Which Wide angle ?
Posted 06/09/2010 - 08:33 - Helpful Comment
Link
Hi - we go round this quite often as its a popular topic. The Signa 10-20mm is the cheapest option (keep your eye open for 2nd hand deals).
Alternatively, a no-cost option would be to stich multiple shots together - free software such as Hugin or ICE allow you do this semi-automagically, although results can be somewhat bizarre sometimes, depending on how good your panning was...
Alternatively, a no-cost option would be to stich multiple shots together - free software such as Hugin or ICE allow you do this semi-automagically, although results can be somewhat bizarre sometimes, depending on how good your panning was...
Still shooting in the dark (literally and metaphorically)...
Posted 06/09/2010 - 11:27 - Helpful Comment
Link
your kit lens gives you a wide angle at 18mm this is wider than your 27mm compact.whether it is wide enough only you can decide. try comparison shots of the same scene. another is the tamron 10-24mm around similar price to the sigma . dont know about IQ between the two though but some body here will.
Posted 06/09/2010 - 12:33 - Helpful Comment
Link
justa wrote:
I know there is a conversion somewhere and i know my 18-55 isn't wider than my 27 compact !
There is no conversion at all I know there is a conversion somewhere and i know my 18-55 isn't wider than my 27 compact !
A 18mm lens is 18mm no matter what camera you put it on since it's physical feature of the lens.
The angle of view does change when you move the lens on different formats.
If you're use to the 135format than an APS-C format would feel 1.5x longer.
The lens is still 18mm though but it behaves like a 27mm lens on 135 format and if you put the 27mm on the APS-C the smaller image will make it feel like a 40mm lens.
I hope it's all understandable what I wrote.
Posted 06/09/2010 - 13:01
Link
I think that makes sense - I remember reading somewhere that my 18mm lens is about 27mm in compact terms - not sure whether this is true ?
Posted 06/09/2010 - 13:19
Link
justa wrote:
I think that makes sense - I remember reading somewhere that my 18mm lens is about 27mm in compact terms - not sure whether this is true ?
The size quoted on compats is most of the time the 135format (fullframe, film) equivalent.I think that makes sense - I remember reading somewhere that my 18mm lens is about 27mm in compact terms - not sure whether this is true ?
If so than 18mm on your DSLR will give the same angle of view as the quoted 27mm on your compact.
it depends on the sensor size of your compact but most likely the real focal length is something like 8mm.
Posted 06/09/2010 - 13:21 - Helpful Comment
Link
justa wrote:
I think that makes sense - I remember reading somewhere that my 18mm lens is about 27mm in compact terms - not sure whether this is true ?
Actually, there is no way that a compact would start at 27mm for a wide angle! However, manufacturers often mark their lenses for compacts with focal lengths that are the equivalent of what they would be for 35mm film (or "full frame"). The 18mm of the Pentax kit lens should given an almost identical field of view to what your Panasonic calls "27mm".I think that makes sense - I remember reading somewhere that my 18mm lens is about 27mm in compact terms - not sure whether this is true ?
If you want to go wider than either of these, you have the options listed by others here:
(1) take several shots and stitch them together in software. By the way, if by any chance you have Photoshop Elements, it already has the ability to do this (Photomerge) built in.
(2) Choose between the Pentax 12-24 (v good but expensive) or the Tamron 10-24 or the Sigma 10-20. I have compared the latter two and feel that although the Tamron is nice and sharp in the centre, the Sigma is much better towards the edges. The Sigma also feels better made. A secondhand Sigma in mint condition with all its original bits is likely to run to around £300. The Tamron is a more recent lens and you don't see them secondhand terribly often.
One other possibility is to buy a wide angle converter to screw into the filter thread of your kit lens. I think "Digital King" is a brand you see quite often, but cannot comment on how good the results would be. My expectation of putting more glass on the front of the kit lens would not be terribly high, however, and I suspect you would have lots of issues with edge sharpness, distortions, and lens aberrations giving coloured fringing. Perhaps others who have tried these converters can comment more?
Finally, Samyang have recently announced a 14mm prime lens. Their lenses are usually surprisingly good and decently-made as well as being exceptional value for money. I have not seen any reviews, but the website that may have one is called "LensTip". I'd expect the new Samyang to be around the same price, or cheaper, than the secondhand Sigma.
Hope this helps,
Jon
Posted 06/09/2010 - 15:30
Link
Well I'd vote for the Pentax 10-17 fish eye.
It's simply great fun. yes the 17mm end is still distorted but if you're a purist you can always do some correction in LR or Ptlens.
