Algernon

Joined: 22nd May 2010

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

Algernon
I would say white border.

With traditional wedding (film) albums all the prints
had to be the same size, because that's how it was priced
8"x6" or 8"x10" but you wouldn't have facing pages partly
because of the tissue interleaf.

I would still go for all prints the same size portrait and
landscape. I don't know if you sell reprints, but showing
small portrait sized pics isn't going to help with
selling bigger reprints. They will just order the same size
that's in the album.

Comment by Algernon posted on Quick opinion wanted about wedding album at 17/08/2012 - 16:39

Algernon
It only works at about 0.5" to 1.5"
Should work with spectacles as well

-

Comment by Algernon posted on How many K-01 owners here? at 17/08/2012 - 16:29

Algernon
Just had a quick look on the K-5 with the Pentax-F 24-50mm
zoom and the left-right 6x6 frames cover about 37mm. So
35mm should be OK.

The upper-lower lines also have parallax lines so the
upper parallax line is probably about right. There's
also a very prominent centre dot.

There was also a 35mm version marked for 50mm lens
and a 6x9

You use it with your eye about an inch away. Works
well in normal roomlight as well as sunlight.

Comment by Algernon posted on How many K-01 owners here? at 17/08/2012 - 15:49

Algernon
One of the best ideas for a viewfinder never caught on

It was the Voigtlander Kontur Finder seen and described here:
http://www.eyescoffee.com/collectcamera/voigtlanderbessar2/index.php

I have the 6x6 version. You keep both eyes open and see the
scene as normal, but with a white frame superimposed in your
brain

-

Comment by Algernon posted on How many K-01 owners here? at 17/08/2012 - 15:26

Algernon
Bit unfair of Mike-P to only quote part of the review,
especially when the site concerned has also done a
page on the viewfinder.

http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/AA77/AA77A3.HTM

Also the same review states that on continuous shooting the
A77 is showing the previous frame captured and not the one
currently being captured Hardly an example of no lag

This site shows the A77 to have more shutter lag than
the K-5.... this will help the viewfinder to look a
bit more efficient.

http://snapsort.com/compare/Pentax_K-5-vs-Sony-A77

-

Comment by Algernon posted on How many K-01 owners here? at 17/08/2012 - 14:38

Algernon
This video shows the lag of the Pentax Q viewfinder. It would
be interesting to see one for the K-01

http://whatblogisthis.blogspot.co.uk/2012/08/lag-of-pentax-q-rear-lcd.html


-

Comment by Algernon posted on How many K-01 owners here? at 17/08/2012 - 13:47

Algernon
BigJR wrote:
In some respects I actually find it preferable (composing on a screen). By having the camera at arms length you can get a greater appreciate what is going on outside of your frame, which can often be difficult when using a viewfinder.

Also, holding a camera up to your face often makes certain subjects act differently which can impact the type of shot you're trying to capture. In fact I find the further I can keep a camera from my face, the more likely I am to get the shot I want (in terms of candid shots specifically).

As with all things in life it's a case of horses for courses.
For live action nothing beats a direct optical viewfinder. Everything else will not be in real time and then there's the time lag from pressing the shutter to the image being captured. You might manage to capture something now and again at arms length as long as it's not moving too fast A lot of the time you will just capture a blank frame

-

Comment by Algernon posted on How many K-01 owners here? at 17/08/2012 - 12:43

Algernon
Anyone looking for a new phone, it seems that according
to a listing on ebay Pentax made one

"Ashi Pentax 80 - 200 mm telephone lens f4.5"

Comment by Algernon posted on Another pointless thread at 17/08/2012 - 09:41

Algernon
One of the good things on this side was that the BBC had 24 channels on satellite with an A-Z index of what was on each channel and the coverage was a 100% advert free with no interruptions. Had it been on commercial TV we would have had almost 50% adverts.

Well done the BBC

Comment by Algernon posted on London Olympics at 17/08/2012 - 07:14

Algernon
I don't really need one I've got a belt with a built in Bottle Opener

http://www.surfdome.com/billabong_belts_-_billabong_format_belt_-_black-94447

Comment by Algernon posted on Another pointless thread at 16/08/2012 - 21:39

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo