Algernon

Joined: 22nd May 2010

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

Algernon
tyronet2000 wrote:
....... tempted to take the plunge
Wait til the weather warms up a bit Stan.... BRRR!!!

Comment by Algernon posted on K01 Or Q? at 23/03/2013 - 13:34

Algernon
The Jessop or Teleplus 1.7x's have all the contacts and work
well with the Sigma 150-500mm, which is the only Sigma lens
I have. It also works brilliantly with the Pentax 55-300mm.

I also have the rare Tamron 1.4x which doesn't give very good images
with the Pentax 55-300mm but works with the DA*300mm f/4 and probably
the Sigma 150-500mm.

See this thread.

-

Comment by Algernon posted on Could I use a TC and get AF with the Sigma 70-200mm F2.8 EX DG OS HSM? at 22/03/2013 - 21:04

Algernon
Bugger! the ICE is melting in my rum and coke
I'll have to go and sit outside!

Comment by Algernon posted on Another pointless thread at 22/03/2013 - 20:58

Algernon
All flights have been cancelled to and from
Wigan George Formby Airport due to the
snow and the Paddle Steamer service has
also been called off due to ice stopping them
docking at Wigan Pier

-

Comment by Algernon posted on Another pointless thread at 22/03/2013 - 18:15

Algernon
I doubt if this will work properly with a tele-lens.

I've never met anyone who knows how to work it even with
a 50mm lens

-

Comment by Algernon posted on catch in focus. How do you do it? at 22/03/2013 - 11:38

Algernon
wadna wrote:
Algernon wrote:
I can't think of any downsides as long as the exposure is
correct. You would of course need good light and it would
work well with flash.

It does effect the highlight/shadow protection, but I think
you are restricted to ISO 200 with that anyway.

-
ISO 160 not 200 but that is splitting hairs at 1/3 stop.
I did mention ISO 160 about 6 posts back
It seems that the Highlight protection underexposes by 1 stop
which isn't a bad idea anyway, you can easily lift it in PP and
if you do burn out the highlights they can't be recovered.

After a bit more research it does seem that the Highlight/Shadow
protection is applied to the in camera JPG's and that the
Pentax computer software can apply it to the RAW files.

As long as you underexpose any bright highlights shadow detail
can be recovered from RAW's in PP without shadow or highlight
protection. It's hardly worth bothering too much about dynamic
range because a monitor only shows about 8.5 stops anyway. Any
extra noise in the shadows at 200ISO won't be very visible.

This is a good but boring 3 video demonstration...

-

Comment by Algernon posted on Low ISO at 22/03/2013 - 11:24

Algernon
The K-5 Manual doesn't explain this in detail. I'll have
to have a look around tomorrow to see why they restrict
the minimum speed to ISO 160-200 and if it applies to
JPG and RAW. If it's not needed in RAW why is it there?

-

Comment by Algernon posted on Low ISO at 21/03/2013 - 21:27

Algernon
davidstorm wrote:
If you're shooting in RAW it's best to leave the highlight and shadow settings switched off. There is no point in them for RAW shooters.

Regards
David
Are you sure about that? They definitely wouldn't be any
use for JPG's

The Nuthatch in my portfolio was rescued from a black DNG
file. I've still got the JPG as well I might see how much
I can rescue from that.

-

Comment by Algernon posted on Low ISO at 21/03/2013 - 19:47

Algernon
I can't think of any downsides as long as the exposure is
correct. You would of course need good light and it would
work well with flash.

It does effect the highlight/shadow protection, but I think
you are restricted to ISO 200 with that anyway.

-

Comment by Algernon posted on Low ISO at 21/03/2013 - 18:47

Algernon
judderman62 wrote:
whereabouts on that page are we clicking ? can't seem to see where you are looking
Select the "Measurements" TAB

It's a TAB that says "Measurements"

Not the TAB that says "Specs"

-

Comment by Algernon posted on Low ISO at 21/03/2013 - 17:19

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo