All Forum Comments
That's very hard to do I think, not adjusting the sharpening but to get two different camera to sharpen at the same level and there are also other adjustments like colour and contrast going on.
Comment by Anvh posted on 18-55 versions at 19/08/2010 - 17:48
Since it's a long exposure the second that it might wobble a bit doesn't effect the image so much, surely if you don't use a long focal length so mirror lock up isn't essential.
Comment by Anvh posted on night pictures at 19/08/2010 - 17:02
Wadna is right though but it depends on how you look at it.
If you compare pixel for pixel then surely the *istD have pixels off higher quality but since the K7 has more then double the amount of pixel the total sensor is better on some points.
It's still CCD vs CMOS and they both have their own strengths.
If you compare pixel for pixel then surely the *istD have pixels off higher quality but since the K7 has more then double the amount of pixel the total sensor is better on some points.
It's still CCD vs CMOS and they both have their own strengths.
Comment by Anvh posted on Most wanted feature? at 19/08/2010 - 16:59
yes you're right but I don't think it's a useful to buy the first version of the lens though. The newer version have upgraded and better optic performance while the rest is the same as the DA AL II lens.
Why would you want to have 2 kit lenses to begin with?
About the Nikon being sharper, are you comparing RAW or JPG?
Pentax hardly sharpen their JPG output compared to the rest so to make a good comparison you should use RAW.
Why would you want to have 2 kit lenses to begin with?
About the Nikon being sharper, are you comparing RAW or JPG?
Pentax hardly sharpen their JPG output compared to the rest so to make a good comparison you should use RAW.
Comment by Anvh posted on 18-55 versions at 19/08/2010 - 15:59
Indeed congratulations Tony
Comment by Anvh posted on Another pointless thread at 18/08/2010 - 15:29
Graham, I've no idea what you mean.
I wouldn't start with the sixth since it doesn't seem to help you.
I wouldn't start with the sixth since it doesn't seem to help you.
TOZZA27 wrote:
Surely if we were to discuss it again it would be pointless ??
Indeed, the users that voted have said they wouldn't mind a video section so the discussion is over... just waiting for it now.Surely if we were to discuss it again it would be pointless ??
Comment by Anvh posted on Another pointless thread at 18/08/2010 - 15:28
Rowmac wrote:
Pardon my lack of knowledge but IQ?
Had a brief look at some of your landscape photos and they look very good. If I may ask, how did you balance exposure between land and sky? Every time I make an attempt at landscapes, my K-x either adjusts according to the sky and land comes out underexposed or it picks land and the sky is far too bright. Any tips?
IQ = Image QualityPardon my lack of knowledge but IQ?
Had a brief look at some of your landscape photos and they look very good. If I may ask, how did you balance exposure between land and sky? Every time I make an attempt at landscapes, my K-x either adjusts according to the sky and land comes out underexposed or it picks land and the sky is far too bright. Any tips?
For the exposure problems, that's why there are GND (graduated neutral density) filters.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graduated_neutral_density_filter
Comment by Anvh posted on Wide Angle or Fish Eyes? at 18/08/2010 - 14:31
Tony, Will already said it.
We also already had a lengthy discussing about this matter so no use to discuss it in "pointless thread"
Here it is link
Isn't that lengthy though
We also already had a lengthy discussing about this matter so no use to discuss it in "pointless thread"
Here it is link
Isn't that lengthy though
Comment by Anvh posted on Another pointless thread at 18/08/2010 - 14:28
TOZZA27 wrote:
Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo !
:::Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo !
Comment by Anvh posted on Another pointless thread at 18/08/2010 - 13:37
TOZZA27 wrote:
now people can look at their cr*p photos from the holiday in Spain and see them lifelike and realistic !
A snip at £400 - will we see a 3D comp here soon Stefan?
3D can not be called realistic though, they are already busy with interactive and tactile holograms that's something you might call realistic. now people can look at their cr*p photos from the holiday in Spain and see them lifelike and realistic !
A snip at £400 - will we see a 3D comp here soon Stefan?
About the comp, I'm still waiting for a video section on this forum
Comment by Anvh posted on Another pointless thread at 18/08/2010 - 13:31
