All Forum Comments
They also have an SF7 for £100
Comment by Algernon posted on grrrrrr eBay numpties at 09/08/2011 - 09:55
A Dallmeyer Super-Six Anastigmat 3-1/4'' F/1.9 Lens sold yesterday
for £8,100 started at 99p. I wonder if the seller was expecting that
It did include the Original BOX which probably added about £2k
link
Some sample shots:
link
for £8,100 started at 99p. I wonder if the seller was expecting that
It did include the Original BOX which probably added about £2k
link
Some sample shots:
link
Comment by Algernon posted on Dallmeyer Super-Six Anastigmat 83mm Sold for £8k on Ebay at 09/08/2011 - 09:05
Frogherder wrote:
Does anyone remember copying files in Windows95/98 where the option to ignore files already copied could be used.
I'm wanting to use this facility in XP as I'm fed up with waiting ages whilst I copy whole folders again and again just to ensure I didn't miss anything.
Is there an add on to XP or a 3rd party freeware solution?
regards
Bernard
Windows never had that even though earlier computers did. You used to be able to answer N each time it asked or just keep the N Key pressed down until the copying finished. You can still get Winfile free.Does anyone remember copying files in Windows95/98 where the option to ignore files already copied could be used.
I'm wanting to use this facility in XP as I'm fed up with waiting ages whilst I copy whole folders again and again just to ensure I didn't miss anything.
Is there an add on to XP or a 3rd party freeware solution?
regards
Bernard
NT4 Winfile will work to a certain extent with XP You need the install from here: http://www.mdgx.com/files/FMNT32.EXE
Streets ahead of XP Explorer even though bits of it don't work.
Just run it to install. You also need the FMStepup FREE extension which
may already be in the installer. Details here link
The main info page is here, but you can ignore most of it:
http://www.mdgx.com/files/fmnt32.php
-
Comment by Algernon posted on Another pointless thread at 08/08/2011 - 14:33
Don wrote:
I mean, don't get me wrong, there is nothing wrong with that but..
take football...not euro football, which we call soccer, I mean American or Canadian football...that you play using your hands....
Considering they are wearing padding in American Football the hits look very soft greynolds999 wrote:
Actually, when it comes to Rubgy I'm an Ireland fan first.
I did manage to fit the odd pint in!
Is it just me, or is Rugby a very feminine sport?Actually, when it comes to Rubgy I'm an Ireland fan first.
I did manage to fit the odd pint in!
I mean, don't get me wrong, there is nothing wrong with that but..
take football...not euro football, which we call soccer, I mean American or Canadian football...that you play using your hands....
This shows both
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tzp-H5vfjsU
Possibly it's because if someone is wearing padding it's a lot harder to hurt them?.... so why bother
Comment by Algernon posted on Another pointless thread at 08/08/2011 - 11:04
I should be able to fix it to my Koni-Omega.... It's
got 3 flash shoes.... frames within the finder and a
sports finder link
OR... How about a viewfinder like this: link
got 3 flash shoes.... frames within the finder and a
sports finder link
OR... How about a viewfinder like this: link
Comment by Algernon posted on The Pentax Q is Imminent at 07/08/2011 - 13:33
davidstorm wrote:
The listing for the 28mm f3.5 was not anything like as described by Algi, in fact it was probably too far the other way (understated). I get the impression (may be wrong) that it was being sold by an older gentleman who was not well versed in the ways of ebay!
Someone off this forum then Ha! Ha! The listing for the 28mm f3.5 was not anything like as described by Algi, in fact it was probably too far the other way (understated). I get the impression (may be wrong) that it was being sold by an older gentleman who was not well versed in the ways of ebay!
Comment by Algernon posted on Pentax-M 28mm f3.5 SMC at 07/08/2011 - 13:05
The Pentax viewfinder is only OPTICAL
Cheaper to buy a small camera with an optical viewfinder
and mount the two on one bracket..... or buy a Russian or
Leica turret finder
I've got a Linhof 5x4 finder that might work
Cheaper to buy a small camera with an optical viewfinder
and mount the two on one bracket..... or buy a Russian or
Leica turret finder
I've got a Linhof 5x4 finder that might work
Comment by Algernon posted on The Pentax Q is Imminent at 07/08/2011 - 13:01
Just reminded me I've not tried the 55-300mm on a K-5 yet
Must try it when we next get a decent bit of weather
Must try it when we next get a decent bit of weather
Comment by Algernon posted on Some pics taken with the Pentax-DA SMC 55-300mm f/4-5.8 ED at 07/08/2011 - 11:01
Superb set and shows that the 150-500mm is well up to the job.
Comment by Algernon posted on Kingfisher at 07/08/2011 - 10:52
I love all this mythical nonsense/lenspeak that togs manage to
somehow dream up
f/3.5 can't be much use because (unlike an f/2.8 )
it hasn't got an...
EXTRA LARGE FRONT DIAMETER LENS ELEMENT FOR
BETTER PERIPHERY LIGHT GATHERING IN THE CORNERS
(VERY SIMILAR TO THE HELIOS VERSION
CAPABLE OF HIGH RESOLUTION IMAGES
and that's from a reliable source an ebay
listing from a professional photographic lens retailer
link
Just ignore the fact that it has Prinzflex written on it
Also did you know that the Pentax_M 135mm f/3.5 is
EXELLENT BOKEH FOR PORTRAITS
135mm lens is in EXELLENT condition.
VERY HIGH OPTICAL PERFORMANCE
EXEEDING THE 2.8 & 2.5 VERSIONS BY A SUBSTANTIAL MARGIN
F=3.5 f=135mm auto telephoto lens
GOOD AT EVEN FULL APERTURE (GOOD FOR DIGITAL VIDEO)
link
Not sure what "Exellent" means but because it's an f/3.5
it must be better than the f/2.8 and f/2.5 versions
people say so
Not sure either what "Exeeding" means either must be some
kind of 'Lens Expert Tradespeak' like molished by Tomioka
David, was the 28mm you bought for £28 badly listed
for it to go for about what it's worth?
somehow dream up
f/3.5 can't be much use because (unlike an f/2.8 )
it hasn't got an...
EXTRA LARGE FRONT DIAMETER LENS ELEMENT FOR
BETTER PERIPHERY LIGHT GATHERING IN THE CORNERS
(VERY SIMILAR TO THE HELIOS VERSION
CAPABLE OF HIGH RESOLUTION IMAGES
and that's from a reliable source an ebay
listing from a professional photographic lens retailer
link
Just ignore the fact that it has Prinzflex written on it
Also did you know that the Pentax_M 135mm f/3.5 is
EXELLENT BOKEH FOR PORTRAITS
135mm lens is in EXELLENT condition.
VERY HIGH OPTICAL PERFORMANCE
EXEEDING THE 2.8 & 2.5 VERSIONS BY A SUBSTANTIAL MARGIN
F=3.5 f=135mm auto telephoto lens
GOOD AT EVEN FULL APERTURE (GOOD FOR DIGITAL VIDEO)
link
Not sure what "Exellent" means but because it's an f/3.5
it must be better than the f/2.8 and f/2.5 versions
people say so
Not sure either what "Exeeding" means either must be some
kind of 'Lens Expert Tradespeak' like molished by Tomioka
David, was the 28mm you bought for £28 badly listed
for it to go for about what it's worth?
Comment by Algernon posted on Pentax-M 28mm f3.5 SMC at 07/08/2011 - 10:32
