Yet another K100d/K10d flash compatibility thread!
Posted 23/06/2007 - 09:30
Link
Quote:
It now seems there is a samsung SEF 36PZF as well as the SEF 54PZF. these guns are £149-99 &£181-99 at Amazon etc. As I said before they are rebadged Pentax guns.Well what do you all think?
If they really are identical to the AF360 and AF540 (and therefore fully compatible with the K10D, and provide all the cool features that the Pentax guns do), then I'll get the 54.It now seems there is a samsung SEF 36PZF as well as the SEF 54PZF. these guns are £149-99 &£181-99 at Amazon etc. As I said before they are rebadged Pentax guns.Well what do you all think?
I won't be paying an extra £150 for a Pentax badge just for a flashgun. But the £30 more than the Sigma gun (EF-500 DG Super) probably is worth paying for what I'd guess to be slightly better build quality and compatibility.
Posted 24/06/2007 - 20:30
Link
Having looked at the Samsung (both models) there is no mention of features such as trailing curtain sync or high speed sync.
Posted 24/06/2007 - 22:14
Link
Quote:
Having looked at the Samsung (both models) there is no mention of features such as trailing curtain sync or high speed sync.
But they do have those features.Having looked at the Samsung (both models) there is no mention of features such as trailing curtain sync or high speed sync.
I have the Samsung SEF-36PZF
Besides the branding I can see absolutely no difference between the Pentax and Samsung units.
Here's a shot of the backside of the Samsung flash. (yes I know it is a crappy shot and the bottom part isn't in focus )

Camera:K20D|Ist*DS|Spotmatic II|MZ-10
Pentax Lenses: DA16-45|DA50-200|50A 1.7
Tamron Lenses: 28-200
Takumar Lenses: SMC 55 1.8
Sigma Lenses: EX DG 50-500 'Bigma'|EX 50mm Macro
Flashes: Metz 58 AF-1|Samsung SEF-36PZF|Pentax AF-220T
Pentax Lenses: DA16-45|DA50-200|50A 1.7
Tamron Lenses: 28-200
Takumar Lenses: SMC 55 1.8
Sigma Lenses: EX DG 50-500 'Bigma'|EX 50mm Macro
Flashes: Metz 58 AF-1|Samsung SEF-36PZF|Pentax AF-220T
Posted 24/06/2007 - 23:08
Link
They're identical? In that case, and if the Samsung on that Amazon link is the same as the AF-540, then is Pentax asking £150 more for nothing more than the name "Pentax"? That does not seem smart to me, though it does remind me of my criticisms over their pricing of Tokina/Pentax lenses. One of my favourite things about Pentax was the value for money I felt you got with their equipment. This is certainly still the case with camera bodies, but it seems less so many lenses and flashes
If it is the case that the flashes are operationally identical then I really think Pentax needs to rethink their prices.
If it is the case that the flashes are operationally identical then I really think Pentax needs to rethink their prices.
Posted 24/06/2007 - 23:32
Link
you know, there are ways to cut costs (usually cheaper components) and maintain the same specs on paper....
Ever compare an old volkswagon rabbit to a dodge omni/plymouth horizon?
incredible difference in build quality from the same design/tooling.
I remember having to replace my oilpan on my omni with a pan from a rabbit, after hitting a porcupine...the quills went throough the pan. The omni,'s pan had 8 bolts and felt like a tinfoil roasting pan, the rabbits pan felt like a stainless steel cooking pot, and had sixteen bolts (eight of which lined up perfectly with the omni's engine block (which co-incedentlty had "made in germany" stamped in it.).
Ever compare an old volkswagon rabbit to a dodge omni/plymouth horizon?
incredible difference in build quality from the same design/tooling.
I remember having to replace my oilpan on my omni with a pan from a rabbit, after hitting a porcupine...the quills went throough the pan. The omni,'s pan had 8 bolts and felt like a tinfoil roasting pan, the rabbits pan felt like a stainless steel cooking pot, and had sixteen bolts (eight of which lined up perfectly with the omni's engine block (which co-incedentlty had "made in germany" stamped in it.).
Fired many shots. Didn't kill anything.
Posted 24/06/2007 - 23:41
Link
rabbits, porcupines, roasting pans, hehehe
sound like a redneck dinner party!!!
sound like a redneck dinner party!!!
Fired many shots. Didn't kill anything.
Posted 24/06/2007 - 23:51
Link
Quote:
you know, there are ways to cut costs (usually cheaper components) and maintain the same specs on paper....
Don I'd like to believe you're right, but I can't just take it for granted that the Pentax is better built; just like I can't automatically take it for granted that Pentax lenses offer enough of an improvement over their optically equivalent Tokinas for the price difference. I'd need to know that it was the case before I accept having to pay a not insubstantial amount of money.you know, there are ways to cut costs (usually cheaper components) and maintain the same specs on paper....
Oh and roast roadkill porcupine sounds tasty
Posted 24/06/2007 - 23:57
Link
there's two ways to find out.
A) buy one of each and gut'em.
