Wide Angle?
Posted 25/01/2011 - 16:44
Link
Yes, used Sigma 10-20s (the old f4-5.6 one) go for around £300 or sometimes a bit less.
Your other options include the Pentax 12-24, Sigma 12-24, Tamron 10-24, Sigma 8-16, Pentax 14, Pentax 15 and probably some others. I haven't mentioned any fisheyes. All of these will be more expensive than the old Sigma 10-20.
Your other options include the Pentax 12-24, Sigma 12-24, Tamron 10-24, Sigma 8-16, Pentax 14, Pentax 15 and probably some others. I haven't mentioned any fisheyes. All of these will be more expensive than the old Sigma 10-20.
Tim
AF - Pentax K5, Sigma 10-20/4-5.6, Tamron 17-50/2.8, Sigma 30/1.4, Sigma 70-200/2.8, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6
MF - Vivitar CF 28/2.8, Tamron AD2 90/2.5, MTO 1000/11
Stuff - Metz 58 AF1, Cactus v4, Nikon SB24, Raynox 150, Sigma 1.4x TC, Sigma 2x TC, Kenko 2x macro TC, Redsnapper 283 tripod, iMac 27”, Macbook Pro 17”, iPad, iPhone 3G
Flickr • Fluidr • PPG • Street • Portfolio site
Feel free to edit any of my posted photos! If I post a photo for critique, I want brutal honesty. If you don't like it, please say so and tell me why!
AF - Pentax K5, Sigma 10-20/4-5.6, Tamron 17-50/2.8, Sigma 30/1.4, Sigma 70-200/2.8, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6
MF - Vivitar CF 28/2.8, Tamron AD2 90/2.5, MTO 1000/11
Stuff - Metz 58 AF1, Cactus v4, Nikon SB24, Raynox 150, Sigma 1.4x TC, Sigma 2x TC, Kenko 2x macro TC, Redsnapper 283 tripod, iMac 27”, Macbook Pro 17”, iPad, iPhone 3G
Flickr • Fluidr • PPG • Street • Portfolio site
Feel free to edit any of my posted photos! If I post a photo for critique, I want brutal honesty. If you don't like it, please say so and tell me why!
Posted 25/01/2011 - 17:13
Link
This is a thread which will throw up a range of differing opinions so you'll be lucky to reach any conclusion from it, however...
I replaced my Sigma 10-20 with a used Pentax DA 12-24 & personally find the Pentax produces much better results/more pleasing images - unfortunately a used DA will probably cost more than a new Sigma, I think it's worth it though!!
I did consider primes (14, 15mm) but read a couple of reviews which stated the DA12-24 outperformed them, which I can believe, the zoom range is very useful too - I think you get the message I'm trying to get across
Simon
I replaced my Sigma 10-20 with a used Pentax DA 12-24 & personally find the Pentax produces much better results/more pleasing images - unfortunately a used DA will probably cost more than a new Sigma, I think it's worth it though!!
I did consider primes (14, 15mm) but read a couple of reviews which stated the DA12-24 outperformed them, which I can believe, the zoom range is very useful too - I think you get the message I'm trying to get across
Simon
My website http://www.landscapephotographyuk.com
My Facebook page http://www.facebook.com/landscapephotographyuk
Find me on Google+ link
My Facebook page http://www.facebook.com/landscapephotographyuk
Find me on Google+ link
Posted 25/01/2011 - 17:18
Link
I would totally recommend the SMC Pentax-DA 12-24mm f4 lens, which produces superb results.
Best regards, John
Posted 25/01/2011 - 17:19
Link
I'm not sure if any of the cut-price Samsung-badged 12-24mm lenses are still knocking around.
They were available for £199 at one point. Bargain of the century.
They were available for £199 at one point. Bargain of the century.
If you can't say something nice about Pentax, you won't say anything at all.
Apparently.
Apparently.
Posted 25/01/2011 - 17:29
Link
I sold my 12-24mm as I rarely used it and for that sort of money it deserved to go out more. I replaced it with a Sigma 12-24mm which cost half what I got for the Pentax lens and have to say the IQ is a lot closer than the difference in value would have you believe.
The Sigma will also work on a full frame camera should Pentax ever bring one out.
The Sigma will also work on a full frame camera should Pentax ever bring one out.
Posted 25/01/2011 - 17:49
Link
I'm interested in this thread as I too would like a wider lens to add to my DA 21, which I use a lot. My preference is for small lenses so I'm most tempted by the DA15. The combined weight of the DA 15 and DA 21 is significantly less than the DA 12-24, and they focus closer (and I already have a 49mm CPL filter, the cost of a 77mm is worth thinking about). However would 15mm really give me that much more than the 16-45 I already have? And, as Simon says, the reviews of the DA 15 are critical of sharpness wide open...
...all of which means that I'm also undecided and interested in what people have to say on the subject
...all of which means that I'm also undecided and interested in what people have to say on the subject
Regards, Philip
Posted 25/01/2011 - 18:52
Link
I have the DA 15; it's easily half the size and weight of the UWA zooms. If you're going out on a mission to get ultrawide photographs, I imagine that the 12-24 or 10-20 will offer very useful flexibility. But if you want a tiny, high-quality ultrawide that can always be in your bag for when the opportunity presents itself, I'd recommend the DA15.
It's also incredibly flare-resistant, and makes quite cool fourteen-pointed starbursts if you stop it down and shoot into the sun. (Or other point light sources.)
It's also incredibly flare-resistant, and makes quite cool fourteen-pointed starbursts if you stop it down and shoot into the sun. (Or other point light sources.)
K-x with a bunch of primes (both auto and manual)
Posted 25/01/2011 - 19:04
Link
I certainly must vote for the humble 10-20.
I believe 2mm at the wide end would be quite significant in comparison to the DA 12-24; though I do appreciate the 12-24 is oneheluva lens. Value for money though is what let's the 12-24 down.
I've been VERY happy with my 10-20, and for the price you cannnot fault it.
I believe 2mm at the wide end would be quite significant in comparison to the DA 12-24; though I do appreciate the 12-24 is oneheluva lens. Value for money though is what let's the 12-24 down.
I've been VERY happy with my 10-20, and for the price you cannnot fault it.
Posted 25/01/2011 - 20:12
Link
The Tamron 10-24 is a nice lens
Nobody is perfect, but being Scottish is a start
Posted 25/01/2011 - 22:35
Link
Don't overlook the Pentax DA 14mm f2.8
I have one and love it
..
I have one and love it
..
[i]Bodies: 1x K-5IIs, 2x K-5, Sony TX-5, Nokia 808
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283
Posted 25/01/2011 - 23:58
Link
Thanks for the replies everyone I think for now mainly for cost but also because I loved my old one I'm going to looks for a used Sigma 10-20 just now but long term I would love a Pentax 12-24 or some of the wider primes!
Posted 26/01/2011 - 09:59
Link
I've noticed a 10-20 on sale used via a dealer for £329 which seems a good deal, but a brand new one is £399 via SRS with a full 3 year Warranty, etc is it worth paying the extra £69 for the warranty? I guess it would have more resale value later on if I was to sell than one without.
Posted 26/01/2011 - 10:53
Link
I'm sure the Pentax 12-24mm wide angle lens is superb. But for less cash I bought a Sigma 10-20mm lens and it too is excellent. I know quite a few photographers who own the wide angle Siggie, Canon and Nikon users as well as Pentax, and they all rave about the Sigma 10-20.
David
David
Posted 26/01/2011 - 11:01
Link
chrism_scotland wrote:
I've noticed a 10-20 on sale used via a dealer for £329 which seems a good deal, but a brand new one is £399 via SRS with a full 3 year Warranty, etc is it worth paying the extra £69 for the warranty? I guess it would have more resale value later on if I was to sell than one without.
You wouldn't get any more for the SRS one if you sold it on. Personally I'd go with the 2nd hand one.
I've noticed a 10-20 on sale used via a dealer for £329 which seems a good deal, but a brand new one is £399 via SRS with a full 3 year Warranty, etc is it worth paying the extra £69 for the warranty? I guess it would have more resale value later on if I was to sell than one without.
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


353 posts
16 years
Edinburgh
Also if I paid £290 for a used Sigma 10-20 (Sony) around 18 months ago should I be looking to pay similar for a Pentax fit lens now?