on my flash.

The AF400T is a hammer flash and wouldn't fit on my flash stands I think