B) watch samsungs forums, and compare the amount/type of complaints, thier equipment gets over a 5 year span, and calculate the percentages of problems, and durability of thier products, compare to pentaxes.
A) buy one of each and gut'em.
B) watch samsungs forums, and compare the amount/type of complaints, thier equipment gets over a 5 year span, and calculate the percentages of problems, and durability of thier products, compare to pentaxes.
Fired many shots. Didn't kill anything.
Posted 25/06/2007 - 00:16
Link
I see your point that there's no way to know. Would I be wrong in assuming that you think the Pentax is the safer choice, a guarantee of quality? Personally I am naturally suspicious, and I wonder if the flashes are identical bar the name and that Pentax knows that there are many Pentax users who assume the name guarantees a higher quality, therefore they feel they can get away with charging so much extra
Do you know where your towel is?
Posted 25/06/2007 - 08:10
Link
People who bought Pentax, Nikon, Canon, Leica, etc. 35mm SLR film cameras are still in the game. Where are those who bought Rollei, Mamiya, Prinzflex, Miranda, Chinon....the list is long.
Also, don't forget that Samsung cameras are Pentax this year, but next year they may be sourced elesewhere. Samsung don't make them, so when the contract is up for renewal anything could happen.
Also, don't forget that Samsung cameras are Pentax this year, but next year they may be sourced elesewhere. Samsung don't make them, so when the contract is up for renewal anything could happen.
Best regards, John
Posted 25/06/2007 - 09:39
Link
Quote:
I see your point that there's no way to know. Would I be wrong in assuming that you think the Pentax is the safer choice, a guarantee of quality? Personally I am naturally suspicious, and I wonder if the flashes are identical bar the name and that Pentax knows that there are many Pentax users who assume the name guarantees a higher quality, therefore they feel they can get away with charging so much extra
The Pentax is certainly the safer choice, the only question is just how much safer and does it justify the extra cost.I see your point that there's no way to know. Would I be wrong in assuming that you think the Pentax is the safer choice, a guarantee of quality? Personally I am naturally suspicious, and I wonder if the flashes are identical bar the name and that Pentax knows that there are many Pentax users who assume the name guarantees a higher quality, therefore they feel they can get away with charging so much extra
In a camera I'd say yes, in a lens, maybe depending on the difference. In a flash which is nearly double the price for the Pentax badge I'm afraid I'll be buying the Sammy if I ever scrape the money together.
you don't have to be mad to post here
but it does help
but it does help
Posted 25/06/2007 - 10:07
Link
Quote:
In a camera I'd say yes, in a lens, maybe depending on the difference. In a flash which is nearly double the price for the Pentax badge I'm afraid I'll be buying the Sammy if I ever scrape the money together.
Moi aussi.ZaphodB wrote:
I see your point that there's no way to know. Would I be wrong in assuming that you think the Pentax is the safer choice, a guarantee of quality? Personally I am naturally suspicious, and I wonder if the flashes are identical bar the name and that Pentax knows that there are many Pentax users who assume the name guarantees a higher quality, therefore they feel they can get away with charging so much extra
The Pentax is certainly the safer choice, the only question is just how much safer and does it justify the extra cost.I see your point that there's no way to know. Would I be wrong in assuming that you think the Pentax is the safer choice, a guarantee of quality? Personally I am naturally suspicious, and I wonder if the flashes are identical bar the name and that Pentax knows that there are many Pentax users who assume the name guarantees a higher quality, therefore they feel they can get away with charging so much extra
In a camera I'd say yes, in a lens, maybe depending on the difference. In a flash which is nearly double the price for the Pentax badge I'm afraid I'll be buying the Sammy if I ever scrape the money together.
G
Keywords: Charming, polite, and generally agreeable.
Posted 25/06/2007 - 10:36
Link
Quote:
I wonder if the flashes are identical bar the name
The SEF-54PZF and the AF-540 FGZ are both 380g in weight, excluding batteries.I wonder if the flashes are identical bar the name
A bit of a coincidence if they're different inside.
On another note, a bit of a noob question if you'll forgive me... what extra bits would I need with either of these to mount the gun on a hammerhead? It weighs nearly a pound, so it would be nice to be able to have it off the camera.
Posted 25/06/2007 - 10:48
Link
Quote:
On another note, a bit of a noob question if you'll forgive me... what extra bits would I need with either of these to mount the gun on a hammerhead?
Some very expensive bits of Pentax 5P connectors and cable On another note, a bit of a noob question if you'll forgive me... what extra bits would I need with either of these to mount the gun on a hammerhead?
For the AF-540 (or equiv) there's a connector on the left hand side (not very handy on that side TBH), which means you'll need the hotshoe adapter Fg and a curly cable.
Will cost anywhere up to £30 each second hand for those two bits.
For the AF-360 you'll need the "Off camera adapter F" that connects the cable and provides a hotshoe. Again, up to about £30.
That's if you can still find 'em!
Matt
http://www.mattmatic.co.uk
(For gallery, tips and links)
(For gallery, tips and links)
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


2041 posts
19 years
Kettering Northants