All Forum Comments
Comment by Anvh posted on predications Pentax 2010 at 25/10/2010 - 00:11
I believe the K-X has lens correction, if you set that on that should polish the defect away.
Comment by Anvh posted on vignetting with 18-55 AL at 24/10/2010 - 20:35
MrCynical wrote:
2. Tilt the flash head to bounce the light off the ceiling
Yeah but it's not ideal though, certainly not if you've coloured walls.Anvh wrote:
Flash would be a solution but it's not a simple thing to use effectively because if you use it just on the camera the flash would make your images look flat.
1. Buy a Stofen Omnibounce diffuserFlash would be a solution but it's not a simple thing to use effectively because if you use it just on the camera the flash would make your images look flat.
2. Tilt the flash head to bounce the light off the ceiling
Also if you tilt the flash the omni bounce becomes less effective so it's better to just bounce and that way save you a few quid and put less strain on the battery and flash.
What flash to buy... I think you should look at the new Metz 44, they seem to have make the interface easier on that flash.
Comment by Anvh posted on 17-50 f2.8 & flash to replace 50mm f1.7? at 24/10/2010 - 19:40
liberatortoo wrote:
Corel Paintshop Photo Pro x3
Serif Photoplus x4
Are they as good as Elements (or better!)?
Don't know if they are better in one way or another but they are all different.Corel Paintshop Photo Pro x3
Serif Photoplus x4
Are they as good as Elements (or better!)?
If you're use to Elements then getting use to another program might take a while.
Comment by Anvh posted on Recommend an alternative to Photoshp Elements at 24/10/2010 - 19:18
But linking or showing them is the same thing right?
You only put photos on this forum by uploading them to the gallery.
If you show a photo on the forum you need to put the link/address here.
I don't see that the code (img)(/img) make a difference in this matter.
You only put photos on this forum by uploading them to the gallery.
If you show a photo on the forum you need to put the link/address here.
I don't see that the code (img)(/img) make a difference in this matter.
Comment by Anvh posted on New Forum Ideas at 24/10/2010 - 17:06
redbusa99 wrote:
i have been told there is a discrepancy in the apeture size on some sigma lenses and what your pentax camera actually detects, its to do with the camera electronics and lens electronics not marrying up alledgedly the error is with pentax
Or with the lens...i have been told there is a discrepancy in the apeture size on some sigma lenses and what your pentax camera actually detects, its to do with the camera electronics and lens electronics not marrying up alledgedly the error is with pentax
Sigma and Tamron reverse engineer after all so the older lenses might not work like they should on newer cameras.
Comment by Anvh posted on DAL 35mm Review at 24/10/2010 - 16:15
They are now busy with electronic shutters.
Think about translucent LCD screens that can go from translucent to black in 1/1000 of a second.
Not that strange motion distortion you get with the current shutter and you've flash sync up to 1/1000
The only problem is that they eat about 1/3th to 1/4th of the light at the moment
Think about translucent LCD screens that can go from translucent to black in 1/1000 of a second.
Not that strange motion distortion you get with the current shutter and you've flash sync up to 1/1000
The only problem is that they eat about 1/3th to 1/4th of the light at the moment
Comment by Anvh posted on predications Pentax 2010 at 24/10/2010 - 16:13
But is linking to them not the same as posting?
The only way to get a photo really on this site is to upload it in the gallery here for the rests is all linking that you do.
There are no rules to prohibit showing photos from other makes here.
Only the gallery and the my photo section and competition is Pentax only
The only way to get a photo really on this site is to upload it in the gallery here for the rests is all linking that you do.
There are no rules to prohibit showing photos from other makes here.
Only the gallery and the my photo section and competition is Pentax only
Comment by Anvh posted on New Forum Ideas at 24/10/2010 - 16:09
Gwyn wrote:
Correction: I put up a thread today of fantastic photos, which happened to be taken by Nikon cameras, since it was a Nikon Competition. Nikon was a sideline to want the post was about, not the central topic.
But it was about a Nikon competition like you said and that was relevant in the discussion.Correction: I put up a thread today of fantastic photos, which happened to be taken by Nikon cameras, since it was a Nikon Competition. Nikon was a sideline to want the post was about, not the central topic.
Some say it wasn't allowed to post photos of other makes here, well you just made a thread full of them.
It's how you word things and what your intentions are.
Comment by Anvh posted on New Forum Ideas at 24/10/2010 - 15:41
I actually couldn't find anything saying you couldn't post things about other manufactures in the Terms of Use so just go ahead and talk about your rangefinders or Nikon D7000.
Comment by Anvh posted on New Forum Ideas at 24/10/2010 - 15:36
The only problem is that they eat about 1/3th to 1/4th of the light at the moment
i think you're confused with the fixed translucent mirror in the new Sony, those even cut 50% of the light and have 50% dimmer viewfinder.
I was talking about shutter not a mirror.