All Forum Comments
Comment by Anvh posted on Vote on having a new ‘Leads to Deals’ Section at 26/10/2010 - 12:01
Comment by Anvh posted on Vote on having a new ‘Leads to Deals’ Section at 26/10/2010 - 00:32
It's based on the assumption off Gareth.
If 99% would vote yes so also then there is only 1% that vote against it.
That means that the current 29% votes against is because of something else.
And if we assume the blame is with me, like what is suggested, all i did was discuss the rules that would mean the rules are at fault. If the rules weren't there i wouldn't have discussed them or members didn't had read them and where against it.
Does that make sense?
So my word agree in the part you quoted isn't fully correct then maybe.
edit: worded things differently
Comment by Anvh posted on Vote on having a new ‘Leads to Deals’ Section at 25/10/2010 - 23:17
Because we are voting about changing something in the forum it's quite serious so i at least want that the voting is done in a fair an correct matter.
I know what it'll be 99% of people said yes to the change but due to the bickering it's a no go.
If you want that the vote is about having a Leads to Deals Section only, then you need to start another one.
Comment by Anvh posted on Vote on having a new ‘Leads to Deals’ Section at 25/10/2010 - 23:03
Hi mike, any idea what they are like? that would be a good solution longer zoom, and wide angle, thanks.
It's a good quality lens but a bit soft on the long end and slow to focus.
Later sold it to get a DA*50-135 because i hardly used the DA18-250 in any other range so i thought it might be better to get a better quality lens for that range then and f/2.8 opens opportunities.
why not keep the 18-125 and get a Sigma 120-400 or something like that?
The Sigma 50-150mm or the Pentax 50-135 are your only option or you can get 70-200 f/2.8 lens.
if f/2.8 is not needed.
Pentax DA55-300 is the better budget zoom lens, SRS has a good deal now for them.
Comment by Anvh posted on What comes after the 17-50 f2.8? at 25/10/2010 - 22:33
Because you meant something different then you said in your first comment and what we are voting on.
You need to decide if you want to continue with your original message because if you want to change it to what you actually meant we need to re-vote or else it wouldn't be fair *sighs*
ps. if this voting continues and the majority vote yes then there is the problem on how to deliver those rules... i hope you've an idea.
Comment by Anvh posted on Vote on having a new ‘Leads to Deals’ Section at 25/10/2010 - 22:20
In your first comment you said there would be some rules/safeguards and now you're saying they might/could be put in place.
I ain't the only one who commented on that, i was the only one who wanted to discuss the rules though and how you wanted to implement them/carry them out.
The second point is that you've added rules that have not been agreed.
Comment by Anvh posted on Vote on having a new ‘Leads to Deals’ Section at 25/10/2010 - 21:48
Sadly it doesn't look that good... no support for the Pentax K-r or K-5 yet
link
Comment by Anvh posted on RC ACR 6.3 & LR 3.3 at 25/10/2010 - 21:39


Could we continue in a simpler way
IGNORE my SUGGESTIONS for RULES - as I said earlier, I only included them incase some Members were worried about a free for all. (Which seems to apply to Threads anyway)
So subtract one vote of no and add to yes.