All Forum Comments
Comment by Anvh posted on questions 300mm lens at 16/06/2010 - 17:57
Mike this one is from photozone and f/22 doesn't look promising,
at f/16 you get almost triple the amount off sharpness.
If you want everything in focus you need to use a technique called focus stacking.
Never done it but Google is your friend here.
at f/16 you get almost triple the amount off sharpness.
If you want everything in focus you need to use a technique called focus stacking.
Never done it but Google is your friend here.
Comment by Anvh posted on Sharp Egg? at 16/06/2010 - 17:43
And then the shutter goes off and gone are the birds
I think you should get yourself a K7 as well
I think you should get yourself a K7 as well
Comment by Anvh posted on questions 300mm lens at 16/06/2010 - 17:34
He already has a Canon T1i so it's probably just a flame post.
Comment by Anvh posted on Pentax K-x: Slow focus! at 16/06/2010 - 16:21
robbie_d wrote:
I mean everything is draw with the hand, no fancy computer vectors and things like that.Anvh wrote:
For the ones that are a bit bored, he is a nice stunning looking game, it's all handmade. The first 10% is free.
machinarium.net
:For the ones that are a bit bored, he is a nice stunning looking game, it's all handmade. The first 10% is free.
machinarium.net
Comment by Anvh posted on Another pointless thread at 16/06/2010 - 16:17
Thank you Sonya, That's an interesting read.
Comment by Anvh posted on Zoo Photography at 16/06/2010 - 16:15
Here is another read. http://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutorials/RAW-file-format.htm
I shoot RAW because I like to process my photos and RAW give me the most capabilities to do that without loosing details. It just depends on what type of shooter you're.
I would only suggest RAW if you're willing to put time and effort in your photo at home.
I shoot RAW because I like to process my photos and RAW give me the most capabilities to do that without loosing details. It just depends on what type of shooter you're.
I would only suggest RAW if you're willing to put time and effort in your photo at home.
Comment by Anvh posted on J.Peg or Raw at 16/06/2010 - 16:11
Yes simple white or black border of a few pixels just to make the photo loose from the background colour of the site can be very useful.
Comment by Anvh posted on frames round images at 16/06/2010 - 16:02
petrochemist wrote:
I think it all depends on how you plan to use you monopod.
I've read many comments on the web saying a ball head is a disadvantage on a monopod as you can rotate or tilt the 'pod - these generally recommend a simple unidirectional tilt head.
Like you said it's just how you use the monopod.I think it all depends on how you plan to use you monopod.
I've read many comments on the web saying a ball head is a disadvantage on a monopod as you can rotate or tilt the 'pod - these generally recommend a simple unidirectional tilt head.
For aircrafts you're looking up and for that it would be very handy, because it would else be very difficult to position the monopod stable.
If you just search for how to use a monopod you will find almost all suggest using a ballhead to get optimal stability, it's on the forums many say you don't need one.
Comment by Anvh posted on Ball head for monopod at 16/06/2010 - 15:56
MrCynical wrote:
A DA*30, if it were ever to exist, would have to be priced similarly to the FA31 to avoid stomping all over it. Hence even if Pentax do make it, it'll likely be far out of my league
Don't think so, the DA*55 is already sharper at least and what the rumours says it would use the same optic design, so I think it would cost roughly the same as the DA*55 if that's anything to go on.A DA*30, if it were ever to exist, would have to be priced similarly to the FA31 to avoid stomping all over it. Hence even if Pentax do make it, it'll likely be far out of my league
Comment by Anvh posted on Lens dilemma at 16/06/2010 - 15:33
Could we maybe see some photos, probably the experts here can give you some tips to improve?