All Forum Comments
Comment by Algernon posted on Emperor Dragonfly at 11/08/2012 - 07:29
mount it's the same as a T mount.
The T in T Mount is supposed to refer to Tamron... so there
should be no problems with their lenses.... see...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T-mount
http://www.samyang.co.uk/samyang-t2-mount.html
An M42 T Mount will fit onto a plain K extension tube (no
aperture lever or cut it off) to make an M42 to K Lens
adapter for macro work. It's secured by the 3 grub screws
these don't seem to be available commercially.
Comment by Algernon posted on Tamron BBAR and Tamron Adaptall mounts at 10/08/2012 - 18:49
In that case you original shot is probably about what I was
aiming for
I originally did a Prt Scr and pasted it into Corel Photo Paint to
see what the lowest black was and it was around 30 RGB so I saved
a copy cropped it and held the whites and mid-tones and moved the
black down then adjusted the Brightness/Contrast/Intensity.
Only took about 30 secs so I may as well post it for you
to see even though the original should be better.
Extra black added

-
Brightness/Contrast/Intensity adjusted

-
Comment by Algernon posted on What's in my bag (Fashion Photographer) at 10/08/2012 - 18:29
by the 3 grubscrews and there are loads of these with a
KM fitting on ebay.
example_ebay
You should be able to get one off ebay from the UK and
for about £6..... Jessops did one which often comes up.
Don't buy a SH one the grubscrews are often damaged.
Comment by Algernon posted on Tamron BBAR and Tamron Adaptall mounts at 10/08/2012 - 14:26
or was it just screwed on (42mm x 0.75mm thread), I've
only ever used T2 so I'm not sure of the fixing
In which case a T2 Mount should work they are backwards
compatible. Make sure you get the Pentax K one.
Comment by Algernon posted on Tamron BBAR and Tamron Adaptall mounts at 10/08/2012 - 13:49
Comment by Algernon posted on Swans on the Cam at 10/08/2012 - 11:46
It can be darkened quite easily to match the LHS shot. Something
that couldn't be done with film shots.
If you want me to post it here just let me know?
Comment by Algernon posted on What's in my bag (Fashion Photographer) at 10/08/2012 - 09:50
You want to be careful though with B&W's... anyone coming from the
film era will find any pictures not containing 'maximum black'
totally unacceptable and immediately reject them
(See 2nd shot of Elizabeth Tate. Contrast is also low).
Very dark black used to be the most desirable part of B&W
photography, you normally had to rate the film at half of the
ISO the manufacturer suggested to achieve it. The prints had
to be on Glossy Paper because that had the highest 'maximum black'
Most of the other shots do have the black correct
Comment by Algernon posted on What's in my bag (Fashion Photographer) at 10/08/2012 - 07:57
the lens FL straight through.... so basically your stuck with
that... It seems to work though.
With a basic TC you can enter the FL so you can allow for the TC.
Comment by Algernon posted on Beware - SR induced shake - Oops! at 09/08/2012 - 17:29
Or that Pentax could afford to make one!
Priced at between £2500 & £5000, how many are they going to sell.
Cheers
Dave
Comment by Algernon posted on Look what SRS have in stock at 09/08/2012 - 14:27