However fun prevails AFAIC, that's what I'm snapping for
It's simply great fun. yes the 17mm end is still distorted but if you're a purist you can always do some correction in LR or Ptlens.
However fun prevails AFAIC, that's what I'm snapping for
[i]Bodies: 1x K-5IIs, 2x K-5, Sony TX-5, Nokia 808
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283
Posted 06/09/2010 - 17:12 - Helpful Comment
Link
One thing to bear in mind with stitching software (which I use pretty extensively):
You need to use a lens with limited distortion for best results. I use an SMC Pentax 28mm f3.5 prime for landscapes now, and pan across the scene taking multiple shots with the same settings.
You need to use a lens with limited distortion for best results. I use an SMC Pentax 28mm f3.5 prime for landscapes now, and pan across the scene taking multiple shots with the same settings.
Matt
Shooting the Welsh Wilderness with K-m, KX, MX, ME Super and assorted lenses.
Shooting the Welsh Wilderness with K-m, KX, MX, ME Super and assorted lenses.
Posted 06/09/2010 - 17:21
Link
thanks folks some good stuff there - I use PTGui Pro for stitching panoramas - with mixed results !
Some good some rubbish - mind you have the problem I have is remembering which photos I have taken as panorama's !
Sorry Dangermouse what is an 28mm prime lens ? Do you mean fixed ? ANd I guess that is narrower than my 18-55 ?
Some good some rubbish - mind you have the problem I have is remembering which photos I have taken as panorama's !
Sorry Dangermouse what is an 28mm prime lens ? Do you mean fixed ? ANd I guess that is narrower than my 18-55 ?
Posted 06/09/2010 - 17:43 - Helpful Comment
Link
Yes prime means fixed ( not zoomable )
[i]Bodies: 1x K-5IIs, 2x K-5, Sony TX-5, Nokia 808
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283
Posted 07/09/2010 - 23:09
Link
28mm is slightly wider than the mid point of your 18-55mm, the equivalent focal length on film would have been around 42mm. Co-incidentally that's only a mm off the fabled 43mm Ltd, which was created as Pentax decided that 43mm was a better "standard" focal length than the usual 50mm lenses.
The SMC Pentax-M 28mm f3.5 is not too hard to come by, is very sharp, and makes your camera a very compact package at the expense of being manual focus and needing you to use stop-down metering. £50 should get a good one if you watch and wait.
The SMC Pentax 28mm f3.5 (earlier, bigger, and heavier) is even better. Unfortunately it is not a common find, so you'll need to keep your eyes open.
Manual focus and aperture really aren't a problem in a landscape lens. Both of these lenses hit infinity focus very quickly (anything further away than about 3.5m) and can be left on f8. Just compose, press the button to stop down and meter, then shoot. I've had shots like this direct from the camera as JPGs with no post-processing.
The SMC Pentax-M 28mm f3.5 is not too hard to come by, is very sharp, and makes your camera a very compact package at the expense of being manual focus and needing you to use stop-down metering. £50 should get a good one if you watch and wait.
The SMC Pentax 28mm f3.5 (earlier, bigger, and heavier) is even better. Unfortunately it is not a common find, so you'll need to keep your eyes open.
Manual focus and aperture really aren't a problem in a landscape lens. Both of these lenses hit infinity focus very quickly (anything further away than about 3.5m) and can be left on f8. Just compose, press the button to stop down and meter, then shoot. I've had shots like this direct from the camera as JPGs with no post-processing.
Matt
Shooting the Welsh Wilderness with K-m, KX, MX, ME Super and assorted lenses.
Shooting the Welsh Wilderness with K-m, KX, MX, ME Super and assorted lenses.
Posted 07/09/2010 - 23:13
Link
Quote:
Pentax decided that 43mm was a better "standard" focal length than the usual 50mm lenses
Generally, it was traditionally accepted that the "standard" lens for a format was the diagonal measurement of the frame. That is actually 43mm for the 35mm film format. Most standards for 35mm cameras have been long standard lenses, more recently 50mm but before then 55mm or even 58mm. This had more to do with the limitations of lens design than anything else.
Pentax decided that 43mm was a better "standard" focal length than the usual 50mm lenses
Best regards, John
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



63 posts
15 years
Derby
Newbie question here - one of the reasons for me buying an SLR was to get a nice wide angle lens to go with it - i like landscape photos and buildings..
As I am new to this I don't really know what I am looking for - my kit lens is 18-55 but my Panasonic Compact was 27mm - I know there is a conversion somewhere and i know my 18-55 isn't wider than my 27 compact !
My budget is very limited so what should I look out for ? Second hand seems the best way forward but what make/size lens should I be looking for and what should I expect to pay ?
many thanks !