All Forum Comments
Comment by Algernon posted on Road map and 1.4x converter at 28/10/2013 - 09:20
let the camera know that a TC is attached and adjust the focal
length to the correct one for the SR...... but no one's asked
for that or even looked at the existing contacts to see if
anything can be done to make the camera let you set the
FL manually.
It's pointless asking for a TC without a camera that
can use it properly.
--
Comment by Algernon posted on Road map and 1.4x converter at 28/10/2013 - 08:23
There are loads of 1.4x to 1.7x TC's available SH
Why would you want another apart from having a moan!
--
What current Pentax AF 1.4x converter can I use matched to my DA* 300mm with minimal loss of IQ and AF speed then please, as per Canon, Nikon?
Dave
through. Pentax can't improve on that with a new one.
Optically the Tamrons/Teleplus TC's are quite good. Unlikely that
Pentax can do much better than that with a new one.
It is after all just a magnifier
They may be able to tweak the AF in the camera to work better
with a TC including tweaking the SDM...... but you haven't
asked for that. Something to moan about later if they ever
release a TC.
The Pentax 1.7x adapter works well with the DA*300mm and there's
was one for sale here last week for a very low price.
I prefer to use the 55-300mm or Sigma 150-500mm with the
Jessop 1.7x TC.
--
Comment by Algernon posted on Road map and 1.4x converter at 27/10/2013 - 20:21
He's wearing Ear Defenders
--
Comment by Algernon posted on Another pointless thread at 27/10/2013 - 15:44
a rumour it's actually shown 16secs into this official video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vs8mhoVML5g
Made for street photography in all conditions.... built in
snow plough and a portable 1:1 scale model Red GPO Phone
Box to plonk anywhere you want in the street so that you
won't be spotted
The purchase of Pentax is shown at 4min 30sec.
I'm impressed with the man who can light up bulbs
with his fingers at 4min 38sec.
--
Comment by Algernon posted on Full Frame (again) at 27/10/2013 - 14:11
Well - it has to be admitted that that time of the year is approaching
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g8uiptLygv4
--
Comment by Algernon posted on Another pointless thread at 27/10/2013 - 12:56
taken from the same spot. So a very rigid tripod with a fast
QR must have been used.
They are both 24MB cameras so I wouldn't expect much difference
in sharpness. You can't really compare 3D images from 2 cameras
they will never be focussed on the same point and +/- 7mm can
make a big difference.
The bokeh which really depends on the lens used even though
the D600 will have more OOF pixels looks better to me with
the Pentax 55mm which is a surprise considering the other lens
is an 85mm which usually has nice bokeh.
If you were to make screen sized files I wouldn't think there
would be much difference between K-5.... K-3 and D600
--
Comment by Algernon posted on The new standard of performance - K3 shoot. at 27/10/2013 - 10:25
Why would you want another apart from having a moan!
--
Comment by Algernon posted on Road map and 1.4x converter at 27/10/2013 - 09:08
I'm sure that the silicone baking trays sold in the likes of
Poundland would work if cut up. Some are even ribbed.
Smaller bits of rubber can be obtained from old turntable belts.
Rubber roofing felt is ideal, but hard to come by.
--
Comment by Algernon posted on Tripod plate that won't rotate camera in portrait orientation at 22/10/2013 - 16:11
a rowing boat!
--
Comment by Algernon posted on FS: Genuine Pentax M42 - K Adapters (Boxed) : 2 No. at 22/10/2013 - 13:58


almost certainly need at least one extra contact on the TC
and camera to indicate that a TC was there. But even that
wouldn't be enough it would also need to pass the factor
1.4x or 2.0x etc.
It's required not only for the SR, but also for the
aperture.
--