Anvh

Joined: 4th July 2008

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

Anvh
ISO wrote:
Could we continue in a simpler way
IGNORE my SUGGESTIONS for RULES - as I said earlier, I only included them incase some Members were worried about a free for all. (Which seems to apply to Threads anyway)
Okay then I like to re-vote want i voted no because of the rules.

So subtract one vote of no and add to yes.

Comment by Anvh posted on Vote on having a new ‘Leads to Deals’ Section at 26/10/2010 - 12:01

Anvh
Lidy I actually said the same thing you do now but not about me but about the rules to Paul (ISO) he send some of us an example before posting here.

Comment by Anvh posted on Vote on having a new ‘Leads to Deals’ Section at 26/10/2010 - 00:32

Anvh
hmm let me think...

It's based on the assumption off Gareth.
If 99% would vote yes so also then there is only 1% that vote against it.
That means that the current 29% votes against is because of something else.
And if we assume the blame is with me, like what is suggested, all i did was discuss the rules that would mean the rules are at fault. If the rules weren't there i wouldn't have discussed them or members didn't had read them and where against it.

Does that make sense?

So my word agree in the part you quoted isn't fully correct then maybe.

edit: worded things differently

Comment by Anvh posted on Vote on having a new ‘Leads to Deals’ Section at 25/10/2010 - 23:17

Anvh
Gareth i'm not trying to derail it or screw the voting up.

Because we are voting about changing something in the forum it's quite serious so i at least want that the voting is done in a fair an correct matter.

cardiff_gareth wrote:
I know what it'll be 99% of people said yes to the change but due to the bickering it's a no go.
If you think that's true then now roughly 33% don't agree with the rules ISO (Paul) said would be applied for this Leads to Deals Section.

If you want that the vote is about having a Leads to Deals Section only, then you need to start another one.

Comment by Anvh posted on Vote on having a new ‘Leads to Deals’ Section at 25/10/2010 - 23:03

Anvh
jacqui2 wrote:
Hi mike, any idea what they are like? that would be a good solution longer zoom, and wide angle, thanks.
I had the Pentax.
It's a good quality lens but a bit soft on the long end and slow to focus.
Later sold it to get a DA*50-135 because i hardly used the DA18-250 in any other range so i thought it might be better to get a better quality lens for that range then and f/2.8 opens opportunities.

why not keep the 18-125 and get a Sigma 120-400 or something like that?

Comment by Anvh posted on 55-300mm at 25/10/2010 - 22:39

Anvh
Yeah but not f/2.8 though.
The Sigma 50-150mm or the Pentax 50-135 are your only option or you can get 70-200 f/2.8 lens.

if f/2.8 is not needed.
Pentax DA55-300 is the better budget zoom lens, SRS has a good deal now for them.

Comment by Anvh posted on What comes after the 17-50 f2.8? at 25/10/2010 - 22:33

Anvh
But the difference between PSE 8 and 9 isn't that great right, there are only some new tools and options but fundamentally it's the same or not?
So maybe you can use books for PSE 8 as well.

Comment by Anvh posted on PSE9 at 25/10/2010 - 22:23

Anvh
I would love to shut up but there is a new problem now.

Because you meant something different then you said in your first comment and what we are voting on.
You need to decide if you want to continue with your original message because if you want to change it to what you actually meant we need to re-vote or else it wouldn't be fair *sighs*

ps. if this voting continues and the majority vote yes then there is the problem on how to deliver those rules... i hope you've an idea.

Comment by Anvh posted on Vote on having a new ‘Leads to Deals’ Section at 25/10/2010 - 22:20

Anvh
You're wording it differently.
In your first comment you said there would be some rules/safeguards and now you're saying they might/could be put in place.

I ain't the only one who commented on that, i was the only one who wanted to discuss the rules though and how you wanted to implement them/carry them out.

johnriley wrote:
The second point is that you've added rules that have not been agreed.

Comment by Anvh posted on Vote on having a new ‘Leads to Deals’ Section at 25/10/2010 - 21:48

Anvh
release candidates off Adobe Camera Raw 6.3 and Lightroom 3.3 are out.

Sadly it doesn't look that good... no support for the Pentax K-r or K-5 yet
link

Comment by Anvh posted on RC ACR 6.3 & LR 3.3 at 25/10/2010 - 21:39

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo