Algernon

Joined: 22nd May 2010

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

Algernon
Smeggypants wrote:
andrewk wrote:
As Algernon says - "Why carry a load of primes about when one zoom will do the job?"

Because sadly they don't make Zooms that open as wide as 1.4 or 1.2.

Simples
The Pentax 50-200mm would fit in well with your kind of shooting. I've never used one, but I'm impressed
with the Bokeh in this thread.

Waterporrof version available as well

Jay Maisel manages superbly with just one
Nikon 28-300mm lens link

-

Comment by Algernon posted on Prime Killer ;-) Pentax-F SMC 28-80mm f3.5-4.5 at 03/02/2013 - 10:39

Algernon
Looks like a rubbish lens and wrong colour balance to me

Comment by Algernon posted on Is this purple fringing? at 03/02/2013 - 08:29

Algernon
That's a classic Very Funnee!

So is this short one.....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mxlUaYoGm_Y

-

Comment by Algernon posted on wedding photographer fail at 03/02/2013 - 08:19

Algernon
You could have posted them here Andrew.... no problem

I still like the 'A' Series version of the 35-70mm f/4
and the infinity focus is spot on, so ate 35mm you can
set it to f8 and infinity and not have to bother re-focussing.
It's also slightly sharper, but not as good as the
F 28-80mm.

Comment by Algernon posted on Prime Killer ;-) Pentax-F SMC 28-80mm f3.5-4.5 at 02/02/2013 - 17:51

Algernon
It would but I still wouldn't need a prime

The HDR was very mild just boosted the shadows from 1 shot.
It's not 3 shot HDR..... the horse wouldn't stay still that long

I might have been able to just lift the shadows enough
with curves.

Comment by Algernon posted on Prime Killer ;-) Pentax-F SMC 28-80mm f3.5-4.5 at 02/02/2013 - 15:19

Algernon
Another couple from the Pentax 55-300mm Zoom

Horse

Comment Image


Heavy crop

Comment Image


-

Comment by Algernon posted on Prime Killer ;-) Pentax-F SMC 28-80mm f3.5-4.5 at 02/02/2013 - 14:26

Algernon
Straight from JPG's No PP... just slight crops.

Pentax-K 50mm f/1.2 @ f/1.2 Poor available light. ISO400
Handheld 1/30th sec.

Fender Guitar

Comment Image


Cherry Keyboard

Comment Image


-

Comment by Algernon posted on Lens Shootout: Pentax Prime Lenses 50-55mm at 02/02/2013 - 14:20

Algernon
obione wrote:
one was f2.8 1/125 iso 1600 and other f5.6 1/125 iso 6400
That's for the FA Lens only...... Look at the Exif data.

The other lens is 1/125th ISO800 for both shots

Maybe the blades are sticking?


-

Comment by Algernon posted on Lens Shootout: Pentax Prime Lenses 50-55mm at 02/02/2013 - 12:44

Algernon
JAK wrote:
Hardgravity wrote:
Why the need for a full frame?
Not sure that anyone really needs a camera at all, full frame or otherwise. But presuming one does what type one wants is a personal decision.

Back in the film days, should you be tasked with preparing a slide show, would you want normal 35mm transparencies or half frame (=APS-C more or less)?

With everything else being equal, the 'full frame' 35mm ones would have more definition, less grain, look sharper, less prone to dust. Doesn't that apply to digital as well?

John
No....

Comment by Algernon posted on Full Frame getting closer ? at 02/02/2013 - 11:00

Algernon
Pentax must have thought a lot of the 28-80mm f3.5-4.5 there
are about 6 versions of it inc. 'A' Series and Takumars.
The cheaper versions seem to have been made in the same
factory as the Takumars and have a red dot/wart near the
aperture ring.

The one to go for is the SMC (original) version which at the
time of release cost £200. Quite rare because of the original
cost, but they do crop up.

See also this thread.

The 24-90mm is also a very good lens.

-

Comment by Algernon posted on Pentax F 28-80/35-80? at 02/02/2013 - 09:31

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo